This should greatly assist those seeking veracity and confirmation we’ve been lied to on a massive scale for the past 500 years as to the heliocentric round ball earth theory vs. geocentric flat stationary earth theory.
****
200 Proofs Earth is NOT a Spinning Ball
200 Proofs Earth is Not a Spinning Ball! PDF
This 35 page ebook full of photographs and diagrams is the perfect tool to help spark conversation and awaken your friends and family to the mother of all conspiracies. Please make copies, print, distribute, re-upload and do everything you can to get this most important information out to the masses!
1) The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely flat horizon over 20+ miles high. Only NASA and other government “space agencies” show curvature in their fake CGI photos/videos.
2) The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you ascended the horizon would stay fixed and the observer / camera would have to tilt looking down further and further to see it.
3) The natural physics of water is to find and maintain its level. If Earth were a giant sphere tilted, wobbling and hurdling through infinite space then truly flat, consistently level surfaces would not exist here. But since Earth is in fact an extended flat plane, this fundamental physical property of fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with experience and common sense.
4) Rivers run down to sea-level finding the easiest course, North, South, East, West and all other intermediary directions over the Earth at the same time. If Earth were truly a spinning ball then many of these rivers would be impossibly flowing uphill, for example the Mississippi in its 3000 miles would have to ascend 11 miles before reaching the Gulf of Mexico.
5) One portion of the Nile River flows for a thousand miles with a fall of only one foot. Parts of the West African Congo, according to the supposed inclination and movement of the ball-Earth, would be sometimes running uphill and sometimes down. This would also be the case for the Parana, Paraguay and other long rivers.
6) If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference as NASA and modern astronomy claim, spherical trigonometry dictates the surface of all standing water must curve downward an easily measurable 8 inches per mile multiplied by the square of the distance. This means along a 6 mile channel of standing water, the Earth would dip 6 feet on either end from the central peak. Every time such experiments have been conducted, however, standing water has proven to be perfectly level.
Please support Mr. Dubay and buy his book, and one for an open minded friend.
Aplanetruth.info 
I only see six ‘proofs’ and they are all rediculous and unresearched. Four of them suppose that gravity pulls ‘downward’ along a vertical plane rather than to the centre of the Earth. Where are the other 94 proofs and are they equally juvenile?
LikeLike
not true and wrong about gravity pulling down. Gravity means “weight” in Latin. The Law of Gravity does not even include the word “Weight” in its definition. Ha! They got you and 99% (down from 100%) fooled with obfuscating language my friend. Please read this for further edification. Newton, et. all were all members of Secret Societies….why do you think this was so?
LikeLike
Gravity is till only an idea! Scientists don’t know what gravity is just as they can only speculate about dark matter, dark energy or the dark flow! Our reality is created by the observer, our perception of what we are taught from birth! One more thing! NASA is full of shit!
LikeLike
Do people really think like this? He believes in a flat earth model and applies flat earth theory to a ball earth model and when it does not work he thinks that is proof of a flat earth.
There is no absolute up or down on a ball earth model, so you conculsions about rivers going uphill because of the curvature of the earth is incorrect. You are applying a flat earth conclusion to a ball earth model. Any specific elevation above the earth around the ball is constant. Rivers flow down from higher elevations to lower elevations around the earth. There is no top and bottom of the earth.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seriously!?!, how does the Nile, over 1400 miles with an elevation drop of less than 5 feet the entire length, go uphill on a round sphere earth. same with the Amazon, Yangtze, and Mississippi, etc. Over such distance they all would have to go uphill and the oceans rise and fall hundreds of feet on a round ball.
LikeLike
“Uphill on a round sphere earth”?
The only “up” or “down” is in relation to the center of the Earth.
Point towards it and you’re pointing down.
Point away from it and you are pointing up.
Rivers don’t flow uphill — they flow to a point closer to the center of the earth.
The mouths of all rivers on Earth are lower in elevation than all points upriver — if not, they would all be very long and very narrow lakes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gravity is easy to explain the galaxie goes move out ward on great speeds then the galaxies spin in that galaxies we have a solar system that spins around the sun then the earth spins around the sun while going in in a circular movement everything is moving all this circular motions combined with speeds moving outward leads to pulling inwards if the earth was flat try this grab a flat piece of plywood and hold it while a car is moving what would happen? Most likely u would go flying the opposite direction now grad a ball and hold it out the car it would cause a tug but with arrow Dynamics’s a lot of wind would go around the ball. The earth is round not flat we do not fall of no edge of earth
LikeLike
For alternative theory of gravity, which in Etymology means “weight” which is not even mentioned in Newtonian Law of Gravity (hmmm), please see this excellent research.
and…
” I would say, however, that what is currently deemed “science” like Einsteins theory of relativity and Newton’s supposed “law of gravity,” are what’s truly dubious. Heliocentrists cannot show us a single object massive enough that by virtue of its mass alone, causes other smaller masses to stick to or orbit it as they claim happens with the Sun, Moon, Earth, Stars and Planets. If you cannot give me a single practical example of “gravity” smaller than the Earth or the Sun, then it is merely heresay, not science! Other than magnets, there are no objects they can point to to prove their supposed “gravity” that’s strong enough to hold people, buildings and the oceans stuck to the underside of a spinning ball-Earth, but weak enough to allow little bugs, birds, and helium balloons to fly away with ease. If there was a magical magnetism that held our feet firm to the underside of a spinning ball, we would feel this magical force every time we lifted our leg, and the force would increase like a magnet the closer our foot was to the ground. ” Eric Dubay
LikeLike
weight can be calculated from the masses involved, distance between their centers and the gravitational constant. So yes, the law of gravity is relevant to weight.
So you want an object that is way smaller than the earth that exhibits the same gravitational pull on objects that the earth does? The earth has the gravitational pull it has because of its mass. So to show you an example of comparable gravity then I would need to show you an object of comparable mass to the planet we live on. According to a quick google search the earth is about 5.972 × 10^24 kg. if I tried to show you an object 0.1% the mass of the earth it would have to have a mass of hundreds of trillions of kilograms…. needless to say that’s a pretty unreasonable request.
As for feeling the force of gravity increase like a magnet the closer our feet are to the ground? This logic applies only to the CENTER of two masses. So if you double the distance between yourself and the center of the earth then you should feel half the force, and therefore weigh half as much. but the radius of the earth is in the region of 6,000 km. so raising your foot an extra meter (which would increase the distance by quite a bit less than a thousandth of a percent) would make a negligible impact on the force felt.
LikeLiked by 1 person
the whole question of gravity is illusionary and has never been proven or applied on objects smaller than Earth, Moon, Sun, etc. We have no idea how to measure the mass of Earth as the Cavendish Experiment, taught to all indoctrinating Universities sell the same lie. Two objects “attracted” to one another emit force on one another…then why doesn’t a tennis ball and bowling ball move one another, one person vs. another, etc. it’s all a big lie. Gravitis means “weight” it is simply density, weight and shape that “falls” on a flat plane.
LikeLike
Your first argument seems to be “It’s a lie, it doesn’t exist”. Next you ask why the forces don’t exist on objects the size of bowling balls or people. The answer is that the force of gravity is exerted between objects that small, but because the force is directly proportional to the product of the two masses, and seeing as a bowling ball or a human being are barely the tiniest fraction of the mass of a planet, the force exerted is minuscule. It however can be demonstrated under extremely controlled circumstances measuring the experiment with accurate tools. Things like the Cavendish experiment. Why you say that is a lie? I don’t know, but the theory of gravitation makes a prediction that if you can remove the forces of friction and a controlled environment then you should be able to observe the force of attraction between two masses, Cavendish style experiments are consistent with that.
In any case you obviously believe that there is some kind of ‘downward’ force that accounts for weight and the fact that things fall, you also seem to want to call it anything but gravity, so can you explain the theory that explains this phenomenon that is consistent with your world view?
LikeLike
“If you cannot give me a single practical example of “gravity” smaller than the Earth or the Sun, then it is merely heresay, not science!”
The moon?? And millions of other small planets / trabants everywhere in the universe?
Also, of course, every single other object, a bowling ball, a car, … just less strong.
LikeLike
You say there is a conspiricy by NASA to conceal the “fact” that the world is flat. So Russia France Japan China UK ESA India Israel and alledgedly Ukraine Iran and North Korea are all in on it too? As well as the countries that have according to Wikipedia placed satellites in orbit that would also need to include SpaceX and Virgin Galactic, as well as the US Airforce and James May late of Top Gear who all claims to have seen the curvature of Earth from a U2 spy plane in a programme shown on the BBC. Oh, BBC are in on it too!
What about all the other countries and companies putting money into schemes to get into orbit? All part of the con and North Korea is a NASA puppet?
LikeLike
It the Earth is flat please can you explain why sailors lookouts are on the top of masts and why they see the tops of the masts of other ships first? If the Earth is flat as you say then deck level would be as good as a crow’s nest and the whole of another ship would be visible as soon as it was within sight. Would a sufficiently powerful telescope on Mount Everest be able to see the entire world on a clear day?
LikeLike
If the Earth is flat why do we see different constellations in the northern and southern so called hemispheres?
LikeLike
If the earth is flat what can three people with mobile phones in London Vienna and Moscow, and each with a stick stuck in the ground surmise, when the time that the Vienna shortest shadow is later than the London shortest shadow but earlier than the Moscow shortest shadow?
LikeLike
The Nile has a total drop of 5 feet?
According to the internet Khartoum is 381m above “sea level but the Cairo is 23m above sea level. I make the drop on just part of the length of the Nile 358m. You have to hand it to NASA. They haven’t missed a trick or a detail in hiding the “fact” that the world is flat.
LikeLike
Has anybody drawn a map of the flat Earth? Does it account for most human settlements and travel routes? Is it possible to reach the Earth’s edge? Is there any knowledge of what may exist beyond the edge?
Incidentally, the belief in a flat Earth believers is more respectable than the belief in Building 7’s destruction by an office fire. At least it is compatible with everyday visual evidence.
Love,
LikeLike
Let’s just focus on the most basic and easily observable realities. It’s not that hard. No flights into space. No expensive telescopes. No suspect imagery and no assertions without foundation. Just use your own eyes and set aside the zaniness.
As they rise above the horizon and traverse the night sky, the moon, planets and stars do not grow in size — and like the sun as it approaches dusk, they do not shrink in size and fade out of view. They disappear below and behind a well-defined horizon while remaining the exact same size.
There is no possible geometric configuration that can account for these realities except a spherical Earth rotating on its axis. None.
Viewed from the geographical north pole, the North Star (Polaris) is precisely overhead. At or near the Earth’s equator, Polaris can be viewed very near the northern-most horizon while at sea and under ideal nighttime conditions, (and it is precisely the same size). At any point on Earth more than 100 miles or so south of the equator, Polaris is not visible, ever.
With only the most basic grasp of geometry and beyond any doubt, this proves a spherical Earth.
Two people, one located at 45 degrees north latitude and another at 45 degrees south snap a detailed picture of the moon at the same moment. Comparing the pictures, the northern view shows the moon distinctly in the southern sky, and the southern view puts the moon prominently in the northern sky. In addition, the southern view will show the moon’s south pole pointing upward or “upside down” in comparison to the view from the north.
This evidence of a spherical Earth simply cannot be disputed.
Visible to the naked eye and easily identifiable, scores of stars and constellations seen from the southern hemisphere are impossible to view from the northern hemisphere — and visa versa — ever, regardless of seasons.
During any full solar eclipse, the moon passes between the sun and the Earth — approaching from the viewer’s right (west) in the northern hemisphere and (at the same time) from the viewer’s left (also from the west) in the southern hemisphere.
During any lunar eclipse of any significance, the moon passes behind the Earth, which casts an irrefutably curved shadow across the moon’s surface. The moon also approaches from the west into the shadow — but from the left as viewed from the northern hemisphere, and from the viewer’s right in the southern hemisphere.
Both examples are clear and indisputable demonstrations of a spherical Earth, orbited by the moon. No other Earth, moon, sun geometry can possibly support these indisputable observations except the moon orbiting a spherical, rotating Earth and the Earth orbiting the sun.
From any point on Earth, any star or constellation viewed in the night sky at midnight will be exactly 30 degrees (one twelfth of 360 degrees) to the west of that position 30 days later and at midnight. These cycles repeat yearly with clockwork predictability. No other possible reality can explain this except a spherical Earth, rotating on its axis every 24 hours and orbiting the sun every 365.25 days.
What is most interesting — and in the end, most telling — is that having posted this handful of the most basic and easily verified talking points on a number of blogs frequented by the staunchest flat-Earth proponents, no successful challenge or alternate explanation has come forth. Not one.
LikeLike
The Game of Thrones is full of Subliminals of our true reality. The Ice Wall being one of them.
LikeLike
1. The horizon will be at a constant depression angle. Think of swinging a camera 360 degrees on a camera stand.
2. That depression angle does change with altitude, but not very much until one gets high enough. The reason is that the horizon recedes out further the higher one gets thus the depression angle would be ATAN ( height/distance to horizon) where as height gets larger so does distance to the horizon as well).
3-5 Water does not maintain level so much as an equi-potential surface where the sum of the fores fat on it the same. At the equator you have both gravity and centripetal force where at the poles there is just gravity. Thus rivers can run up hill just as a spinning cylinder water could curve upward.
6. Not sure what test this refers. But other test show that it does curve. Consider inertial navigation system where gyros do in fcat maintain a local level. they only do so because they have to be torqued to counter earth curvature.. BTW, I have yet to ever see a flat earther even mention inertial navigation systems in their arguments. And I suspect there are two reasons. 1. they are ignorant of them, and 2. they completely debunk the flat earth argument. But they have been around for 50 years or so and are in all airliners. So if one wants to learn for themselves about them here are a few good links one might check out as a starter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_navigation_system
This show how they are aligned. In Ground alignment the inertial navigation system actually uses earth curvature to determine true north.
This video show how they maintain local level
with inertail navigation systems one does not have to limit their test to just a few miles but aircraft use them as they fly thousands of miles.
Here is a video that shows an inertial navigation system in operation for a MIG 21 fighter aircraft
Here is a link to some books
LikeLike
Michael, you won’t be getting any sort of decent response to your points. The proponents of FE are just running a psyop. Here’s a typical exchange.
FE guy: “The bible says xyz, therefore the Earth is flat!”
sane, non-shill person: “The bible is a bunch of stories, not a science text.”
FE guy: “I didn’t say it was! Shut up and get chipped like the rest of the sheeple! How do you explain the great rivers going uphill!? Water can’t go against gravity!”
sane, non-shill person: “Gravity acts perpendicular the tangent of any particular spot. Each bit of water flows “down” relative to its current position. You can’t appeal to science (“rivers cant go uphill!”) and simultaneously deny it.”
FE guy: “That’s what you’ve been taught! Gravity is a lie!”
san, non-shell person: “You’re making up your own science while having no actual background in science or even awareness of the scientific method.”
FE guy: “Haha! We’ll see what you have to say when you’re sitting in an NWO FEMA camp!”
This is typical. FE is a psyop looking for the weakest and most vulnerable minds to exploit.
I realize my comment won’t get posted, but at least the moderator will read it.
LikeLike
ah you’re getting more and more shillspecious by the moment uhmno!!!
you’re saying things not said by me ore on this blog.
you fail to even point out one salient agreement with anything presented on my blog or address basic observation like seeing the Sun moving overhead each day!
this is not a psyop of any kind just trying to educate, alert and inform.
you want to believe it to be a conspiracy to deceive, then simply move on, this site and others like it are not for closed minds and stoned belief systems of government propaganda. move on dude. move on.
LikeLike
Apparently, Polaris (which living in the southern hemisphere I have personally never seen)is directly overhead at the North Pole. Earth is apparently 93 million miles away from the Sun orbiting it once a year,giving Earth an orbit with a diameter of 186 million miles(funny how light travels at 186 million miles a second huh?) and during Earths orbit around the Sun the Earth is tilted 23.4 degrees apparently giving our seasons as the Sun illuminates each hemisphere right? How is it during this great 186 million mile Orbit where the Earth oscillates through this degree of tilt that Polaris remains directly overhead ALL year long?
LikeLike
That’s 186 thousand, not million, miles a second, but are you implying there is something more than just a coincidence in seeing the number 186 twice? A NASA conspiracy perhaps?
What is your explanation for the behaviour of Polaris and to a slightly lesser extent Sigma Octanis, and how does it relate to the flat/globe question anyway, other than as you can’t see Polaris from where you are the world must at least be curved?
LikeLike
First of all, nothing is exactly here. Polaris isn’t exactly the center. Orbits are almost always elliptical so the distance varies. Light speed is approximately 186 000 miles per second, the precise number is 299792458 meters per second.
Movement decreases with distance. Things on the horizon hardly move even if you move a hundred meters. Polaris is 300 – 400 light years away, let’s say 350. So if the diameter of earths orbit is 17 light minutes, Polaris is 350 * 365 * 24 * 60 = 183 960 000 light minutes away. Earths orbit is tiny, compared to that distance. The changes are so small that you can’t measure them with amateur equipment. You can measure it with the moon, who is much closer. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax
LikeLike
And don’t say its because Polaris is a really long long way away unless you have some reproduceable way of proving it to me independent of because NASA says so!
LikeLike
Now that’s easy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax Whenever you have to points from where you watch something, you can measure the distance between the two points and the viewing angles. That gives you a method to calculate the distance. The moon has a distinct parallax because he’s very near. You can measure it yourself if you use nearby objects. Now, the nearest stars still have a measurable parallax if you use expensive equipment, but most stars have almost or practically 0. That can only mean they are far away.
LikeLike
1) The horizon always appears perfectly flat 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur balloon, rocket, plane and drone footage show a completely flat horizon over 20+ miles high. Only NASA and other government “space agencies” show curvature in their fake CGI photos/videos.
Malarkey. If an amoeba, (500,000 times smaller than a grain of sand), found itself on the surface of an apple, by rising above the apple by 1/300 the thickness of the apple’s skin, would it detect the apple’s curvature or size? Would the amoeba need to “look down” to see any horizon in any direction?
The cruising altitude of a commercial jet is 7 to 9 miles. That’s 1 1/1000th, (0.1%), of the Earth’s diameter.
At 20 miles altitude, that’s 0.0025 or 0.25%. Imagine the amoeba having risen above the apple 1/150th the thickness of the apples skin — could it detect the apple’s curvature?
Could a person detect the curve, shape or size of a circular baseball stadium that was 1,000 feet in diameter with their eyes 20 to 24 inches from any exterior wall?
2) The horizon always rises to the eye level of the observer as altitude is gained, so you never have to look down to see it. If Earth were in fact a globe, no matter how large, as you ascended the horizon would stay fixed and the observer / camera would have to tilt looking down further and further to see it.
Simplistic tripe borne of a complete non-grasp of scales and ratios.
(See #1).
3) The natural physics of water is to find and maintain its level. If Earth were a giant sphere tilted, wobbling and hurdling through infinite space then truly flat, consistently level surfaces would not exist here. But since Earth is in fact an extended flat plane, this fundamental physical property of fluids finding and remaining level is consistent with experience and common sense.
Vague double-speak and balderdash. The Earth’s mass creates gravity. Gravity can be well-described as a universal magnet, attracting all matter in proportion to its mass and doing so in all directions equally and simultaneously. Al bodies of water follow the Earth’s curvature as do the land masses — terrain matters notwithstanding.
4) Rivers run down to sea-level finding the easiest course, North, South, East, West and all other intermediary directions over the Earth at the same time. If Earth were truly a spinning ball then many of these rivers would be impossibly flowing uphill, for example the Mississippi in its 3000 miles would have to ascend 11 miles before reaching the Gulf of Mexico.
More stubborn ignorance. What does “uphill” mean? Uphill denotes a location farther from the center of the Earth. Water always flows downhill. The mouths of all rivers are lower, (closer to the Earth’s center), than the waters that are “uphill” — otherwise rivers would be very long and narrow lakes that did not flow.
5) One portion of the Nile River flows for a thousand miles with a fall of only one foot. Parts of the West African Congo, according to the supposed inclination and movement of the ball-Earth, would be sometimes running uphill and sometimes down. This would also be the case for the Parana, Paraguay and other long rivers.
A thorough obliviousness to matters of hydraulics and fluid dynamics.
To quote from the statement: “One portion of the Nile River flows for a thousand miles with a fall of only one foot.”
That’s precisely why the Nile river flows very, very slowly among this portion of it. Any river’s rate of flow depends on the local downward incline in the terrain, width and depth, and volume of water available from it’s sources.
6) If Earth were a ball 25,000 miles in circumference as NASA and modern astronomy claim, spherical trigonometry dictates the surface of all standing water must curve downward an easily measurable 8 inches per mile multiplied by the square of the distance. This means along a 6 mile channel of standing water, the Earth would dip 6 feet on either end from the central peak. Every time such experiments have been conducted, however, standing water has proven to be perfectly level.
The demonstrations, such as the Bedford Level experiment, completely ignored matters of light refraction, (especially over large bodies of water), and other atmospheric influences on optical observations at distance.
Even if light was heavily refracted at distance, examples of Earth’s curvature can be found here:
Sailboat going gradually behind and below the horizon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nUFLLUahSI
And here:
Large schooner goes past and disappears behind the horizon — from the hull upward: https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=35&v=dV0h68YU0iQ
And here:
Clear demonstration of Earth’s curvature on the Thames River, (skip to 5:00 to get to the beef):
LikeLike
“what does uphill mean?” Seriously?
maybe a need to re-attend elementary school for better programming Sir?
LikeLike
Nice try. Gravity is not magic. Wake up and see the horizon. It’s flat not round.
LikeLike
Your wrong the earth is flat. It is from South Wales to north Cornwall.
LikeLike
If we’re spinning 1000 boats don’t allow for curvature, use a BUBBLE LEVEL. IF ALL THIS AND BELOW ISNT ENOUGH, THEY THORW IN OUR FACE A FLAT EARTH UN MAP. AND MANY MORE SUCKERS!!! Planes would fly off into space if they didn’t nose down on a RE model. Plus, water seeks level and its damn FLAT as i can see it from Mexico to Malibu. How does tons of ocean stick to a round ball? Gravity is a fantasy, non proven myth. DOZENS OF Lighthouses are seen FROM SEA for miles without sinking below horizon PROVING NO curvature. Chicago ENTIRELY visible 60 MILES away form Michigan! NO CURVATURE!
MORE INFO WHILE ON A ROLL AS IM A TRUTH SEEKER! KUBRICK DIRECTED THE FAKED APOLLO LANDING. NASA MYSTERIOUSLY ‘lost” all footage of most important historical event after all these blatant mistakes were questioned. no landing force impact, morphing vessels all in tiny rocket. ROVER, MOON MODULE, LANDING MODULE. COME ON! coach voicing ‘Talk” to allow for supposed lag time to astronuts who PHYSICALLY attack anyone asking them to swear on bible when questioned. departing shot leaving camera dude behind, same background 2 diff days when “exploring moon”, no stars, etc.etc. Many bloopers pointed out all over you tube. NASA JUST ADMITTED WE CANNOT TRAVERSE DEADLY VAN ALLEN RADIATION BELTS. RON HOWARD RECENTLY TOLD ABOUT WATCHING IT BEING FILMED FROM RAFTERS ABOVE SET. AND KUBRICK LEFT MANY CLUES IN LATER MOVIES: THE SHINING, WITH DANNYS APOLLO 11 SWEATER LAUCNH PAD CARPET, ROOM NO 237. INVERT LETTERS…(MOON 237K PURPORTED MILES) ACTUALLY MUCH CLOSER, AS I AND OTHERS HAVE SEEN CLOUDS PASSING BEHIND IT. ON U TUBE THERES MORE FOOTAGE. HIS MOVIE “BEING THERE” SHOWS A MOON MOVIE SET PIC IN A STORE WINDOW. NASA WAS STARTED BY NAZIS WE IMPORTED FROM HITCHERS ARMY. WHY THE RUSE I HAVE NOP IDEA, THE BIBLE SAYS THE EARTH HSAS 4 CORNERS AND UNMOVED. WE CANNOT PENETRATE THE FIRMAMENT (DOME). I disagree with author who feels dome is 7000 miles. MANY PRIVATE COS HAVE TRIED AND FAILED TO SURPASS 72 APPROX MILES BEFORE HITTING THE GLASS DOME..
LikeLike
Nice RANT!
LikeLike
When I was at school we were told never to look at the sun as it would blind you.RUBBISH!!!. I look at the sun every day through one eye to focus on it and then open the other eye and can see the sun perfectly every time.What do I see? The sun blocks out the blue of the sky which is seen behind it.So the sun is inside the blue part of the sky and so is the moon, which also blocks out the portion of the sky it is in front of. The sun and moon are both seen in the daytime so when that happens one can see both luminaries at the same time.So what am I getting at? The sun and moon are inside the FIRMANENT of the heavens and the stars are in the firmament and were placed there by the Creator.
The best book to research this fact is the book of Enoch available online.The bible is a flat earth book stating the earth has foundations and it shall not be moved.
Now let us just reason together. Would the Creator put the sun 93,000,000 miles away to heat our earth down here and how does the heat travel through a vacuum that NASA says is out there.No the sun is about 3250 miles above the flat earth and so is the moon.Both the sun and moon travel over the earth each day( BOOK OF ENOCH ) Both the sun and moon are about 35 miles in diameter.
The sun is supposedly 400 times bigger than the earth!!! Rubbish. A creator with intelligence would not be an energy waster and put the source of heat so far away from what it must heat.
Does that make sense or do all cognisant dissonance people have blinkers on?
I flew back from Washington Dulles on Tuesday last week and asked the stewards about the earth and guess what they said? They said after flying for years that they know the earth is flat. I have a client who is an instrument technician with the SA air force and he says that the false horizon on the flight panel as well as the gyroscope prove the earth is flat.
OH YES WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO BY THE JESUITS AND THE CATHOLIC CHURCH.
LikeLike
[…] Scaricatelo, distribuitelo, svegliate le coscienze e indottrinate le stolte masse, la Terra è piatta come una tavola. Se non ci credete, Eric è pronto a mostrarvi una serie di esempi che vi convinceranno di sicuro, direttamente dal suo ebook: […]
LikeLike
You are a complete moron. Science and exploration explain many of the so called proofs that you claim. This has made you sound like a complete idiot and doesn’t do a damn thing to explain mysterious occorances. It only makes any explanation of it as a joke.
LikeLike
[…] andate sul suo sito trovate tutti i dettagli, oltre a poter scaricare un divertente ebook (https://aplanetruth.info/2015/08/04/200-proofs-earth-in-not-a-spinning-ball/ ) che in 200 punti vi convincerà che la terra è piatta, che la forza di gravità non esiste, che […]
LikeLike
[…] andate sul suo sito trovate tutti i dettagli, oltre a poter scaricare un divertente ebook (https://aplanetruth.info/2015/08/04/200-proofs-earth-in-not-a-spinning-ball/ ) che in 200 punti vi convincerà che la terra è piatta, che la forza di gravità non esiste, che […]
LikeLike
[…] andate sul suo sito trovate tutti i dettagli, oltre a poter scaricare un divertente ebook (https://aplanetruth.info/2015/08/04/200-proofs-earth-in-not-a-spinning-ball/ ) che in 200 punti vi convincerà che la terra è piatta, che la forza di gravità non esiste, che […]
LikeLike
Come on people, all the evidence proves earth is flat. Nasa is a fucking joke. Think we have been to the moon. Then believe the earth is a spinning ball. We have been lied too, to long. The sad part is that people will not believe that they have been had. Can not wait for a global disaster to end all this stupidity.
LikeLike