Flat Earth Gallery I

It may be boldly asked where can the man be found, possessing the extraordinary gifts of Newton, who could suffer himself to be deluded by such a hocus-pocus, if he had not in the first instance willfully deceived himself;

Only those who know the strength of self-deception, and the extent to which it sometimes trenches on dishonesty, are in a condition to explain the conduct of Newton and of Newton’s school. To support his unnatural theory Newton heaps fiction upon fiction, seeking to dazzle where he cannot convince.

In whatever way or manner may have occurred this business, I must still say that I curse this modern history theory of Cosmology, and hope that perchance there may appear, in due time, some young scientists of genius, who will pick u courage enough to upset this universally disseminated delirium of lunatics.  ~ Goethe

 

 

*****

“And out of those two halves he formed heaven and earth, between them the middle sphere, the eight points of the horizon, and the eternal abode of the waters.”
The Laws of Manu
1. Aditya (the sun) is Brahman.
In the beginning this was non-existent. It became existent, it grew. It turned into an egg. The egg lay for the time of a year. The egg broke open. The two halves were one of silver, the other of gold.
2. The silver one became this earth, the golden one the sky, the thick membrane (of the white) the mountains, the thin membrane (of the yoke) the mist with the clouds, the small veins the rivers, the fluid the sea.
3. And what was born from it that was Aditya, the sun. When he was born shouts of hurrah arose, and all beings arose, and all things which they desired. Therefore whenever the sun rises and sets, shouts of hurrah arise, and all beings arise, and all things which they desire.
Khandogya-Upanishad Part 2, Third Prapathaka Nineteenth Khanda

****

 

The Churning of the Milky Ocean (Milky Way) is a famous and sacred teaching from the Hindu text the Mahabharata.  To churn the ocean they used the Serpent King, Vasuki, for their churning-string. For a churning pole they use Mount Mandara placed on the back of a Great Tortoise – the Kurma Avatar of Vishnu. As the gods and demons churned the sea, a terrible poison issued out of its depths which enveloped the universe.
****
****

The Maize God is reborn from a turtle carapace by his sons the Hero Twins.  This turtle is the double-headed turtle that cracks open for the rebirth of the Maize God (seen as a serpent below).

****
 

In the Aztec creation story, as the gods continued to create, they had a problem – their creations would fall into the water and be eaten by the dreadful Cipactli.  So it was time for war – the four gods attacked the sea monster, pulling her in four directions.  She fought back, biting Tezcatlipoca and tearing off his foot.  But at last Cipactli was destroyed.  From this enormous creature the universe was created.  All the 13 heavens stretch into her head.  The earth was created in the middle, and her tail reaches down to the underworld (Mictlán) (nine underworlds, to be exact).   You could say that in the Aztec creation story the world is on the back of this sea monster, floating in the water of space (reminiscent of the Iroquois belief that the world rests on the back of a turtle).

****

firmament genesis_cosmology

****

CHINA

In Ancient Chinese, the early Jesuit scholars were the first Europeans to gain access to the Chinese ‘book of all knowledge’ from ancient times. This 4,320-volume collection told of the repercussions of mankind’s rebellion against the gods: “The Earth was shaken to its foundations. The sky sank lower towards the north. The sun, moon, and stars changed their motions.  The Earth fell to pieces and the waters in its bosom rushed upwards with violence and overflowed the Earth.

The legend of Nvwa Mending the Sky is one of the most representative myths about the world creation in ancient China. Legend has it that in remote antiquity, the four pillars supporting the sky suddenly broke and as a result, the sky had chasms and couldn’t fully cover the earth. The land on earth also spilt open and couldn’t sustain things on top of it. At that time, raging flames ripped through the earth, where torrential flood water, ferocious beasts and birds also wrecked havoc on people’s lives.
Seeing that human beings were suffering such disasters, Nvwa tried everything she could to mend the sky. She selected all types of five-coloured stones, melted them into slurry over fire and filled the chasms with the slurry. Later, she cut off the feet of a big turtle to prop up the sky. Afterwards, she killed the black dragon that caused floods and other disasters and the ferocious beasts and birds harming people. At last, she burnt reeds into ashes and piled them up to block flood water. Thus, disasters were conquered and mankind was saved.

There was a fight between the god of water Gonggong and the god of fire Zhurong. When Gonggong lost the fight, he smashed his head against Mount Buzhou out of fury. Since Mount Buzhou was a pillar holding up the sky, the sky began to fall and caused a lot of damage. Because of that, people’s lives became miserable. Nüwa was really concerned about her people so she picked out colourful stones in Mount Tiantai and used them to seal the broken sky. In this way peace and happiness returned to mankind.

Belief in a flat Earth is found in mankind’s oldest writings. In early Mesopotamian thought, the world was portrayed as a flat disk floating in the ocean, and this forms the premise for early Greek maps such as those of Anaximander and Hecataeus of Miletus.

