It may be boldly asked where can the man be found, possessing the extraordinary gifts of Newton, who could suffer himself to be deluded by such a hocus-pocus, if he had not in the first instance willfully deceived himself;

Only those who know the strength of self-deception, and the extent to which it sometimes trenches on dishonesty, are in a condition to explain the conduct of Newton and of Newton’s school. To support his unnatural theory Newton heaps fiction upon fiction, seeking to dazzle where he cannot convince.

In whatever way or manner may have occurred this business, I must still say that I curse this modern history theory of Cosmology, and hope that perchance there may appear, in due time, some young scientists of genius, who will pick u courage enough to upset this universally disseminated delirium of lunatics.  ~ Goethe

Since the 17th century we have been told sold that we live on a round, then elliptical,
now pear shaped Earth, spinning around on its tilted axis at over 1,000 mph while
the Earth orbits the Sun, some 533 million miles each and every year.

This translates to incredible (as in unbelievable) speeds of 68,000 mph, or over 1,000 miles per second. Though we never feel a breath of evidence of movement or spinning, many stars remained “fixed” in the sky overhead while buildings, ocean and Man stay affixed to the rapidly
spinning ball due to an immense velcro force called “gravity” which in the etymology
of words, simply means “weight”.

Here science is put to the test by Brian Mullin who shows how it is impossible,
using basic scientific method, that we live on a round spinning ball Earth proving the ever more likelihood that we live on a flat, plane Earth and have been lied to for 500 years.

Please send this around to all science friends, teachers and professionals for repudiation or validation. Only through proving the fallacy of heliocentric scientific theory can geocentric flat earth theory be validated in our bassakwards ways of proving something right by what is not.

*****

A problem for discussion involving a plane flying relative to a rotating Earth. In the problem were are a “stationary” observer watching the plane fly on a spinning Earth, so this is why the rotation of Earth is relevant. The problem is that the plane ends up with a greater velocity to the east than that of the north-south orientated runway that it is trying to land on. There must be some unknown force that can balance out these differences in velocities for ALL planes that fly east or west during their flights. How do we calculate this force? Where does it come from? The only way to get rid of the need for the force is to stop the Earth from spinning. If we can’t calculate this, the Earth does not spin. We are able to calculate forces and velocities for all situations throughout Physics. There cannot be an exception for this. The problem also looks at the curvature the plane would have to fly over to get from one airport to the other. It appears that the plane would have to constantly “nose down” to follow the curvature

See also:

The Micheleson-Morey Flat Earth Experiments (1887)

Where is the Curvature?

Where is the Curvature? Part II

Is the Earth a Sphere? Cruisin’ at 30,000 ft.

Balls Out Physics Episode 2: The Gravitational Constant

In this episode we look at how the equation for gravity was developed and the experiment that was allegedly used to determine the Gravitational Constant, big G. It appears that the original experiment is very difficult to reproduce and that is very questionable since it was performed over 200 years ago.

See also:

Is Sir Isaac Newton’s “Law of Gravity” Just One Great Big 500 Yr. Old Lie?

Balls Out Physics Episode 3: Centripetal Force, Gravity, and the Sun

Continuing from Episode 2, this episode looks at the relationship between Centripetal Force and Gravity, and how the relationship was used to build the solar system model. When the equations are set equal to each other, the mass of the planet or object that is orbiting the Sun is cancelled it out. This is accepted by mainstream Physics, however this seems to defy the very logic that the equation of Gravity is based on since the force depends on both masses. It appears that this was by design to make the Solar System model work.

Conclusion:
The Solar System model was designed based on one Earth, orbiting one Sun, in one year. Therefore when the derived orbital radius equation from this model is used with a different period (time to complete orbit), what is calculated is the orbital radius that Earth (or an object with equal mass to Earth) would have for that period. If the mass of the object becomes larger or smaller than that of Earth, then the orbital radius, period, and velocity must all change because the force between the object and the Sun would have to change. Just because the math works out does not mean it is logical. The basic premise of the gravity equation is destroyed by cancelling the mass.

See Also:

How Did The Kings of Astronomy Get it So Wrong? Part I: Copernicus – Newton

How Did The Kings of Astronomy Get it So Wrong? Part II: Einstein and the Still Earth