There are NO commercial Flights from Santiago to Sydney.
There are NO commercial Shipping Routes from South America to Sydney/New Zealand.
There are NO commercial under-sea cables from South America to Sydney/New Zealand.
- Start Here
- First Questions Asked?
- Jesuits; Rulers of Evil
- History of Geocentric Theory
- The Heliocentric Globalist Theory
- Reasons to Doubt the Earth is Truly a Sphere
- Reasons to Doubt Everything NASA
- Moon Hoax Images
- Moon Hoax Videos
- Trusted FE Links
- Other Author Websites
- The F.E.S.S. Forum
- Flat Earth Videos
- Flat Earth Library
- Quotes
- Flat Earth Gallery I
- Flat Earth Gallery II
- FE Memes I
- FE Memes II
- FE Music Vids
- New! FE Maps
- Flat Earth Book Now On Sale!
Aplanetruth.info 
Hello my friend – wow! What a site! I watched one of your vids via YT and if I copy your YT name into Google Earth for a search, it comes up with your address! Don’t know how to prevent this but you are down the road from me [Camberley]. Be good to meet up sometime. Already long into most of this but flat earth is a new one – but why should I be surprised??
Contact me via the email addy. Well done on the vids, btw.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As of sept. 2015, there are non stop flights from Sydney to santiago. A traveler by the NE of Josh Cahill did a review of his flight on Quantas qf63 and gave details of his flight with a picture of the flight over antarctica. He said that this is now one of regular non stop flights on this route. Another video l saw showed John Travolta greeting passengers from the first flight. Apparently the reason this route is new is because of past airline logistics problems being now ironed out. I Have been intently studying flat earth theory and am fairly convinced of the curvature experiments
This evidence seems to contradict those proposals.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that flight showed nil evidence of actual completion as described. no evidence as would be put forward attempting to disprove the flight, just shots of wine glasses and out thw window, no time references no compass shots which do work at those altitudes, it was a non event in terms of evidence
LikeLike
No sure it contradicts anything it just means it needs to be researched. Nothing is disproven till its indendently looked at. The flight needs to be booked and not just once but several times and the journey actually undertaken,
then an audit done on its flight path actual, and times, plus fuel used. Debate is fine but real research does take time.
LikeLike
Later in 2015, there are now nonstop flights from Santiago to sydney. A big deal was made about it. Check Qantas now and you will see it scheduled. A traveler named Josh did a YouTube video describing the flight including a photo of outside the window showing antatctica. Apparently, this flight did not exist earlier because it wasn’t profitable for airline. Interesting that was established after flat earth’s questioned if you could fly this route and what the distance and flight times were.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry. I just realized I’ve already posted this info.
LikeLike
This flight still doesn’t fly directly over south pole which theoretically would be shortest path.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perth in Western Australia to Johannesburg in South Africa by direct flight with no fuel stops. I and many of my family have made that trip, and back. Some multiple times. It doesn’t take that long, certainly less than half a day and nothing like the lonnngggg boring 24 hour trek to London which seems about the same distance on the FE map.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m guessing you’re American, yes? I love Americans but some of them have a curious kind of myopia: nothing really exists outside the shores of the United States, and if someone says it does, it’s OK to ignore it.
Trouble is, friend, Qantas flight 27 (Sydney-Santiago non stop) and flight 28 (Santiago-Sydney non stop) DO exist. I’ve taken them, so have my wife and daughter, so have hundreds of thousands of other people, maybe more. It takes about 12 hours. The flights go 3 times a week. I’ve taken it. Get that? I’ve taken it. And before that, Qantas used to fly direct to Buenos Aires.
So what’s your answer to this? That I’m part of a global conspiracy? Do you really suggest that these flights don’t exist, that countless people haven’t taken them? I don’t think you believe that.
Why don’t you book it, come down to Australia, enjoy yourself in our beautiful country, and then and take the flight to Santiago and back? And having done that, you can grow up.
LikeLike
Careful John! Keep in mind that another characteristic of Americans is their bombing of anyone they don’t like. They also generally distrust anyone who is a non-American, and they’re willing to erase history when they don’t like it. In fact, this very comment will be removed by an American very shortly.
LikeLike
ok john whos flown the sydney santiago route, pls photocopy yr ticket and post it online, that will do as a starter.
LikeLike
jeranism interviewed with video tape of the flight it’s a real flight according to jeranism, he was trying to argue it flew over los Angeles though lmao, doesn’t matter the path though it’s the 13 hour flight time regardless of the route that debunks the FE model completely, Quantas also flies non stop to Johannesburg which also debunks the FE model
LikeLike
To this day there are no commercial flights in the Southern Hemisphere flying over Antarctica which would be the shortest distance from South America to Australia on the globe model. All flights use the Northern route to cross anywhere on Earth. My wife travels to China twice a year from Los Angeles to Shanghai always flying over Alaska and the North Pole.
LikeLike
Philippe,
Instead of a continent to continent flight (too vague a premise to test), I chose Santiago Chile to Sydney NSW to examine your claim.
Using a physical globe as well as google earth shows a straight line flight will miss Antarctica entirely; never even crossing the antarctic circle. So the evidence shows your claim of “crossing Antarctica” to be false.
Thx.
LikeLike
Flights from Sidney to Santiago do not fly in the Southern Hemisphere edging Antarctica, all flights use the Northern hemisphere route flying in a straight line on a flat plane. So your response is false.
LikeLike
Philippe,
You claimed: “there are no commercial flights in the Southern Hemisphere flying over Antarctica which would be the shortest distance from South America to Australia on the globe model”. Hence, you claim the shortest distance between these places on a globe earth is over Antarctica.
The evidence from a globe model, as I noted, for flights between 2 specific cities on those continents, does not cross Antarctica. That is how and why your globe claim is false.
BTW, your original comment preceding mine never mentioned a thing about a flat earth model, therefore I never used that in my evidence, proving you were incorrect about a globe earth.
Thx.
LikeLike
Also the term circumnavigation is used to mean navigating the great circle. Princess Cruises averaging 30 MPH takes several months to navigate from Melbourne to South America when it should only take few weeks on the globe model to cover 6000 miles edging Antarctica. Clearly Princess Cruises navigates close to the Antarctica wall the largest circumference on the flat earth model.
LikeLike
Philippe,
To close out the prior exchange; do you accept my evidence? How do you think this might affect your other claims made in relation to the erroneous claim?
As for your cruise claim; is there any evidence of this cruise being offered with the elapsed time as you claim?
Thx.
LikeLike
A simple search phrase as “Princess Cruises circumnavigate from Australia to South America” should do it. That’s how I found out. You need to do some foot work yourself to retain the information better.
LikeLike
Philippe,
Anyone using google knows there is no such thing as a “simple search”. 🙂
To prove this, I used your exact suggestion, with the following results:
——————————— ———————————
About 27,400 results (1.07 seconds)
No results found for “Princess Cruises circumnavigate from Australia to South America”.
Results for Princess Cruises circumnavigate from Australia to South America (without quotes):
——————————— ———————————
Clearly, tens of thousands results is anything but simple; and I have better things to do than spend my time providing evidence for your claim. If you don’t have anything to offer, you can just tell it like it is.
I’m fine doing my own footwork, but that should go for you as well. I’d be happy to wait for your findings.
Thx.
LikeLike
I would hate to hire you as a researcher. It was a walk in the park with dozen hits.
Melbourne Australia to Cape Horn South America is around 6000 miles via Southern Hemisphere and edging Antarctica. Average speed of a cruise ship is about 30 MPH. Do the math, 24 hours would cover around 720 miles. In other words it shouldn’t take more then 10 days to reach the destination, but instead it takes months according to Princess Cruises.
All it takes is some critical thinking with some simple math to debunk their bullshit sphere hoax.
Princess Cruises has revealed plans for the first ever circumnavigation of South America roundtrip from Australia, visiting 28 ports in 18 countries, with overnight stays in Buenos Aires, Lima and Rio in time for Carnivale.
Passengers can choose to board Sea Princess’ 84-night Circle South America cruise in Sydney, Brisbane or Auckland, departing January 2017.
“This is the first time it’s ever been done from Australia,” said Stuart Allison, Princess Cruises vice president Australia and New Zealand, whose team has spent five years working on the epic itinerary.
Also featured in the line’s 2016-17 program is a 48-night voyage from England to Australia, departing Southampton via Europe, the Middle East and Asia. The Four Continents Grand Adventure will be aboard Emerald Princess, which will then be based in Sydney for its first season down under.
On sale from 23 April 2015, Princess’ new program has five ships providing record capacity to passengers from Sydney, Melbourne, Perth, Brisbane and Auckland, with a focus on longer trips to Asia, Hawaii, Tahiti, Papua New Guinea, New Zealand and around Australia.
–By Louise Goldsbury, Australia Editor
The term circumnavigation was also referred as the Great Circle which on the globe model would be the equator which obviously you cannot navigate all the around without running into land but instead throughout history and even today circumnavigation is in reference to traveling the Southern Hemisphere edging Antarctica where on the Flat Earth is the largest circle or circumference of water. This is the same reason why Princess Cruises uses the term circumnavigate from Australia to South America and takes several months to get to their destinations. Therefore the term circumnavigate cannot be used to travel the Southern Hemisphere on a globe model since it’s the shortest distance in circumference.
LikeLike
Philippe,
Well, since you presumably had already searched for this topic, you would have a better chance to quickly re-find your past sources. Too bad you didn’t post any links as evidence so we could all get the exact set of cruise details, rather than having to read your synopsis second-hand. Any chance you’ll help us out?
BTW- being hired to do research provides incentive (pay) to perform a search.Helping someone else prove their point is a fool’s errand.
Thx.
LikeLike
https://www.cruisecritic.com/news/news.cfm?ID=6297
LikeLike
You cannot use the term circumnavigation on the globe model as the term is used in reference to the great circle of the flat plane.
LikeLike
The flat earth theory is not new, old civilisation, religions and some scientists agree on the flatness of the earth. To disagree with millions of people and follow one mad person and one sick organisation does not make sense at all
LikeLike