Some theologians and biblical researchers maintain that at least some of the writers of the Old Testament books of the Bible had a Babylonian world view, according to which Earth is flat and stands on pillars, and is covered by a solid sky-dome (the Firmament). The firmament was the heaven in which God set the sun ( Psalm 19:5) and the stars ( Gen 1:14). The flat earth concept appears to be mentioned in ( Isaiah 40:22) where it speaks of God “dwelling above the circle of earth” which means a literal circle, from the Hebrew word “chuwg”.

*****

Gleason's new standard map of the world

https://www.digitalcommonwealth.org/search/commonwealth:7h149v85z

****

The Antarctic Ice Circle around the Flat Earth

****

$5,000 for Proving the Earth is a Globe
by JAY EARLE MILLER

Post and Gatty didn’t fly around the world, according to Wilbur Glenn Voliva, they merely flew in a circle around the North Pole. This article presents Voliva’s theory of a flat world, and tells you how you can win his offer of $5,000 for proving that he is wrong.

WOULD you like to earn $5,000? If you can prove that the world is a sphere, floating in space, turning on its own axis, revolving around the sun, you can earn a prize of that amount. Such a prize has been posted for years, offered by Wilbur Glenn Voliva, general overseer of Zion, 111., home of the Christian Catholic Apostolic Church, founded some thirty years ago by the late John Alexander Dowie.

Many have tried to claim the $5,000—and all have failed. The catch is that your proof must not start with the assumption that the world is round, or rather a globe, for Voliva believes the world is round, but a round, flat disc rather than a sphere. Without that basic premise that the earth is spherical no one has found an absolutely convincing proof that Voliva is wrong when he describes his disc-shaped world, firmly planted on its foundations, surrounded by a wall of ice to keep mariners from falling off the edge, and surmounted by a crystal dome in which the stars are hung like chandeliers to light the night. Nor can you submit proof to absolutely disprove the belief of Voliva that the sun, instead of being an 800,000 mile ball of fire more than ninety millions of miles away is really a fairly insignificant affair, only some 27 to 30 miles in diameter and about 3,000 miles above the earth. Or that the sun and moon move in orbits while the earth stands still, that the moon is about the same size as the sun and the same distance from the earth, shines by its own light, and moves in much the same orbit as the sun.

****

“They want you to believe that the Moon’s rotation is perfectly synchronized with its orbit so that’s why we only ever see one side of the Moon, rather than conclude the obvious – that the Moon is simply NOT rotating. Moreover, they had to slow down the Moon’s speed by 58,870 mph AND reverse its direction to West-East to successfully sell their phony heliocentricity system to a gullible public. I don’t think there is one person in many, many thousands – regardless of education – who knows that the Copernican Model had to turn the Moon’s observable direction around and give it a new speed to accommodate the phases and eclipses.” -Marshall Hall

What makes the orbital rings expand and contract to inner and outer limits of seasons is unknown and another mystery.

Believe them or your own lying eyes?

Sun and Moon are same size. Moon is luminous and pourous. Antarctic is a South CIRCLE not a pole which holds in one OCEAN. Sun and moon are said to be 233 miles wide and some 3000 miles above us on our plane earth.

“Circular sailing no more proves the world to be a globe than an equilateral triangle. The sailing round the world would, of course, take very much longer, but, in principle, it is exactly the same as that of the yachtsman circumnavigating the Isle of Wight. Let me give a simple illustration. A boy wants to sail his iron toy boat by a magnet, so he gets a basin, in the middle of which he places a soap-dish, or anything else which he may think suitable to represent the Earth, and then fills the basin with water to display the sea.

He puts in his boat and draws it by the magnet round his little world. But the boat never passes over the rim to sail under the basin, as if that were globular, instead of being simply circular. So is it in this world of ours; from the extreme South we can sail from East to West or from West to East around it, but we cannot sail from North to South or from South to North, for we cannot break through intervening lands, nor pass the impenetrable ramparts of ice and rocks which enclose the great Southern Circumference.” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma”

Astrosphere

*****

****

Flat Earthers look up to Sky where beads (stars) through the firmament shine, meaning there is a light outside of the darkness of our enclosed capsule.

 

****

 

****

1,000 mph revolution everyday, 1,000 mp/second around the Sun and over 500 mph trucking around the Solar System and we feel nothing.

****

NASA 3D Imagery.  Antarctic CIRCLE surrounding a Flat Earth!

****

IN PLAIN SIGHT; Dept of Defense Official Logo, Oval Earth, NO Antarctica

 

US Dept of State

United Nations Emblem w/o AnTarctic shown on Flat Earth plus Freemason outlay.

The UN building is 39 (13x3) stories high and sits on land donated by Mason David Rockefeller. The United Nations flag shows the globe divided into 33 sections encircled by olive branches. The flag also happens to be blue just like the first 3 “blue degrees” of Masonry. There are 13 degrees of York-Rite Masonry and 33 degrees of Scottish-Rite.

****

****

English musician Thomas Dolby released an album called The Flat Earth, has used the name Flat Earth Society for his website forums, and has linked to information relating to the flat earth myth. Thomas Dolby also holds the place as the first member since the Flat Earth Society reopened membership.

Google Earth Day Logo

*****

The Hunab Ku  symbolises the source, the cosmic essence of our being. It is the ‘womb of creation’ from which all the stars and planets of our galaxy, including our Solar System, have been created.
This is the most sacred symbol for the Highest Authority of the Milky Way galaxy in Maya tradition.

I smote the earth and broke it as an egg is broken; for I would cut loose the bound in heaven. Then all the tribes of men cried out: There is a Mazda! An All Power Unseen!”
I’hua’Mazda said, Book of God’s Word, Ch. I
****

 The ancient goddess Nuit is an archetype of the nights sky.  She is often depicted as being “held up.”

In this ancient depiction, the sun god has wings, and also has two serpents, and it sits behind the stars. Notice the boats too.
****
*****
*****
IRAN

Greater Bundahishn CH XXXIV:
16. During the performance of that renovation of the universe [Frashegird], those holy men and women will come to the help of Soshyant.
17. And as [the dragon] Gochihr within the celestial sphere shall fall from the base of the moon on to the earth, the earth shall have such distress as that of a sheep when a wolf tears off its wool.
18. Then fire and Airyaman Yazad will melt the metal which is within the hills and mountains, and it will remain on this earth like a river.

19. And then they will cause all men to pass into that melted metal, and will make them pure.
And the dragon Gochihr will be burnt by that melted metal, [and the metal will flow into the wicked existence, and] the stench and contamination within [the earth,where] the wicked existence was, will be consumed by that metal, and it will become pure. The hollow where through the Evil Spirit had entered is closed with that metal.

32. They will bring that wicked existence of the earth back to the expanse of the world, and there will be renovation [frashegird] in the universe, the world will become immortal at will, up to eternity and eternal progress.

In the Iranian Bundahishn the “targets over the sky” are called the ‘Path of Kayus’ (Milky Way), and the Path of the Dragon Gochihr (the great one of the middle of the sky) is presumably the ecliptic, since the seven planets are the head and tail of Gochihar.

Gochihr stood in the middle of the sky, like a dragon, its Head in Gemini and Tail in Sagittarius, as there are always six constellations betwixt its Head and Tail; its motion is backward; every ten years, its tail returns there where is its head and its head returns there where is its tail.

****

****

Chaco Canyon New Mexico “Sundagger” Faja da butte

 

 

*****

The Vedas also speak of a “submarine fire” which:

”  …consumeth the waters of the great Ocean, [and which] became like unto a large horse’s head which persons conversant with the Vedas call by the name of Vadavamukha. And emitting itself from that mouth it consumeth the waters of the mighty ocean.”

*****

 

****

 

***
****
I smote the earth and broke it as an egg is broken; for I would cut loose the bound in heaven. Then all the tribes of men cried out: There is a Mazda! An All Power Unseen!”
I’hua’Mazda said, Book of God’s Word, Ch. I

The Maya world tree has a serpent in the sky:

Chich’en Itza is a remarkable place, I have been there on the equinox, and during the fall and spring equinoxes, the sun’s shadow forms an enormous snake’s body, which lines up with the carved stone snake head at the bottom of the Castillo pyramid.  It depicts the return of the serpent sun god.

“The Maya name “Chich’en Itza” means “The Mouth of the Well of the Magicians of Water.”  (Water here could read milky way which was known all over the ancient world as an ocean, or it could mean those magicians that can bring water / deluge).

****

 The Systems of the World in 1651 According to Father Riccioli

(this gave the false choice of a spheroid earth being geocentric or heliocentric and eliminated discussion of a stationary flat earth model)

http://www.divine-name.info/museums/riccioli.htm

*****

***

 

****

 

 

“Teach the Controversy,” flat earth.

 

“When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

30 thoughts on “Flat Earth Gallery I

  1. JackDaw January 27, 2016 at 5:23 pm Reply

    I’m writing a blog in Italian about the Plane without a T — i was wondering if I could translate some of your posts and re-post them and/or borrow some of your images, which I found extremely interesting — thank you! JD
    p.s. my blog is here: verorizzonte.blogspot.it

    Like

  2. meh February 16, 2016 at 3:33 am Reply

    so so so stupid is this

    Like

    • george June 11, 2016 at 9:22 am Reply

      why and how are you so sure?….you will be surprised!!….can u handle the truth is the answer!

      Like

    • larry May 4, 2017 at 8:08 pm Reply

      Whys that?

      Like

  3. pharmer February 17, 2016 at 1:01 am Reply

    It’s fascinating pondering the evidence presented – thanks!

    Like

  4. kittyhawk63 March 2, 2016 at 4:27 pm Reply

    In one section you say the moon and sun are 27-33 miles in diameter. In another section you say they both are 233 miles across. Did you accidentally delete the 7 and the dash in the second statement?

    Like

    • jwlpeace March 2, 2016 at 5:49 pm Reply

      FE Models estimate the Moon and Sun to be 27-33 miles in diameter. The Height in the sky said to be 700-3000 miles yet it “feels” and “appears” much closer to me.

      Like

      • bewilderedatman April 23, 2016 at 1:57 am

        “FE Models estimate the Moon and Sun to be 27-33 miles in diameter. The Height in the sky said to be 700-3000 miles”. Yet if the sun or moon were 33 miles in diameter, and only 700 miles away, they would appear about 2.7 degrees wide to the eye. And at 3000 miles away, they’d appear to be about 0.63 degrees wide. Yet both the sun and the moon appear about 0.5 degrees wide, and don’t vary much in angular appearance. The “FE Models” are worthless.

        Like

      • jwlpeace April 23, 2016 at 5:14 pm

        Stay bewildered, stay in your round ball box and all will be fine, okay and secure in your fears of being wrong about everything. we FE’ers understand where you’re coming from, we were like you once too, so we understand your limits and bias.

        Like

  5. rwederfoort April 13, 2016 at 4:50 pm Reply

    Thank you for sharing this GOOD presentation, WELL DONE.
    Namaste

    Like

  6. bewilderedatman April 23, 2016 at 1:51 am Reply

    This site is a joke, right?

    Like

    • jwlpeace April 23, 2016 at 5:14 pm Reply

      Move on Mr. Bewildered, this site is way to confusing if your already using an Avatar “bewildered”.

      Like

    • Frank November 23, 2016 at 5:09 am Reply

      +bewilderedatman Just go away…

      Like

  7. Joe Blo May 10, 2016 at 8:50 am Reply

    All the so called ‘flat earth’ diagrams are so obviously drawn up to display appearances from a Northern hemisphere biased perspective – if you TRULY believe in your erroneous theory i challenge you to come and visit and live with me a while in Australia – South of the Tropic of Cancer and see where the OBVIOUS factual flaws are in all the ‘Northerner’ falacious diagrams. It is a FACT of Nature and indisputable that there is a Southern Celestial pole around which ALL visible stars rotate ( with NO “Pole Star’! – I can truthfully witness it any night of the year) There is also a geographic South Pole as well as a seperate South Magnetic pole . I challenge you to define all three of those on your diagrams.
    If the sun rotates around YOUR North pole once every 24 hours just HOW, exactly, Can it be visible from the shores of Antarctica for 90 days in a row and how is it possible people in the high Northern Latitudes do not see it at all for the same period ( i.e.in Northern Winter. ) When the FACTS such as these are obvious it is a sad self-deluded fool who disregards them or explains them as simply ‘mysteries’.
    Put up ( facts ) that explain what i can prove to be true ( or at the very least better represents our daily reality) – or shut up and wake up to the truth of God’s miraculous Universe.

    Joe Blo

    Like

    • jwlpeace May 10, 2016 at 2:04 pm Reply

      name calling will not be allowed, Sir. We are all just learning and the lie has been massive and one off dismiss us who seek is petty and trite on your part. There are over 465 posts on this site and over 75 vid/docs on YT channel, I guess we who think for ourselves just got it ALL wrong. thanx for setting us straight. I’ll close down the sight immediately now that you corrected us all and demonstrably proved the error of our logic, reason, experiment and own observations. OKAY!

      Like

    • Adam May 10, 2016 at 3:32 pm Reply

      No, the flat earth models and diagrams are drawn up to represent the reality in which we all live. There is no “southern hemisphere”. Everything you stated/asked has been addressed by the flat earth model, you just obviously haven’t done the extensive research/reading required to understand this.

      Courtesy of Eric Dubay read this or watch this video as it provides visuals to the written portion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZP_VZ_Ehvkif you are truly searching the truth of this matter, this all pertains to the “southern hemisphere” and Australia:

      In the Flat-Earth model of the cosmos, the North Pole is the immovable center of the world and the entire universe. Polaris, the North Star, sits straight over the North Pole at the highest point in the heavens, and like a slowly rotating planetarium dome all the celestial bodies revolve around Polaris and over the Earth once per day. The Sun circles over and around the circumference of Earth every 24 hours, steadily traveling each day from the equator during the March vernal equinox, up to the Tropic of Cancer at the June summer solstice, back down to the equator for the September autumnal equinox, and all the way down to the Tropic of Capricorn on the December winter solstice.

      In the Flat-Earth model, the South Pole does not exist at all and Antarctica is instead a gigantic ice-wall extending the circumference of Earth holding in the oceans like a giant bowl, or a “world cup.” As strange as this concept may sound at first, it is a fact that if you set a bearing due South from anywhere on Earth, inevitably at or before 78 degrees Southern latitude, you will find yourself face-to-face with an enormous ice-wall towering 100-200 feet in the air extending to the East and West the entire circumference of the world!

      “The ice-barrier, so frequently referred to in accounts of the Antarctic regions, is the fore-front of the enormous glacier-covering, or ice-cap, which, accumulating in vast, undulating fields from the heavy snowfall, and ultimately attaining hundreds, if not thousands, of feet in thickness, creeps from the continent of Antarctica into the polar sea. The ice-barrier, yet a part of the parent ice-cap, presents itself to the navigator who has boldness enough to approach its fearful front, as a solid, perpendicular wall of marble-like ice, ranging from one thousand to two thousand feet in thickness, of which from one hundred to two hundred feet rises above, and from eight hundred to eighteen hundred feet sinks below, the level of the sea.” -Greely, General A. W. “Antarctica, or the Hypothetical Southern Continent.” Cosmopolitan 17 (1894): p. 296

      “It has been demonstrated that the earth is a plane, the surface-centre of which is immediately underneath the star called ‘Polaris,’ and the extremities of which are bounded by a vast region of ice and water and irregular masses of land. The whole terminates in fog and darkness, where snow and driving hail, piercing sleet and boisterous winds, howling storms, madly-mounting waves, and clashing icebergs are almost constant.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (117)

      Antarctica is not the tiny “ice-continent” found confined to the underside antipode of astronomer’s globes. Quite the contrary, Antarctica literally surrounds us 360 degrees, encircles every continent, and acts as a barrier holding in the oceans. The most commonly asked questions, and the greatest mysteries yet to be solved are: how far does the Antarctic ice extend outwards? Is there a limit? What lies beyond, or is it just snow and ice forever? Thanks to U.N. treaties and constant military surveillance, the North Pole and Antarctica remain cloaked in government secrecy, both purported “no-fly/no-sail” zones, with several reports of civilian pilots and captains being shooed away and escorted back under threat of violence.

      “How far the ice extends; how it terminates; and what exists beyond it, are questions to which no present human experience can reply. All we at present know is, that snow and hail, howling winds, and indescribable storms and hurricanes prevail; and that in every direction ‘human ingress is barred by unsealed escarpments of perpetual ice,’ extending farther than eye or telescope can penetrate, and becoming lost in gloom and darkness.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (91)

      Before reaching the Antarctic ice-wall, navigating the increasingly tumultuous Southern oceans, explorers encounter the longest, darkest, coldest nights and the most dangerous seas and storms anywhere on Earth. Vasco de Gama, an early 16th century Portuguese explorer of the South Seas wrote how, “The waves rise like mountains in height; ships are heaved up to the clouds, and apparently precipitated by circling whirlpools to the bed of the ocean. The winds are piercing cold, and so boisterous that the pilot’s voice can seldom be heard, whilst a dismal and almost continual darkness adds greatly to the danger.”

      In 1773 Captain Cook became the first modern explorer known to have breached the Antarctic Circle and reached the ice barrier. During three voyages, lasting three years and eight days, Captain Cook and crew sailed a total of 60,000 miles along the Antarctic coastline never once finding an inlet or path through or beyond the massive glacial wall! Captain Cook wrote: “The ice extended east and west far beyond the reach of our sight, while the southern half of the horizon was illuminated by rays of light which were reflected from the ice to a considerable height. It was indeed my opinion that this ice extends quite to the pole, or perhaps joins some land to which it has been fixed since creation.”

      On October 5th, 1839 another explorer, James Clark Ross began a series of Antarctic voyages lasting a total of 4 years and 5 months. Ross and his crew sailed two heavily armored warships thousands of miles, losing many men from hurricanes and icebergs, looking for an entry point beyond the southern glacial wall. Upon first confronting the massive barrier Captain Ross wrote of the wall, “extending from its eastern extreme point as far as the eye could discern to the eastward. It presented an extraordinary appearance, gradually increasing in height, as we got nearer to it, and proving at length to be a perpendicular cliff of ice, between one hundred and fifty feet and two hundred feet above the level of the sea, perfectly flat and level at the top, and without any fissures or promontories on its even seaward face. We might with equal chance of success try to sail through the cliffs of Dover, as to penetrate such a mass.”

      “Yes, but we can circumnavigate the South easily enough,’ is often said by those who don’t know, The British Ship Challenger recently completed the circuit of the Southern region – indirectly, to be sure – but she was three years about it, and traversed nearly 69,000 miles – a stretch long enough to have taken her six times round on the globular hypothesis.” -William Carpenter, “100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe” (78)

      “If we now consider the fact that when we travel by land or sea, and from any part of the known world, in a direction towards the North polar star, we shall arrive at one and the same point, we are forced to the conclusion that what has hitherto been called the North Polar region, is really the center of the Earth. That from this northern center the land diverges and stretches out, of necessity, towards a circumference, which must now be called the Southern region: which is a vast circle, and not a pole or center … In this and other ways all the great navigators have been frustrated in their efforts, and have been more or less confounded in their attempts to sail round the Earth upon or beyond the Antarctic circle. But if the southern region is a pole or center, like the north, there would be little difficulty in circumnavigating it, for the distance round would be comparatively small. When it is seen that the Earth is not a sphere, but a plane, having only one center, the north; and that the south is the vast icy boundary of the world, the difficulties experienced by circumnavigators can be easily understood.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Earth Not a Globe, 2nd Edition” (21-23)

      If the Earth were truly a globe, then every line of latitude South of the equator would have to measure a gradually smaller and smaller circumference the farther South traveled. In other words, the circumference at 10 degrees South latitude would comprise a smaller circle than at the equator, 20 degrees South latitude would comprise a circle smaller than 10, and so on. If, however, the Earth is an extended plane, then every line of latitude South of the equator should measure a gradually larger and larger circumference the farther South traveled. 10 degrees South latitude will comprise a larger circle than the equator, 20 degrees South latitude will comprise a circle larger than 10, and so on. Likewise, if the Earth were a globe, lines of longitude would bubble out at the equator while converging at both poles. Whereas if the Earth is an extended plane, lines of longitude should simply expand straight outwards from the North Pole. So which is actually the case?

      “Upon the principle, as taught by Scripture and common observation, that the world is not a Planet, but consists of vast masses of land stretched out upon level seas, the North being the centre of the system, it is evident that the degrees of longitude will gradually increase in width the whole way from the North centre to the icy boundary of the great Southern Circumference. In consequence of the difference between the actual extent of longitudes and that allowed for them by the Nautical Authorities, which difference, at the latitude of the Cape of Good Hope, has been estimated to amount to a great number of miles, many Ship-masters have lost their reckoning, and many vessels have been wrecked. Ship-captains, who have been educated in the globular theory, know not how to account for their getting so much out of their course in Southern latitudes, and generally put it down to currents; but this reason is futile, for although currents may exist, they do not usually run in opposite directions, and vessels are frequently wrecked, whether sailing East or West.” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (102)

      During Captain James Clark Ross’s voyages around the Antarctic circumference, he often wrote in his journal perplexed at how they routinely found themselves out of accordance with their charts, stating that they found themselves an average of 12-16 miles outside their reckoning every day, some days as much as 29 miles. Lieutenant Charles Wilkes commanded a United States Navy exploration expedition to the Antarctic from August 18th, 1838 to June 10th, 1842, almost four years spent “exploring and surveying the Southern ocean.” In his journals Lieutenant Wilkes also mentioned being consistently east of his reckoning, sometimes over 20 miles in less than 18 hours.

      “The commanders of these various expeditions were, of course, with their education and belief in the earth’s rotundity, unable to conceive of any other cause for the differences between log and chronometer results than the existence of currents. But one simple fact is entirely fatal to such an explanation, viz., that when the route taken is east or west the same results are experienced. The water of the southern region cannot be running in two opposite directions at the same time; and hence, although various local and variable currents have been noticed, they cannot be shown to be the cause of the discrepancies so generally observed in high southern latitudes between time and log results. The conclusion is one of necessity, forced upon us by the sum of the evidence collected that the degrees of longitude in any given southern latitude are larger than the degrees in any latitude nearer to the northern center; thus proving the already more than sufficiently demonstrated fact that the earth is a plane, having a northern center, in relation to which degrees of latitude are concentric, and from which degrees of longitude are diverging lines, continually increasing in their distance from each other as they are prolonged towards the great glacial southern circumference.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy: Earth Not a Globe!” (261)

      “February 11th, 1822, at noon, in latitude 65.53. S. our chronometers gave 44 miles more westing than the log in three days. On 22nd of April (1822), in latitude 54.16. S. our longitude by chronometers was 46.49, and by D.R. (dead reckoning) 47° 11´: On 2nd May (1822), at noon, in latitude 53.46. S., our longitude by chronometers was 59° 27´, and by D.R. 61° 6´. October 14th, in latitude 58.6, longitude by chronometers 62° 46´, by account 65° 24´. In latitude 59.7. S., longitude by chronometers was 63° 28´, by account 66° 42´. In latitude 61.49. S., longitude by chronometers was 61° 53´, by account 66° 38´.” -Captain James Weddell, “Voyages Towards the South Pole”

      “In the southern hemisphere, navigators to India have often fancied themselves east of the Cape when still west, and have been driven ashore on the African coast, which, according to their reckoning, lay behind them. This misfortune happened to a fine frigate, the Challenger, in 1845. How came Her Majesty’s Ship ‘Conqueror,’ to be lost? How have so many other noble vessels, perfectly sound, perfectly manned, perfectly navigated, been wrecked in calm weather, not only in dark night, or in a fog, but in broad daylight and sunshine – in the former case upon the coasts, in the latter, upon sunken rocks – from being ‘out of reckoning,’ under circumstances which until now, have baffled every satisfactory explanation.” -Rev. Thomas Milner, “Tour Through Creation”

      The equatorial circumference of the supposed ball-Earth is said to be 24,900 statute or 21,600 nautical miles. A nautical mile is the distance, following the supposed curvature of the Earth, from one minute of latitude to the next. A statue mile is the straight line distance between the two, not taking into account Earth’s alleged curvature.

      The “Australian Handbook, Almanack, Shippers’ and Importers’ Directory” states that the distance between Sydney and Nelson is 1400 nautical or 1633 statute miles. Allowing a more than sufficient 83 miles as the distance for rounding Cape Farewell and sailing up Tasman Bay to Nelson leaves 1550 statute miles as the straight-line distance from the meridian of Sydney to the meridian of Nelson. Their given difference in longitude is 22 degrees 2’14”. Therefore if 22 degrees 2’14” out of 360 is 1550 miles, the entirety measures 25,182 miles. This is larger than the Earth is said to be at the equator, and 4262 miles greater than it would be at Sydney’s southern latitude on a globe of said proportions! One 360th part of 25,182 gives 70 miles as the distance between each degree of longitude at Sydney’s 34 degree Southern latitude. On a globe 25,000 miles in equatorial circumference, however, degrees of longitude at 34 degrees latitude would be only 58 miles, a full 12 miles per degree less than reality. This perfectly explains why Ross and other navigators in the deep South experienced 12+ mile daily discrepancies between their reckoning and reality, the farther South traveled the farther the divide.

      “From near Cape Horn, Chile to Port Philip in Melbourne, Australia the distance is 9,000 miles. These two places are 143 degrees of longitude from each other. Therefore the whole extent of the Earth’s circumference is a mere arithmetical question. If 143 degrees make 9,000 miles, what will be the distance made by the whole 360 degrees into which the surface is divided? The answer is, 22,657 miles; or, 8357 miles more than the theory of rotundity would permit. It must be borne in mind, however, that the above distances are nautical measure, which, reduced to statute miles, gives the actual distance round the Southern region at a given latitude as 26,433 statute miles; or nearly 1,500 miles more than the largest circumference ever assigned to the Earth at the equator.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Earth Not a Globe, 2nd Edition” (52)

      Similar calculations made from the Cape of Good Hope, South Africa to Melbourne, Australia at an average latitude of 35.5 degrees South, have given an approximate figure of over 25,000 miles, which is again equal to or greater than the Earth’s supposed greatest circumference at the equator. Calculations from Sydney, Australia to Wellington, New Zealand at an average of 37.5 degrees South have given an approximate circumference of 25,500 miles, greater still! According to the ball-Earth theory, the circumference of the Earth at 37.5 degrees Southern latitude should be only 19,757 statute miles, almost six thousand miles less than such practical measurements.

      “The above calculations are, as already stated, only proximate; but as liberal allowances have been made for irregularities of route, etc., they are sufficiently accurate to prove that the degrees of longitude, as we proceed south-wards, do not diminish, as they would upon a globe, but expand or increase, as they must if the earth is a plane; or, in other words, the farthest point, or greatest latitude south, must have the greatest circumference and degrees of longitude.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy: Earth Not a Globe!” (258)

      “Parallels of latitude only – of all imaginary lines on the surface of the Earth – are circles, which increase, progressively, from the northern centre to the southern circumference. The mariner’s course in the direction of any one of these concentric circles is his longitude, the degrees of which INCREASE to such an extent beyond the equator (going southwards) that hundreds of vessels have been wrecked because of the false idea created by the untruthfulness of the charts and the globular theory together, causing the sailor to be continually getting out of his reckoning. With a map of the Earth in its true form all difficulty is done away with, and ships may be conducted anywhere with perfect safety. This, then, is a very important practical proof that the Earth is not a globe.” -William Carpenter, “100 Proofs the Earth is Not a Globe” (14)

      -Eric Dubay

      Here are a few more quotes pertaining to this subject:

      “Another thing is certain, that from within the equator the north pole star, and the constellations Ursa Major, Ursa Minor, and many others, can be seen from every meridian simultaneously; whereas in the south, from the equator, neither the so-called south pole star, nor the remarkable constellation of the Southern Cross, can be seen simultaneously from every meridian, showing that all the constellations of the south – pole star included – sweep over a great southern arc and across the meridian, from their rise in the evening to their setting in the morning. But if the earth is a globe, Sigma Octantis, a south pole star, and the Southern Cross, a southern circumpolar constellation, they would all be visible at the same time from every longitude on the same latitude, as is the case with the northern pole star and the northern circumpolar constellations. Such, however, is not the case.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (286)

      “It has often been urged that the earth must be a globe, because the stars in the southern ‘hemisphere’ move round a south polar star; in the same way that those of the north revolve round the northern pole star. This is another instance of the sacrifice of truth, and denial of the evidence of our senses for the purpose of supporting a theory which is in every sense false and unnatural. It is known to every observer that the north pole star is the centre of a number of constellations which move over the earth in a circular direction. Those nearest to it, as the ‘Great Bear,’ etc. are always visible in England during their whole twenty-four hours’ revolution. Those further away southwards rise north-north-east, and set south-south-west; still further south they rise east by north, and set west by north. The farthest south visible from England, the rising is more to the east and south-east, and the setting to the west and south-west. But all the stars visible from London rise and set in a way which is not compatible with the doctrine of rotundity. For instance, if we stand with our backs to the north, on the high land known as ‘Arthur’s Seat,’ near Edinburgh, and note the stars in the zenith of our position, and watch for several hours, the zenith stars will gradually recede to the north-west. If we do the same on Woodhouse Moor, near Leeds, or on any of the mountain tops in Yorkshire or Derbyshire, the same phenomenon is observed. The same thing may be seen from the top of Primrose Hill, near Regent’s Park, London; from Hampstead Heath; or Shooter’s Hill, near Woolwich. If we remain all night, we shall observe the same stars rising towards our position from the north-east, showing that the path of all the stars between ourselves and the northern centre move round the north pole-star as a common centre of rotation; just as they must do over a plane such as the earth is proved to be. It is undeniable that upon a globe zenith stars would rise, pass over head, and set in the plane of the observer’s position. If now we carefully watch in the same way the zenith stars from the Rock of Gibraltar, the very same phenomenon is observed. The same is also the case from Cape of Good Hope, Sydney and Melbourne in Australia, in New Zealand, in Rio Janeiro, Monte Video, Valparaiso, and other places in the south. If then the zenith stars of all the places on the earth, where special observations have been made, rise from the morning horizon to the zenith of an observer, and descend to the evening horizon, not in a plane of the position of such observer, but in an arc of a circle concentric with the northern centre, the earth is thereby proved to be a plane, and rotundity altogether disproved – shown, indeed, to be impossible.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (284-6)

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Rochelle May 14, 2016 at 5:27 pm Reply

    This is awesome. Thank you do much for taking the time to put this together. Myself and other skeptics of science greatly appreciate it.

    Like

  9. Smith June 20, 2016 at 6:19 am Reply

    So how come when the sun sets we gradually see it dip below the horizon and out of sight, if we live on a flat earth where the sun never drops below 3000 miles altitude?

    Like

    • John Ingrum August 20, 2016 at 3:41 pm Reply

      Perspective. That’s why it’s ludicrous to believe NASA saying stars are trillions of miles away. If true, we couldn’t see that far. They’re within the firmament, along with the sun & moon.

      Like

      • SG Today August 21, 2016 at 3:49 pm

        You say not trillions of miles. OK; what distance would you offer, and why is that the limit of sight?

        How would you explain the distance, visibility of constellations seasonally (and below equator), nightly movement of what we see overhead (during one night),

        Basically, can you explain (or provide a link) how all these things continually move in a variety of ways and are also easily visible to all who look up our entire life?

        BTW, NASA didn’t exist when the math was established and stellar distances were initially calculated, so you may need to find blame elsewhere.

        Like

  10. lwbut July 11, 2016 at 8:16 am Reply

    One fact ( undeniable even if never witnessed by you personally) that blows your entire belief system out of the water and down the toilet:

    There is NO room in any flat earth diagram i know of for the existence in the sky of the SOUTH pole around which ALL stars rotate down here. Show me a representation of earth and the sky that incorporates it and you might just çonvert me.
    (it’s a whole other world underneath your part of the spherical planet!)

    Like

  11. The Rationalizer August 2, 2016 at 8:19 pm Reply

    I created a video about the flat Earth model in the Quran – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FaNg_nxqns

    Like

  12. Curious August 18, 2016 at 6:13 pm Reply

    Just a quick question. What will we do if Space X (a private space company not controlled by NASA) will commercialize space flights and we go up in space and see the truth?

    Like

  13. Peter Ericsson September 19, 2016 at 12:16 pm Reply

    Great compilation! I am sure ‘the Spirit of truth’ will direct every true truth seeker………quite honestly, not every one is ‘worthy’ of such precious gems…..doubters and scoffers will find themselves left out…

    Like

  14. Josh September 30, 2016 at 4:44 am Reply

    Great work jwlpeace! This is just what I was looking for! Eventually people will get it, don’t get discouraged. This type of work is really important to the awakening process.

    I’m curious if you’ve found any imagery / artwork with the ‘portals’ described in the book of Enoch. Basically it reads that the sun and the moon enter and exit the firmament through ‘portals’ and has to do with the phases of the moon losing and gaining luminescence in increments of 7ths. There’s also another school of thought among FE that there are whirlpools near the center North Pole (Mt. Meru) that release and accept water causing the tides every six hours. Anything on those?
    Peace,
    Josh

    Like

    • jwlpeace September 30, 2016 at 6:40 am Reply

      Hey Josh,
      Thanx for the kind support, much appreciated.
      Yet check out my you tube channel at aplanetruth.info and watch the “Earth is a Battery” video. This explains the Anode (neg.charge) North Pole with the Diode (pos. charge) Arctic Circle with the electromagnetic plasma field of Earth inside our dome of particles charging in perpetual energy by the catalyst caused by the salt water in the ocean. Elegant, simple and proven by Tesla a hundred years previous.

      Like

  15. beLIEve February 18, 2017 at 12:28 am Reply

    NASA……..is “apparently” a Hebrew word meaning……..TO DECEIVE $$$!!

    http://robschannel.com/nasa-in-hebrew

    Like

  16. lwbut February 19, 2017 at 4:39 am Reply

    OR… you could try telling the TRUTH like good christians should! – http://www.hebrew4christians.com/Glossary/Word_of_the_Week/Archived/Nasa/nasa.html You chose your internet name well, beLIEve

    Like

  17. alwaysinvestigating March 11, 2017 at 5:03 pm Reply

    Great comments, Adam. It was nice to read someone saying something sensible at length. Wish more people would do their homework, instead of criticizing others who are seeking the truth.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: