You’re dumb if you get hyped up about any of this shit. The moon landing photos, that’s one thing but who’s to say it wasn’t negatively doctored to portray the “fake” effect? And as far as pictures of earth an everyone shouting, “it’s all fake!!!” who fucking cares? It’s literally the best we can do. There are satellites orbiting our planet with cameras on them (it’s true, believe it or not) but these satellites don’t orbit Earth from far enough to capture the entire globe so individual images must be doctored together to create a full image of Earth. It’s an assembled picture but, it’s not fake in the same sense that any panorama photo is not fake as well. Considering the average cost of a satellite launch is $200 million and satellites themselves can cost billions, this will have to do until you get off your lazy ass, become a billionaire, and launch your own satellite into unprecedentedly far Earth orbit. Idiots.
Seth, name calling doesn’t help your cause. I fact, it makes you seem close minded and unwilling to even entertain the concept. Leaving an insulting comment here sound more egotistical than educational.
Yes, aerial photos are stitched to build a view of the Earth, but it doesn’t prove shape or size, just area. What everyone is asking for is a raw view of the planet.
Not so smart now, are you
November 16, 2016 at 3:25 am Reply
The one with “sloppy mirrored edges” is simply due to the fact that earth isn’t a perfect sphere. And the one with a square around earth; suggesting it was cropped into the picture, as a photographer myself I will tell you that is just a shadow box. At the time of this picture, photographers would place a shadow sheet around the object they want to make more define. Educate yourself, the rest are
So stupid it’s not worth arguing.
You’re dumb if you get hyped up about any of this shit. The moon landing photos, that’s one thing but who’s to say it wasn’t negatively doctored to portray the “fake” effect? And as far as pictures of earth an everyone shouting, “it’s all fake!!!” who fucking cares? It’s literally the best we can do. There are satellites orbiting our planet with cameras on them (it’s true, believe it or not) but these satellites don’t orbit Earth from far enough to capture the entire globe so individual images must be doctored together to create a full image of Earth. It’s an assembled picture but, it’s not fake in the same sense that any panorama photo is not fake as well. Considering the average cost of a satellite launch is $200 million and satellites themselves can cost billions, this will have to do until you get off your lazy ass, become a billionaire, and launch your own satellite into unprecedentedly far Earth orbit. Idiots.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seth, name calling doesn’t help your cause. I fact, it makes you seem close minded and unwilling to even entertain the concept. Leaving an insulting comment here sound more egotistical than educational.
Yes, aerial photos are stitched to build a view of the Earth, but it doesn’t prove shape or size, just area. What everyone is asking for is a raw view of the planet.
LikeLike
The one with “sloppy mirrored edges” is simply due to the fact that earth isn’t a perfect sphere. And the one with a square around earth; suggesting it was cropped into the picture, as a photographer myself I will tell you that is just a shadow box. At the time of this picture, photographers would place a shadow sheet around the object they want to make more define. Educate yourself, the rest are
So stupid it’s not worth arguing.
LikeLike
If the moon landing is fake, why can’t the satellites be fake, and we just bounce waves across the barriers instead?
Also earth not being a perfect sphere has nothing to due with that, c’mon now.
LikeLike