The Hubble Telescope Hoax


Since 1991, Hubble Telescope orbiting Earth 350 miles in space, traveling at 17,000 mph, photographing far, far distant ancient light and faint radio waves from planets, stars and galaxies up to hundreds of trillions of miles away. This the NASA/Official story.


Every single story and picture from space has always come from one source since space flight was began: NASA.

NASA was founded in 1958 when SS Nazi Werhner Von Braun was selected to head the Saturn rocket program for all space flights. Previous to his running NASA’s rocket program, he headed the V-2 (Vengeance of Destruction) rocket program for Hitler during WWII.

Von Braun, as well as his chief rocket engineer, Arthur Rudolph used concentration camp slave labor to build their rockets that rained down on Europe killing tens of thousands of U.S. allies.

Faced with shortages of labor, Arthur Rudolph, the chief V–2 production engineer, in a memo of April 12, 1943, recommended that the missile program at Peenemünde adopt the exploitation of SS camp labor like that he saw at an aircraft factory.

Despite the complicity of some engineers, the United States did not include the engineers in the 1947 Nordhausen trial or any other war crimes trials. As later US citizens, von Braun and Rudolph later earned awards for work on the Saturn V launch vehicle that took men to the moon.

This sets the background for the launch of the Hubble Deep Space Telescope on April 24, 1990 and after fixing an alleged flawed mirror, has said by NASA to have  “discovered” billions of planets, stars and galaxies.

Hubble’s discoveries have transformed the way scientists look at the universe. Its ability to show the universe in unprecedented detail has turned astronomical conjectures into concrete certainties. It has winnowed down the collection of theories about the universe even as it sparked new ones, clarifying the path for future astronomers.

Among its many discoveries, Hubble has revealed the age of the universe to be about 13 to 14 billion years, much more accurate than the old range of anywhere from 10 to 20 billion years. Hubble played a key role in the discovery of dark energy, a mysterious force that causes the expansion of the universe to accelerate.

Hubble has shown scientists galaxies in all stages of evolution, including toddler galaxies that were around when the universe was still young, helping them understand how galaxies form. It found protoplanetary disks, clumps of gas and dust around young stars that likely function as birthing grounds for new planets. It discovered that gamma-ray bursts — strange, incredibly powerful explosions of energy — occur in far-distant galaxies when massive stars collapse. And these are only a handful of its many contributions to astronomy.

The sheer amount of astronomy based on Hubble observations has also helped make it one of history’s most important observatories. More than 10,000 scientific articles have been published based on Hubble data.

The policies that govern the telescope have contributed to its incredible productivity. The telescope is an instrument for the entire astronomical community — any astronomer in the world can submit a proposal and request time on the telescope. Teams of experts then select the observations to be performed. Once observations are completed, the astronomers have a year to pursue their work before the data is released to the entire scientific community. Because everyone gets to see the information, the observations have given rise to a multitude of findings — many in areas that would not have been predicted by the telescope’s original proposals. Hubble’s success with these policies has helped spread them throughout the astronomical community, and they are becoming common with other observatories.

Problem with this all, is that it is impossible to achieve the results that NASA claims to achieve because of the simple problem of trying to photograph and record, with extremely sensitive recording equipment,  stars, planets and galaxies trillions of miles away giving off the faintest of radiation to accurately determine the size, shape, heat/cold, orbit and make up of these stars, planets and galaxies  while the Hubble Telescope trucks around Earth’s orbit at 5 miles/second or 17,000 miles per hour!

Every 97 minutes, Hubble completes a spin around Earth, moving at the speed of about five miles per second (8 km per second) — fast enough to travel across the United States in about 10 minutes. As it travels, Hubble’s mirror captures light and directs it into its several science instruments.

Additionally, there is the atmospheric refraction problem and an error factor of some 2500 miles to deal with:

Hubble orbits in the upper atmosphere at an altitude of approximately 569 kilometres (354 mi) and an inclination of 28.5°. The position along its orbit changes over time in a way that is not accurately predictable. The density of the upper atmosphere varies according to many factors, and this means that Hubble’s predicted position for six weeks’ time could be in error by up to 4,000 km (2,500 mi).

At this altitude of orbit of 354 miles or 569 kilometers, the temperature reaches over 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit !  What kind of man made machine can even operate at these temperatures that melt even the hardest of metals???

The thermosphere is a region of very high temperature that extends from the top of the mesosphere at around 85 kilometers up to 640 kilometers above the Earth’s surface. It is called the thermosphere because temperatures spike to thermal levels

Temperatures are highly dependent on solar activity, and can rise to 2,000 °C (3,630 °F). Radiation causes the atmosphere particles in this layer to become electrically charged (see ionosphere), enabling radio waves to bounce off and be received beyond the horizon. In the exosphere, beginning at 500 to 1,000 kilometres (310 to 620 mi) above the Earth’s surface, the atmosphere turns into space.

The highly diluted gas in this layer can reach 2,500 °C (4,530 °F) during the day..  (Source)


Astronauts Musgrave and Hoffman install corrective optics during SM1. Careful guys it’s 4,000 degrees + out there! 

“Hey, anyone seen any stars??? …oh wait here they are!, whew got scared for a moment.”


So let’s assume that NASA figured out a way to precisely record faint radiation and light emitted from trillions of miles away while operating in 4,000F + temperatures while orbiting around the Earth at 17,000 mph, what kind of super sensitive instruments are they claiming to use here to record all the incredible (as in unbelievable!) images that tell us of a massive universe?

Hubble is a type of telescope known as a Cassegrain reflector. Light hits the telescope’s main mirror, or primary mirror. It bounces off the primary mirror and encounters a secondary mirror. The secondary mirror focuses the light through a hole in the center of the primary mirror that leads to the telescope’s science instruments.

Hubble’s primary mirror is 94.5 inches (2.4 m) in diameter. This mirror is small compared with those of current ground-based telescopes, which can be 400 inches (1,000 cm) and up, but Hubble’s location beyond the atmosphere gives it remarkable clarity.

Once the mirror captures the light, Hubble’s science instruments work together or individually to provide the observation. Each instrument is designed to examine the universe in a different way.

The Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3) sees three different kinds of light: near-ultraviolet, visible and near-infrared, though not simultaneously. Its resolution and field of view are much greater than that of Hubble’s other instruments. WFC3 is one of Hubble’s two newest instruments, and will be used to study dark energy and dark matter, the formation of individual stars and the discovery of extremely remote galaxies previously beyond Hubble’s vision.

The Cosmic Origins Spectrograph (COS), Hubble’s other new instrument, is a spectrograph that sees exclusively in ultraviolet light. Spectrographs acts something like prisms, separating light from the cosmos into its component colors. This provides a wavelength “fingerprint” of the object being observed, which tells us about its temperature, chemical composition, density, and motion. COS will improve Hubble’s ultraviolet sensitivity at least 10 times, and up to 70 times when observing extremely faint objects.

The Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) sees visible light, and is designed to study some of the earliest activity in the universe. ACS helps map the distribution of dark matter, detects the most distant objects in the universe, searches for massive planets, and studies the evolution of clusters of galaxies. ACS partially stopped working in 2007 due to an electrical short, but was repaired during Servicing Mission 4 in May 2009.

The Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph (STIS) is a spectrograph that sees ultraviolet, visible and near-infrared light, and is known for its ability to hunt black holes. While COS works best with small sources of light, such as stars or quasars, STIS can map out larger objects like galaxies. STIS stopped working due to a technical failure on August 3, 2004, but was also repaired during Servicing Mission 4.

The Near Infrared Camera and Multi-Object Spectrometer (NICMOS) is Hubble’s heat sensor. Its sensitivity to infrared light — perceived by humans as heat — lets it observe objects hidden by interstellar dust, like stellar birth sites, and gaze into deepest space.

Finally, the Fine Guidance Sensors (FGS) are devices that lock onto “guide stars” and keep Hubble pointed in the right direction. They can be used to precisely measure the distance between stars, and their relative motions.

Additionally, to give you an idea how implausibly they can accurately determine size, shape, heat/cold, orbital speed and make up of planet, stars and galaxies see how the best of ground observatories do it;

The Porto team used a different method to study a familiar exoplanet, 51 Pegasi b, which 20 years ago was the first exoplanet found orbiting a normal star. Researchers employed an instrument called the High Accuracy Radial velocity Planet Searcher (HARPS) attached to a 3.6-meter telescope operated by the European Southern Observatory (ESO) at La Silla in Chile. HARPS is one of astronomy’s most successful planet hunters; it works by scrutinizing stars for wobbles caused by the tug of an orbiting exoplanet’s gravity. That is how 51 Pegasi b—known as a “hot Jupiter” because of its size and closeness to its star—and hundreds of other exoplanets have been found.

To spot the wobble, researchers using instruments like HARPS build up a reference spectrum for the star—how brightly it shines at each wavelength—as if it is at rest. Using that reference, they then look to see if the observed spectrum shifts over time. If the observed spectrum shifts a bit toward the red end, it means the star is moving away—stretching out its light to longer wavelengths. A shift to the blue end means the star is moving closer—bunching up its light to shorter wavelengths. Repeated observations reveal the size and period of the wobble, and from that astronomers can infer some characteristics of the planet that is causing it—without actually “seeing” the planet itself.


All the while the universe is said to be moving outward from the Big Bang at the speed of light! Right!

Image: Hubble’s eXtreme deep field image. Credit: (Credit: NASA; ESA; G. Illingworth, D. Magee, and P. Oesch, University of California, Santa Cruz; R. Bouwens, Leiden University; and the HUDF09 Team).

We are told sold that the incredible ultra sensitive recording devices of the Hubble Telescope has even discovered galaxies so far away that Man can not even comprehend such distance.

The latest image assembled by images captured by Hubble is the eXtreme Deep Field (XDF). This has allowed astronomers to discover the most distant object UDFj-39546284, an early forming galaxy at over 13.2 billion light years away when the Universe was still developing into the form we see today. (Source)

To calculate just how far away they are claiming, let’s do the math.

A light-year is the distance light travels in one year, around 9461 billion kilometres, 5879 billion miles.

5879 billion miles X 13.2 Billion = 77,603,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 miles away!!!

So let’s say that the good Nazi’s at NASA, or NAZI, have been able to make these incredibly powerful instruments work.

What about all the space debris, cosmic dust, meterorite and micrometeorite debris, solar flares, asteroid and comet trails of ionic dust plus not so small impediments to view so far through the asteroid belt?

Wouldn’t all this affect such a super sensitive measurement device measuring 77 billion trillion miles away?  Hmmm.

This is an official NASA “photograph” of Hubble being deployed from Discovery in 1990.

First of all, camera shooting directly into the Sun, in space vacuum shining directly into the camera? Would not the camera have to stop all the way down and render anything in the foreground dark? Second, it looks nothing like a photograph but a painting, a very poor one at that.

So how do they fake it.  EZ PZ. Just sell the lie, keep the money and get a very large pool to film the Great Space Hoax.

Camera Crew: Taking Pictures of the Mission (1997)

“Houston we have a problem, we don’t seem to see any stars while we are in a space vacuum so our thrusters are useless, but somehow we are able to work for hours in deep space untethered  to the spacecraft to do repairs on the Hubble while she travels around the Earth at 17,000 mph, while we work in 4,000 F+ temp’s outside. No problemo”

About This Official NASA Image

Astronaut Steven Smith took this picture of fellow crew member Mark Lee during Hubble’s second servicing mission in 1997. Lee is preparing to document the day’s activities with a shuttle camera. Engineers rely on astronauts’ photos to design and build new hardware for Hubble, and other astronauts use them for training. In addition to the hand-held cameras, the shuttle has cameras mounted to it in various locations to capture other footage.


How and Where They Fake It

The Neutral Buoyancy Laboratory (NBL) is an astronaut training facility operated by NASA and located at the Sonny Carter Training Facility, near the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas.[2] The NBL consists of a large indoor pool of water,[3] in which astronauts may perform simulated EVA tasks in preparation for upcoming missions. Trainees wear suits designed to provide neutral buoyancy to simulate the microgravity that astronauts would experience during spaceflight.

The diving tank is 202 feet (62 m) in length, 102 feet (31 m) wide, and 40 feet 6 inches (12.34 m) deep, and contains 6.2 million gallons (23.5 million litres) of water.[4][5] The NBL contains full-scale mock-ups of International Space Station (ISS) modules and payloads, as well as visiting vehicles such as the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) HTV, the European Space Agency ATV, the SpaceX Dragon, and the Orbital Sciences Corporation Cygnus.[4] Previously there was also a mockup of the Space Shuttle payload bay, but since Space Shuttle retirement it has been removed.

(and all convenient for photographing and filming fake space walks and missions. all they need to do is film against a green screen or blacked out pool wall)

First, you must learn how to put on your 127-kilogram (280-pound) spacesuit — it will provide you with the air you need to breathe while you’re outside your spacecraft. It will also keep your body at a comfortable temperature even though it may be 200 degrees below zero to 200 degrees above zero outside. (NASA source)

(At 130 miles in space, science claims there is still 90% gravity from Earth, or microgravity, which means the space suits, inside the space shuttle still weigh some 252 pounds! Also, note that NASA says the temperatures are only 200F degrees + or – in space)

“The thin atmosphere offers little thermal insulation, so temperatures can drop quickly at night, and rise quickly due to the sun’s radiation during the day.” ..with temps varying from – 225 to + 243 every single day and night”..”The thin atmosphere offers little thermal insulation, so temperatures can drop quickly at night, and rise quickly due to the sun’s radiation during the day. Powerful radiation from sunlight on one side of an object, and shadow on the other will create a large temperature gradient. A “thermal shock” can follow, where different parts of an object thermally expand by different amounts, leading to large potentially failure-inducing strains. The effect of thermal shock is more pronounced in brittle materials such as glass, ceramics or metals below the glass transition temperature (ductile-brittle transition temperature for metals)”.(The Lunar Sourcebook (Heiken, Vaniman, & French, 1991

Dave, why haven’t we vaporized into white hot piles of meteoric ash?
Because we are in a swimming pool, Ivan. Ah, for a minute there I almost forgot.  (source)


Tricks of the Trickery: “space bubbles”


Panties in a Bunch. Climbing Harness’ and Support Wires creating “weightlessness”

Ask yourself what in near weightless space would cause such “crotch wrinkle”??

this would!

NASA hoax ISS Actornaut Chris Cassidy accidentaly admits they are filming in the USA BUSTED

(make sure to look at the chest areas to see the outlines of the climbing rig harness’)



Or more precisely, by THIS lone WONDERBOLT

Quite honestly, this particular – uh – engineering solution to keep the shuttle from detaching itself from the tank during its 10.000+ mph ascent, offensively defies whatever humble notions of mechanics/aerodynamics I may have (correctly or incorrectly) assimilated in the course of my lifetime. The pull forces exerted on that single, lone bolt must be phenomenal; to make matters worse, not only do we have one single bolt ‘securing’ the front end of the Shuttle – as well as the lives of these astronaughts and the success of all these shuttle launches, it is also a moving part ! (a fact which, notoriously, makes it even more vulnerable to disfunction/breakage – titanium or not titanium



When comparing it to the ‘red shot’ (admittedly a higher resolution still), it simply doesn’t make sense for that rod on the near side to be pretty much invisible – especially since the other rod on the far side is quite visible. . The rods in the ‘red’ shot are considerably lighter than their background (the darker tank) so there is no reason why one of them should virtually disappear in the ‘green shot’ only because of some lower resolution issue. There would appear to be a cut (see white arrow) – not that I know why this was made, but I would say the most likely answer to this little mystery is ‘sloppy photoshopping’.

Source reference for the Endeavour shot:
NASA official website … index.html

Source reference for the Atlantis shot:
“Nasa shuttle launch Atlantis high definition 1280×720”

ONLY the pipe ring is moving here – NOTHING else. And no – no changes in focal length/zoom settings of the ‘camera lens’ are observed:

(Tip: just put your cursor over any given area of the picture. Check it out. Note: The two frames are of course, taken from the same shuttle launch video.)

61 thoughts on “The Hubble Telescope Hoax

  1. snchs June 26, 2015 at 6:31 am Reply

    NASA is a private corp owned by Jews….not Nazi’s. Nazi’s didn’t do 911, the Jews did. Nazi’s didn’t gun grab, they lowered the age…….they just didn’t allow illegals to own them. WINSTON CHURCHILL SAID THIS ON FEB 8 1920 IN NEWSPAPER IN LONDON: “In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort rise the schemes of the International Jews. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing…and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.
    There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews.”
    “Atrocity Propaganda is how we (Brits) won the war!” “We won this war with atrocity propaganda…and now we will start more than ever! We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will increase it until nobody will accept one good word from the Germans anymore, until everything is destroyed which might have upheld them sympathies in other countries, and until they will be so confused that they don’t know what to do anymore. When this is reached, when they begin to pollute their own nest, and this not reluctantly but with hasty willingness to obey the winners, only then the victory is complete. It will never be definite. The reeducation demands thorough, steadfast nurture like English lawn. Only one moment of inattention and the weed will break through, this ineradicable weed of historic truth.” – Sefton Delmer (JEWISH), former British chief propagandist, commenting after the capitulation in 1945 to the German expert on international law Prof. Grimm.

    “Do not let yourself be disconcerted by the worldwide clamor that will now begin, There will come a day, when all the lies will collapse under their own weight, and truth will again triumph.” Dr. Joseph Goebbels, Berlin, May 1st, 1945.
    The MARXISTS slaughtered 66 million Russian Christians behind their iron curtain and the media hid it. This was by the “homeland” security of theirs….called, the CHEKA. Look it up. The Talmud calls all non YIDS ANIMALs. In Yiddish language……do you know what CHEKA means???????!!!!!!!! ANIMAL SLAUGHTER!!!!!!!! The CHEKA changed names to NKVD, the KGB. NOW DO YOU GET IT?
    “Hitler will have no war (does not want wr), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon.”- Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934 (also quoted in his book “The New Holy Alliance”).
    “We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany.” – David A. Brown, National Chairman, United Jewish Campaign, 1934
    We have exterminated the property owners in Russia.We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America. (The Jew, December 1925,Zinobit)
    The world revolution which we will experience will be exclusively our affair and will rest in our hands. This revolution will tighten the Jewish domination over all other people.” – Le Peuple Juif, February 8, 1919
    “Israel won the war [WW I]; we made it; we thrived on it; we profited from it. It was our supreme revenge on Christianity.” (The Jewish Ambassador from Austria to London, Count Mensdorf, 1918).
    “We corrupt in order to rule.”— Italian Jew Freemason Giuseppe Mazzini who was also like his assoc. Albert Pike, real name Albert Chase…Jew who also created the KKK.
    As Napolean said of the jews “They have a creed that blesses their misdeeds and thievings”
    “The United Nations is nothing but a trap-door to the Red World’s immense concentration camp. We pretty much control the U.N.” Harold Wallace Rosenthal (Jew)
    “Masonry is based on Judaism. Eliminate the teachings of Judaism from the Masonic Ritual and what is left?” – “Jewish Tribune of New York”, October 28, 1927
    “Freemasonry is a Jewish establishment, whose history; grades; official appointments; passwords; and explanations, are Jewish from beginning to end.” – Rabbi Isaac Wise – 1927
    “The Jewish people as a whole will be its own messiah. It will attain world dominion by the dissolution of other races, by the abolition of frontiers, the annihilation of monarchy, and by the establishment of a world republic in which the Jews will everywhere exercise the privilege of citizenship. In this “New World Order,” the children of Israel will furnish all the leaders without encountering opposition. The Governments of the different peoples forming the world republic will fall without difficulty into the hands of the Jews. It will then be possible for the Jewish rulers to abolish private property, and everywhere to make use of the resources of the state. Thus will the promise of the Talmud be fulfilled, in which is said that when the Messianic time is come, the Jews will have all the property of the whole world in their hands.” – Baruch Levy, in a letter to Karl Marx, published in “La Revue de Paris,” pg. 572 – June 1, 1928
    “Hitler will have no war (does not want war), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon.” – Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934 (also quoted in his book “The New Holy Alliance”).
    “We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany.” – David A. Brown, National Chairman, United Jewish Campaign, 1934 (quoted in “I Testify Against The Jews” by Robert Edward Edmondson, page 188 and “The Jewish War of Survival” by Arnold Leese, page 52).
    “We want to bring about a deep hatred for the Germans, for German soldiers, sailors, and airmen. We must hate until we win.” – Lord Beaverbrook, quoted in Niemals! by Heinrich Goitsch.
    “There is only one power which really counts. The power of political pressure. We Jews are the most powerful people on earth, because we have this power, and we know how to apply it.” – Vladimir Jabotinsky, Jewish Daily Bulletin, July 27, 1935.
    “Before the end of the year, an economic bloc of England, Russia, France and the U.S.A will be formed to bring the German and Italian economic systems to their knees.” – Paul Dreyfus, “La Vie de Tanger” May 15, 1938.
    On the 3rd of June, 1938, the American Hebrew boasted that they had Jews in the foremost positions of influence in Britain, Russia and France, and that these “three sons of Israel will be sending the Nazi dictator to hell.” – Joseph Trimble, the American Hebrew.
    “Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war without mercy against her. One may be sure of this: We will lead that war!” – Bernard Lecache, the president of the “International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism,” in its newspaper “Droit de Vivre” (Right to Life), 9 November, 1938.
    “The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world.” – Brigadier General George Van Horn Mosely, The New York Tribune, March 29, 1939.
    “Hitler killed six million Jews who never existed in gas chambers which nobody ever saw.” — Jewish scholar Roger Dommergue


    • Reinhardt March 30, 2016 at 6:19 pm Reply

      Assuming the word has already been manipulated to be influenced completely by a group of Jewish peoples. In such a way that they can create just the right amount of chaos and stability to control the state of everything. To what end do you figure they would do this?


    • Stu August 15, 2017 at 11:11 am Reply

      Ashkenazi Jews

      WHO KNOWS EH.?


  2. pat June 28, 2015 at 8:32 am Reply

    That was an awesome post with quotes I’d not yet read. You’ve answered lingering questions I had after years of research. Thanks for the info.


  3. daznez July 15, 2015 at 8:17 pm Reply

    bang on, the earth is a stationary plane, the stars are nearby lights in the sky, the sun and moon are much smaller than we have been told and circle overhead as a timepiece in the sky, for us.

    get over it xxx


  4. Piper February 2, 2016 at 12:39 pm Reply

    “All the while the universe is said to be moving outward from the Big Bang at the speed of light! Right!”

    Wrong. Other than that, great post and information.


    • jwlpeace February 2, 2016 at 4:49 pm Reply

      A representation of the evolution of the universe over 13.77 billion years. The far left depicts the earliest moment we can now probe, when a period of “inflation” produced a burst of exponential growth in the universe. (Size is depicted by the vertical extent of the grid in this graphic.) For the next several billion years, the expansion of the universe gradually slowed down as the matter in the universe pulled on itself via gravity. More recently, the expansion has begun to speed up again as the repulsive effects of dark energy have come to dominate the expansion of the universe. The afterglow light seen by WMAP was emitted about 375,000 years after inflation and has traversed the universe largely unimpeded since then. The conditions of earlier times are imprinted on this light; it also forms a backlight for later developments of the universe.


    • Lenio June 13, 2016 at 2:23 am Reply

      I believe the poster of this article was being sarcastic there, Piper.


  5. kreod February 4, 2016 at 10:49 am Reply

    So you are telling me that they cannot see because of asteroid belt. But how the f..k you can see the other planets with an ordinary telescope!!!!


    • jwlpeace February 4, 2016 at 4:07 pm Reply

      “So you are telling me that they cannot see because of asteroid belt”
      What are you talking about here? Who said? When? See what?

      FE theory postulates that these are light beings, not physical land masses. Just another massive lie. What you see through a telescope is light, not physical land mass. The moon is physical, the Earth is physical but the energy beings astronomers call planets is likely advanced living beings, that is why astrology works so well even on FE theory.


  6. […] que la Terre soit plate. Ici, par exemple, « Plane not a planet » explique les contradictions en regard du télescope Hubble qui nous renvoie des photos de galaxies si lointaines que ça frise […]


  7. […] is), then we need to get used to a completely new reality—without Moon landings, satellites, Hubble telescope, International Space Station, or Mars Missions. If, worse still, one of the reasons there’s […]


    • Lesley O'Neil February 12, 2017 at 5:54 pm Reply

      Not true at all. There’s a beautiful full-earth shot taken in 1972 from Apollo 17 It’s here;

      No CGI, film shot. Story of the shot is worth reading. Story from The Atlantic.

      “The incredible story behind an image we’ve all seen hundreds of times, possibly the most reproduced photograph in history”

      Read More:


      • jwlpeace February 12, 2017 at 6:31 pm

        Did you read the article? NASA astro-nots gone “rogue” and took the famous Blue Marble photo on their own? Who be-LIE-ves this shiiite
        “They weren’t supposed to be taking pictures. Photo sessions were scheduled events in a rigorous flight plan that detailed every step essential to success. The film itself was strictly rationed like everything else on those perilous flights; there were 23 magazines onboard for the 70mm Hasselblad cameras, twelve color and eleven black-and-white, all intended for serious documentation purposes. They weren’t supposed to be looking out the window, either. At five hours and a few minutes into the flight of Apollo 17 one of the crewmen looked out the window. What he saw inspired him to grab the only Hasselblad that wasn’t stowed and snap a picture — actually four pictures, no more than a minute apart, changing the exposure after the first one. The second snap yielded the sharper image that’s become famous, so a minute’s attention was involved. But whoever did it said nothing on the radio or to their crewmates about it. It’s possible they did it instinctively, hardly thinking about it, because none of them thought to mention it for weeks”.

        And then they lost 11,000 videos of all Apollo alleged Moon landings! WTF??

        Then you have a NASA employee saying he helped edit and stitch the photos together for the Blue Marble?

        And we have 4,163 “actual” photos of moon shots from the 70’s that we have proven are ALL photoshopped..

        Why is there not ONE live shot of EArth from the Moon??? Why, if we have pics of Mars, Pluto, etc.



      • Lesley O'Neil February 12, 2017 at 9:32 pm

        The Guardian is a reliable publication and has no reason to publish nonsense. It’s nit interested in losing its credibility. I posted the article as an interesting item from the publication. Your copying it as though I had written it might bring you legal problems, and mixing in your own incorrect belief in the subject doesn’t help. If you want to complain about the content, complain to the Guardian and the author of the article, not to me.


      • Lesley O'Neil February 12, 2017 at 9:35 pm

        Oops, that part was from The Atlantic; scratch Guardian reference! (Sorry, Atlantic!)


      • Lesley O'Neil February 12, 2017 at 9:39 pm

        And further, Photoshop didn’t exist in the 70s.


  8. Dragnoxz October 20, 2016 at 3:51 am Reply

    DUDE, the image showing sthe end comarng the fuel tanks are completely DIFFEREENT TANKS, on DIFFERENT FLIGHTS. THE TANKS ARE NOT ALL THE SAME ! And the image of the braces, lol, the one you are shown and it says one is missing is a bad image that does not show a clear enough image of he brace, so of course they will say it is fake. THE IMAGES IS BLURRY !


    • jwlpeace October 20, 2016 at 3:40 pm Reply

      who ever said they were all the same? don’t quote me on things I did not say. thanx.


  9. Ichwanuddn November 12, 2016 at 12:49 am Reply

    until now I don’t believe HoaxBule Telescope, cause by light speed


  10. Lesley O'Neil February 12, 2017 at 5:36 pm Reply

    Wrinkled crotches? You’re basing your decision that things on the ISS are fake on stupid things like that? The wrinkles are there because we humans move around a lot. In space/weightlessness, there is no gravity to pull the wrinkles out, so they stay there.

    It’s not like when you arrive at your hotel room and hang up the stuff from your suitcase to let them get rid of their wrinkles. Simple.


  11. […] is), then we need to get used to a completely new reality—without Moon landings, satellites, Hubble telescope, International Space Station, or Mars Missions. If, worse still, one of the reasons there’s […]


  12. Philippe March 3, 2017 at 4:56 am Reply

    Great info. For me it was a process of elimination, first the moon landing, next it was the Mars Rover, ISS and finally the nail on the coffin is the Hubble Telescope. Now I am fully awakened and under the flat plane model the earth mechanics make a lot more sense. My only unanswered question is who is the intelligent designer and his purpose and motivation. Keep up the great work.


  13. Tom March 4, 2017 at 4:03 pm Reply

    Philippe (or anyone who wishes to share) –
    “FE mechanics”? there is no evidence or explanation for this; consider these as a start:
    * how can the sun and moon can hover at a fixed distance above FE?
    * how can they shift their movements into larger and smaller diameter paths?
    * what causes them to move at all?
    * what causes them to reverse course between large and smaller paths continually?
    * why is Australia shown wider that it is in reality as a southern latitude continent?
    * why are star patterns different in northern and southern latitudes?
    * how can we not see the sun because it is too far away, yet every day still see its light for 30+ minutes (before and after the sun itself is visible)?
    * how is the continually sun visible at the poles for days at a time during the solstice?
    * based on the purported size of the fe sun, how does it provide enough energy to heat the surface of the earth daily as we all experience?
    * what is it that causes there to be light from the fe sun (how does the sun work)?
    * what limits the distance light from the sun travels as it it always above the fe and in our line of sight?
    * what is actually happening during a lunar eclipse, that its face gets dark?
    * why can’t the fe model predict eclipse timing like actually happens in a real world, that we all can validate by watching on every occurrence?
    * why can’t the fe model predict the path of an eclipse as actually happens that we can see ourselves when in the path?


    • misteradhd2 December 8, 2021 at 2:43 pm Reply

      all you know is what nasa has taught and the media, you carry on trusting them, its like you hardcore nasa folk think they are the gos[el and can be trusted lol they have been caught out countless times, you are obviously confirmation biased


      • Philippe February 1, 2022 at 7:02 pm

        The Sun and the Moon don’t travel on a fixed path on FE. In the summer the Sun and the Moon travel in the tropic one Cancer above us therefore closer to the North therefore more light and heat and in the winter the Sun and the Moon travel in the Tropic of Capricorn where the longer circumnavigational path exhibit less light and heat. That’s observable and verifiable. Also the Sun and the Moon never set over the horizon, that’s just an optical illusion as a result of perspective and linear resolution which applies to all things on land, water and air. This is why a commercial jet maintaining the same cruising altitude will appear to go toward the horizon in a downward path as it moves away from you. Simple elementary physics.


      • FactYouAll February 1, 2022 at 8:05 pm

        Re: “The Sun and the Moon don’t travel on a fixed path on FE. In the summer the Sun and the Moon travel in the tropic one Cancer above us therefore closer to the North therefore more light and heat and in the winter the Sun and the Moon travel in the Tropic of Capricorn where the longer circumnavigational path exhibit less light and heat. That’s observable and verifiable.”

        If you want to claim verifiable (or have any credibility at all), you need to provide specific details as to how it “works”.
        As you describe, the route taken in each case is one of an “oscillating” effect, in that the radius of the path is not an actual a circle, but a spiral. What about the spiral causes an expansion and contraction of the radius; synchronized to one year before repeating.
        In addition, the distance covered across the days is in constant acceleration first, and deceleration later; each aligned with a half-year duration.
        What about a flat earth causes such observed apparent motion?
        Your answer will be very interesting to hear; thanks.


      • Philippe February 1, 2022 at 8:18 pm

        If the Earth was truly spinning counterclockwise away from the Moon as it rises the Moon would lead with the top first and then the bottom of the moon would lead as it sets over the horizon but we never see that on the same day and geographical location


      • FactYouAll February 1, 2022 at 9:23 pm

        Re: If the Earth was truly spinning counterclockwise away from the Moon. . . . on the same day and geographical location

        I haven’t a clue how your response relates in any way to my comment today, that you are apparently responding to.

        Care to try again, with some clear context of what you’re trying to address in my recent comment?


      • Philippe February 1, 2022 at 10:48 pm

        Show me photos of the Moon rising with face up and setting with face down from the same geographical location within the same day! If you can’t STFU as you argument is futile.


  14. Philippe May 16, 2017 at 4:29 am Reply

    If this doesn’t convince anyone you are brain dead and already a zombie.


    • Tom May 16, 2017 at 10:01 pm Reply

      Philippe ,

      Stunning avoidance of proving your case with answers to everyday questions, related to human experience. Where is the truth?


      • Tom May 17, 2017 at 10:35 pm


        Saw your photos. I can’t be sure what you are asserting with these, other than these are evidence that these bodies exist.

        I think your words would be helpful to fill in the blanks. 🙂


      • Philippe May 18, 2017 at 4:04 am

        They do exist but not in space. It’s evident that they exist only within our atmosphere.


      • Lesley O'Neil May 18, 2017 at 5:53 am

        What? Have you gone out of your mind? Why would any of these photos lead you to think that the moon is sighing out atmosphere? I’d love to hear your rationale for that statement. Please elaborate!


      • Philippe May 18, 2017 at 9:40 pm

        Because it’s obvious there is no such a thing as space. NASA has proved itt with all their Mickey Mouse operations that are obviously fake. Operation Fishbowl proved that there is an impenetrable dome above us which is The Firmament detailed in the Bible. And even Wernher Von Braun the father of modern rocketry that lead to the development of NASA knew that.

        This is the only thing inscribed on his tombstone. Ultimately he had to reconcile with his maker for participating in the biggest human deception. What he kept referring to, the impossibility of penetrating the Van Allen Belt, was really The Dome.

        Wernher Von Braun
        1912 – 1977
        PSALMS 19:1


      • Tom May 18, 2017 at 4:22 am


        Thanks for providing a broad, thorough, and infallible set of evidence that leads to no possible conclusion besides this simple claim.

        How could anyone have doubted your clear and simple explanation. I especially enjoyed your generous set of footnotes as to the supporting science from those eminent historic researchers (such luminaries).


  15. zenes August 12, 2017 at 10:11 am Reply

    Tom, you have many questions but I have only one: why do they obviously fake satellites, ISS, Earth images when they are really up there?


  16. Lesley O'Neil August 12, 2017 at 9:18 pm Reply

    Zones, I thought this thread would have died a natural death by now, but here it is rearing it’s brainless head again.

    Of course all of NASA’s efforts—and the efforts of all the space agencies owned by other countries—are real and ongoing. It’s difficult for most of us to comprehend why there are still human beings, many in the USA, just don’t believe that there are satellites, the ISS, and many space exploration vehicles out there and feeding back info. Not all NASA’s, either! The UK, France, China, Japan, Central Europe also participate, and ove 70 countries have space agencies at various levels of technology.


  17. Lesley O'Neil August 12, 2017 at 9:22 pm Reply

    Sorry, zenes, I missed the autocorrect of your name to “Zones” before I posted!


    • Philippe August 13, 2017 at 5:26 am Reply

      Ironically the very science that has promoted the heliocentric model as an illusion has also debunk itself through the computer science of CAD, Photoshop and Google Earth, all of which have proven that there is no curvature and rotation which mean there is no space, no Hubble, no ISS and no satellites. You can’t argue with science.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Lesley O'Neil August 13, 2017 at 5:44 am

        Well, you are still wrong as you were wen I first saw your thread.


      • Philippe August 14, 2017 at 6:51 pm

        The trigonometry equation for the curvature is based on the circumference, diameter and radius of the earth. To this day there has never been proof based on these mathematical calculations that a earth curvature exists. Using CAD, Photoshop and Google Earth there has NOT been identifiable evidence of any curvature. If you can prove it with the Distance X Square X 8 inches that there is an earth curvature you will be the first. So unless you have evidence the earth remains a flat plane and static.


      • Lesley O'Neil August 14, 2017 at 11:25 pm

        The original photos were on FILM, don’t you know how to read? There was no Photoshop or digital photography in the 1960s. You keep shooting yourself in the foot.

        Also, digital photography and CGI are two different things. Both of those things have to be digitized for use on the Internet, but they differ. Further, film images have to be digitized in order to be shown on the Internet.

        Do you really think that the documentary films about WWs I and II are only CGI, just because they’re viewable on our computers and tablets? Do you not understand the meaning of CGI—Computer Generated Imagery? Films, videos, and still images captured by cameras, via traditional film or digitally, are NOT CGI. For heaven’s sake, do yourself a favour and learn a little before you lose any faith others might have in your comments.

        As for my considering you a flat-earther, that arose because your blog, or whatever you want to call it, is headed; planes are flat. Perhaps you should have calllef it aplaintruth, but of course there isn’t much ‘truth’ involved in your comments.


      • Philippe August 15, 2017 at 5:57 am

        If you can’t prove the earth is a sphere with the existing curvature equation then the earth is flat. There is no evidence of the Heliocentric model. Show me the proof of the earth curvature using the math? Until then you have no case. You can spin the facts all you want the reality is that the earth is flat and static unless you can prove otherwise. At any distance all things remain perfectly perpendicular to the surface of the earth. And at any distance after the first mile Distance X Square X 8 inches doesn’t not exist because there is NO curvature. Therefore your own science that created that equation based on circumference, diameter and radius of the earth is total bullshit. You cannot prove the curvature exist. Case closed.


      • FactYouAll August 14, 2017 at 1:41 am


        Ironically you attempted to offer [conclusive] proof(?) of a claim, without ever including any supporting evidence. Astonishing.


      • Philippe August 14, 2017 at 2:44 am

        All the evidence that the earth is flat and static has been proven numerous times with CAD, Photoshop and Google Earth. All these computer softwares have demonstrated that there is NO curvature and NO rotation. We live in the same geocentric model that was discovered thousands of years ago by all major religions.


      • Lesley O'Neil August 14, 2017 at 2:57 am

        You lie like a rug. All those NOs you state are totally incorrect. And our universe is certainly not geocentric. Good grief man, are you just stating all this nonsense to become infamous by marking all these unrealistic beliefs down on your personal history?


      • Philippe August 14, 2017 at 6:58 pm

        Unless you can prove the earth is a sphere with the curvature equation you have no case period. Show me the curvature with the science that we have?


      • FactYouAll August 15, 2017 at 2:42 am


        You are originating claims of a FE in your words above this comment (August 13, 2017 at 5:26 am), therefore you have the honor of defending your claims.

        Bonus points for providing FE calculations for predicting an eclipse.


      • FactYouAll February 1, 2022 at 8:08 pm

        Re: “all the evidence that the earth is flat and static has been proven numerous times with CAD, Photoshop and Google Earth.”

        Um, Google Earth is based on data for a globe.


  18. Lesley O'Neil August 14, 2017 at 2:51 am Reply

    Philippe, the VERY FIRST thing you state in your backstory is totally incorrect. NASA isn’t the only space agency to make a FULL photo of Earth in space. The Japanese space agency has taken one of the best, that we often see—not NASA’s astronauts.


    • Philippe August 14, 2017 at 6:55 pm Reply

      It doesn’t matter since like NASA’s they are all CGI easily debunked with Photoshop and CAD as they both leave digital fingerprints that can only be created with computer technology and not real footage. All this nonsense is futile anyway since the earth is flat and static therefore nothing rotates in space. It’s all entertainment at a high price.


      • Lesley O'Neil August 14, 2017 at 11:32 pm

        And right here, you state the earth is flat! If that doesn’t make you a flat-earthier, a don’t know what does. Do you forget what you write, from one day to the next?


      • Lesley O'Neil August 14, 2017 at 11:41 pm

        CGI (Computer Generated Imagery) and photographs, either digital or on film, are totallly different things.


  19. Lesley O'Neil August 14, 2017 at 11:33 pm Reply

    Autocarrot working again. Flat-earther, not flat-earthier!


  20. Rick January 10, 2018 at 5:58 am Reply

    Nasa=Total Si-Fi BS


  21. George January 28, 2019 at 7:04 pm Reply

    There are two parts to consider: observations, and conclusions.
    Flat Earth believers are correct on some observations, unlike Globe Earthers who generally, but with limited exceptions, have NO observations, but instead just keep repeating a tiring set of “Everybody knows Earth is round because we saw photographs” mentality. However, conclusions are more complicated because there are still unknowns.

    Once you KNOW that governments and government agencies lie, it becomes rather simple to spot various lies, because the data and facts are inconsistent but presented with a straight face. However people who trust and believe their government are experiencing strong DENIAL that seeks to protect them from the truth- which they cannot handle.

    They have no interest in learning the truth and will only argue to protect themselves out if reflex. There is no arguing with them. They cannot be turned.

    For the seekers of knowledge, other models of reality should be considered including Concentric Earth and Simulated Earth Theory as these explain some observed facts about our place. More disquieting, these ideas are also not allowed for people who fear reality and seek comfort of belief.


  22. misteradhd2 December 8, 2021 at 3:23 pm Reply

    all these people saying photoshop didn’t exist in the 60s etc, all technology has been suppressed and gets released every year and we get told its new technology, money is the big motivator here, people will argue that there are no lies, ITS ALL LIES, cognitive dissonance makes people warped and confused and confirmation biased makes people delusional, so many coincidences but not enough truth…in reality, they are not coincidences, people so badly want to believe that NASA is the gospel truth because they know so much about space, but that’s like knowing so much about magic, you may know fancy math to go with it but it doesn’t mean it’s true, its arrogance and pride, people hate to be wrong, and all these space lovers, why are you so insulting to people? sarcasm and making fun is the lack of an opinion, copy and pasting stuff from google don’t make you smart either, it makes you lazy, and making fun of the flat earthers makes you look ridiculous, so what, they did some research and found errors with the heliocentric model and proof that NASA are liars, these insulting child people claim to be seekers of the truth but just make excuses for the lies and use the fraudulent maths and fake images and videos as proof, then show their photos of stars and planets but they just look like sonolumination to me, people would rather believe aliens come billions of light-years away and play hide and seek, whats with all the 666 coincidences too? all to do with the heliocentric model and the tilt etc, why is this? why so many coincidences, then they use this magical math that says a glass is full and empty at the same time and use the same math to say here look, see its a globe and everything is spinning crazily and nobody feels a thing because its a constant speed, BUT ITS NOT, an elliptical orbit means there’s deviations in speed so that’s wrong, but still we don’t get to see that, all this new proof of NASA faking space, bubbles in space, even scuba-divers with flippers, why are they up there? you can find these, then i did my own investigation on the hubble photos, how the hell do they change the camera to take 8k images, who would survive travelling almost 20k mph? in the thermosphere? and the images are fake, the backgrounds are all drawings and the stars are copy and pasted in, every single one of them is the same with even some of the stars having different size pixels, a simple test…that would suggest some of the stars are from another generated image, even some of the stars are exactly the same, all have a square box around them too which suggests they aren’t from that image, anybody can do this but I doubt the NASA lovers will because of their cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias, they do not want to be proven wrong, its why they result to making fun of flat earthers and getting angry, it’s their core belief being attacked and because it conflicts with their given narrative that they are so desperate to believe they get angered because they are confused so they make excuses then go on google to confirm their delusions because google is their friend even though its all censored, it’s ok to believe in religion but flat earth is made fun of yet religion has some strange stuff attached to it, cellestial beings mated with earth women and made nephillim, but these NASA lovers will believe in that and god but not flat earth, thats cognitive dissonance, 1 or more conficting beliefs, they will also believe the evolution theory that was invented by masonic weirdos, like they dont even know that the romans used sedimentary rock to build their roads and the egyptians and the greeks, all these civilisations loved to catalogue fossiles but never did they catalogue any stupid impossible creatures that have impossible body ratios lol they were meant to exist for about 200 million years yet bones are so rare lol and were only discovered my masonic “experts” in the late 1800s, these bones should be everywhere in abundance but are only discovered by experts in remote regions, thats called convenience, i knoq for a fact some child grown ups will make fun of my logic, but this is logic, i bet they dont even know that the first dinosaur discovered was just a tooth that belonged to a type of pig, the big bang space dinosaurs and evolution are all part of the same hoax, to make you think we are not important, that an accident created us,I have aspergers and ADHD and it seems a lot more people like me seem to see outside the box more clearly, we arent blindind by pride and arrogance, we dont make fun of people who believe the lies and make excuses for them, i use the exact words for what they are experiencing, delusions, pride, arrogance, cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias…its about time people start waking up and let go of the narrative that makes us seem unimportant so those who are rich are the masters, thats all just so very convenient and what a coincidence…


  23. FactYouAll February 1, 2022 at 8:17 pm Reply

    Re: “here look, see its a globe and everything is spinning crazily and nobody feels a thing because its a constant speed, BUT ITS NOT, an elliptical orbit means there’s deviations in speed so that’s wrong”

    We will all be lifted after you do the math for your elliptical effect, as to the difference from circular, given the known facts/measurements about earth. Thanks!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: