Category Archives: Moon

The Stars Declare the Truth

Really Good Dot Connecting and historical Flat Earth narrative by Richard. Learn and enjoy

The Stars Declare the Truth

The aim of this post is to present an accurate and comprehensive picture of what the stars are and how they move in the night sky, as simple observation tells us that they are not at all what NASA tell us that they are.

It is also my hope that this post may inspire you to look upon the night sky with new eyes and with renewed child-like curiosity.


Image result for star gazing quotes



Note to new readers:

If you are new to this blog, please note that this is article #27 in a series of articles that have been presented as a chronological and logical narrative.

That being the case, you may find it useful to read from the start (follow the links in the header above), or to at least check out the Table of Contents page for a “spark-notes” summary of previous material discussed in this blog, before continuing here. The recap below might also offer some useful guidance.



This post will build upon material presented in earlier posts, particularly what was presented in Post #16 through to Post #24.

Here is a quick summary to refresh your memory of what was covered in those posts:


To round things off, here’s a quick summary of what we’ve looked at in this post:

To start, we saw that the sun is not a star, and that the stars are not at all what we’ve been told.

You were then shown some videos involving cymatics, sonoluminescence, superconductivity, and quantum levitation, which go a long way to explaining what we are seeing in the sky.

We then moved on to deconstructing the parallax lie, before taking a dreamy look at star trails and the amazing astrolabe, which led us to study the astroplate.

In other words, a lot of awesome stuff that proves that we’ve been lied to about the stars.


This post has shone plenty of light on the lies we’ve been fed by these guys…


Related image


… but what you’ve seen so far doesn’t even scratch the surface of the knowledge being hidden from you.

Rest assured though, we’re going to be slicing through many more of their lies and hidden knowledge like a hot knife cutting through butter, so stay tuned! 🙂


Faked Moon Landing | As Seen On TV over the Decades

The Flat Earth Story of the Tortoise and The Rabbit (Hedgehog)



In cultural astronomy there is a global flat plane earth practice of identifying the shape of a hare or a rabbit on the disk of the moon. In Mesoamerican glyphs, Indian Vedic Panchatantra, China, and Europe, there are many examples.

The clear description in Grimm’s fairy tale of Hare and Hedgehog of a race lasting 73 circuits represents the five divisions of the year by the Moon’s periods and has a parallel in the arrangement of St. Mary’s feast days over the year. Old farmer’s calendar symbols, still in use confirm this assumption. The race of the hare and hedgehog mirrors the orbits of Sun and Moon and ends with blood shooting out of the hare’s neck, which describes a red total lunar eclipse. Other data in the fable allow us to find when this eclipse could have happened, and we see there is only one perfectly matching date in the past 2000 years.

This article presents you with an astronomical and calendrical interpretation of the fairy tale “The Hare and the Hedgehog” which offers us an opportunity to date it. Similar stories exist in about 60 different versions, but common to all is a race between the slow and the fast. The archaeoastronomical and calendrical view explains it as the movement of the sun and moon. The slow sun is played by a hedgehog, tortoise, crab, pig, or snail; the faster moon by a hare, fox, wolf, stag, birds, or the devil.
The “Hare and The Hedgehog” is a popular old fairy tale and was first published in the Northern German dialect “Plattdeutsch by Wilhelm Schröder in 1840 after he heard the story at “Buxhoevden“. In 1843, the Brothers Grimm added it to the 5th edition of their Kinder und Hausmärchen.

At the 74th run of Hare and Hedgehog, blood runs out of the hare’s neck and it dies. This can be identified as a total lunar eclipse and gives us an opportunity to date it.

The Hare and the Hedgehog” (now usually the Tortoise and Hare) where the two have a race, the Sun character starts out much faster but then tires out, gets lazy, slows down, or takes a rest and is ultimately overtaken by the Moon character who wins the race. As for the exact path the Moon follows during this celestial “race,” I think it follows the exact same path I described for the Sun, except in a “slow and steady wins the race” fashion, it doesn’t speed up as the circles get wider, nor does it slow down as the circles get narrower, the Moon simply keeps trudging along and eventually overtakes the Sun during the second eclipse and wins the race back to the Tropic of Cancer. Does anyone else have any insight on this or found any relevant passages in old flat Earth material?




Excellent New Flat Earth Coffee Table Book by DIRTH

Excellent book by David Weiss.

DITRH Presents – The Flat Earth Flip Book
Image result for domed flat earth

A coffee table book to help start the conversation with friends and family. Thanks to all the people that created the meme ideas that were used and inspiring me to make some new ones. The books construction is absolutely amazing. Super high quality paper, sown hardcover perfect binding. Has a paper cover sleeve with the same image embedded in the matt coated hard cover. The book is 100 pages and cost $109 from Apple plus tax and shipping. A bit expensive but you don’t get what you don’t pay for. I am happy to share the files so you can assemble your own book or I can order one for you with no markup and have Apple ship it to you. Wont be able to do it until the weekend of anyone is interested.

Moon Reflecting Sunlight onto Earth Theory Is an Absurdity!

Unedited NASA footage of “moon landing” – You still don’t believe in a flat earth?

Unedited NASA footage of “moon landing” – You still don’t believe in a flat earth?

How Did The Kings of Astronomy Get it So Wrong? – Einstein and the Still Earth


It will be remembered how Hipparchus failed to get an angle to the stars 2,000 years ago, and arrived at the conclusion that they must be infinitely distant; and we have seen how that hypothesis has been handed down to us through all the centuries without question.
~ G. Hickson ~


This article/post is mostly taken from the work of Gerard Hickson in his 1922 book, “Kings Dethroned”.  He lays clearly, concisely and irrefutably, how astronomer by astronomer in the 16th and 17th centuries began in error by the way they measured distance from Earth to Sun, Moon and planets and then subsequently came up with preposterous theory after theory, over decades, to cover up there errors, that continues to this very day.

From Copernicus, Galileo, Kepler, Halley, Newton in Europe across the pond in the 1900’s to Einstein and NASA, astronomy has used the same errors in calculating distance of stars and planets in what is called Astrometry.

In the 1920’s, Gerrard Hickson proves conclusively, using their own geometry, math and theories of heliocentrism, gravity, relativity, etc., are gravely in gross error.

In no uncertain terms this work blows apart the Sun centered, Earth a sphere rotating, gravity based heliocentric theory that has been taught in every classroom on our flat plane Earth for the past century or more.



(Original book title)

Kings Dethroned; A History of the Evolution of Astronomy from the time of the Roman Empire up to the present day; showing it to be an amazing set of blunders founded upon an error made in the Second Century B C.


Relative Phantasmagoria
“But I can conceive that in the course of time this Relative Phantasmagoria
might come to be regarded as science,
and be taught as such to the children of the near future.”
~ G. Hickson, April 1921, in reference to
newly proposed Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein


It would seem that Copernican Astronomy had reached its highest development about the year 1882, and then began to decline, or rather, to fall to pieces.

The first evidence of this devolution is to be found in the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887, at Chicago; the result of which might have undeceived even the most devoted believer in the theory of a spinning earth.

Professor Michelson was one of the physicists foremost in determining the Velocity of Light, while he has recently been described in the New York Times as America’s greatest physicist; and it was he who—working in collaboration with Morley— in 1887 made the most painstaking experiments by means of rays of light for the purpose of testing, verifying, or proving by physical science, what really was the velocity of the earth.

To express this more clearly. Astronomers have for a very long time stated that the earth travels
round the sun with a speed of more than eighteen miles a second, or sixty-six thousand miles an hour.

Without in any way seeking to deny this statement, but really believing it to be thereabouts correct, Michelson and Morley undertook their experiments in order to put it to a practical test; just in the same way as we might say “The greengrocer has sent us a sack of potatoes which is said to contain 112 pounds weight; we will weigh it ourselves to see if that is correct.”

The apparent movement of stars around a still earth

More technically, the experiment was to test what was the velocity with which the earth moved in its orbit round the sun relative to the aether. A very well illustrated account of that experiment will be found in The Sphere, published in London, June 11th, 1921, and it is from that article I quote the following, verbatim :

“But to the experimenters’ surprise no difference was discernible. The experiment was tried through numerous angles, but the motion through the aether was NIL”!

Observe that the means employed represented the best that modern physical science could do to prove the movement of the earth through ethereal space, and the result showed that the earth did not move at all! “The motion through the aether was NIL.

But the world of astronomy has not accepted that result, for it continues to preach the old dogma; it appears that they are willing to accept the decisions of physicists when it suits their case, but reject them when otherwise.

And so they still maintain the fabulous theory that the earth is rushing through space at eleven hundred miles a minute; which, as they would say in America, ” Surely is some traveling.” It must be faster than a bullet from a Lewis gun.

What I have now to record, I do with regret, and only because my sense of duty in the pursuit of truth compels me. It is the circumstance that Sir George Airy, who retired from his position as Astronomer Royal in 1881, related— some nine years later— how he had for some time been harassed by a suspicion that certain errors had crept into some of the computations published in 1866, and that, though he had set himself seriously to the work of revision, his powers were no longer what they had been, and he was never able to examine sufficiently into the work.

Then he spoke of a “grievous error that had been committed in one of the first steps,” and pathetically added —“My spirit in the work was broken, and I have never heartily proceeded with it since.” My sympathy goes out to Sir George in his tribulation of the spirit due to advancing age, while I am not unmindful of myself, for I realize that in him I have lost one who would have been a friend, who would have listened when I said that all was not as it should be with the science of astronomy; and stood by my side, encouraging and helping, when I, younger and stronger, strove to put it right.

I do not know whether Sir George Airy was influenced or not by the result of the Michelson-Morley experiment, but it is at least a noteworthy coincidence that he made those comments only three years later; but in any case science has need of him, and of such evident open-mindedness and sincerity as his, now not content to believe that the earth did not move, further experiments were carried out by Nordmeyer in the year 1903, to test the earth’s velocity in relation to the Intensities of Light from the heavenly bodies, but he also failed to discover any movement.

Continue reading