UN Convention Center…Does it get any clearer the message???
Oh, the irony!
Google Knows Flat Earth
Discovered in 2004, 55 Cancri e, at twice the Earth’s size and eight times its mass, is called “Super Earth”. Aside from graphite and other silicates, its main component is diamond. It is made of crystallized diamond, with 1/3rd of its mass being pure diamond. Once a star in a binary system, its partner started eat at it, leaving only the gem core. Its temperature is 3900°F. Its Earth value is $26.9 nonillion, 384 quintillion times Earth’s GDP of $74 trillion. Mining only 0.182% of it would pay off the total debt of $50 trillion of all the governments in the world. They just have to travel 40 light years.
There are almost 2000 exoplanets in the universe that have so far been discovered. The remarkable features of many of these strange and mysterious planets outside the solar system often leave the world of science absolutely confounded, when fact about the universe and it hidden planets sound stranger than fiction.
I’m rethinking how to distribute the Flat Earth books and wish not to deal with overseas sales, shipping, pay pal, checks, post office, mailers, postage, ordering books, storing books, labor, etc….
SO, simply, when it goes live on Amazon I’ll set a significant early bird sales price at discount for a couple of weeks for first responders then go to list price of $22 for a Black & White, $32 for color. I have the proofs and the color copies rock! (I have net lower margins on color due to much higher production costs, fyi)
The books are coming out of Create Space, a subsidiary of Amazon…sorry to have to use the monster but I thought worth it to get this important book out.
I really like how its turned out and am proud to offer it.
Bottom line, check back to this site. Final proofing now.
Sorry for any confusion.
Flat Earth; Investigations Into a Massive 500 yr. Heliocentric Lie
Much of Flat Earth logic, thought, and reason are available to those that wish to confirm FE theory for themselves while at the same time disproving heliocentrism as a viable cosmological possibility.
We know that the Earth isn’t flat, and have known this for hundreds of years. There are many ways to demonstrate this, from ships’ masts disappearing as they sail out over the horizon, to your ability to see farther at higher altitudes, to the longer shadows cast by the Sun at higher latitudes, to measuring the shape of the Moon’s shadow on the Earth during a solar eclipse, to actually going to space and seeing the shape of the Earth for yourself.
But just because the Earth isn’t flat doesn’t necessarily mean a planet couldn’t be. In fact, there are many observations that we make that would be consistent with a flat, circular Earth.
So how close could we actually get to a flat planet? One strategy would be to take a solid slab of material — stone, steel, or something even harder like diamond or graphene — and build the largest flat disk you could. If you used conventional materials like this, you could create a thin, flat disk many hundreds of kilometers in radius that was stable. In other words, you could make a flat world that was larger than any object in our asteroid belt, and possibly even nearly the size of our Moon.
But it wouldn’t be a planet if you did it that way. Back in 2006, we famously set forth the three criteria for defining a planet. (That definition has since been extended to exoplanets, too!) In order to be a planet, a world:
That second part of the definition is what fails for our specially-created flat, thin world. If it isn’t massive enough to pull itself into hydrostatic equilibrium, it can’t be classified as a planet.
But there is a way to create a relatively flat planet: have it spin. Here on Earth, our planet is a relatively slow spinner: it takes 24 hours for us to rotate a full 360°. This means that a person living on the equator, the maximal distance from the Earth’s axis of rotation, experiences an extra speed of 464 meters per second (about 1,000 miles per hour) compared to someone at the poles. This extra speed affects the entire shape of the Earth, and causes it to elongate into a shape known as an oblate spheroid: a near-perfect sphere that’s flattened at the poles and elongated at the equator.
The diameter of the Earth at the equator is 12,756 km, while at the poles its only 12,714 km. You are 21 kilometers closer to the center of the Earth standing at the North Pole than you are at the equator. This doesn’t seem like much, but there are worlds out there that rotate far faster. The gas giants all rotate quite quickly, with Saturn’s poles compressed by 10% relative to its equator.
Flat Earth; An Investigation Into a Massive 500-year Lie, will be out in 2-3 weeks. Email me @ firstname.lastname@example.org for first copy, discounted, signed if you want copy. I’ll notify you when books are ready to ship for mailing addresses.
Thanx for your support,
The aim of this post is to present an accurate and comprehensive picture of what the stars are and how they move in the night sky, as simple observation tells us that they are not at all what NASA tell us that they are.
It is also my hope that this post may inspire you to look upon the night sky with new eyes and with renewed child-like curiosity.
If you are new to this blog, please note that this is article #27 in a series of articles that have been presented as a chronological and logical narrative.
That being the case, you may find it useful to read from the start (follow the links in the header above), or to at least check out the Table of Contents page for a “spark-notes” summary of previous material discussed in this blog, before continuing here. The recap below might also offer some useful guidance.
This post will build upon material presented in earlier posts, particularly what was presented in Post #16 through to Post #24.
Here is a quick summary to refresh your memory of what was covered in those posts:
To round things off, here’s a quick summary of what we’ve looked at in this post:
To start, we saw that the sun is not a star, and that the stars are not at all what we’ve been told.
You were then shown some videos involving cymatics, sonoluminescence, superconductivity, and quantum levitation, which go a long way to explaining what we are seeing in the sky.
We then moved on to deconstructing the parallax lie, before taking a dreamy look at star trails and the amazing astrolabe, which led us to study the astroplate.
In other words, a lot of awesome stuff that proves that we’ve been lied to about the stars.
This post has shone plenty of light on the lies we’ve been fed by these guys…
… but what you’ve seen so far doesn’t even scratch the surface of the knowledge being hidden from you.
Rest assured though, we’re going to be slicing through many more of their lies and hidden knowledge like a hot knife cutting through butter, so stay tuned! 🙂
The origins of satellites came from the mind of famous science-fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke. He wrote The 1945 Proposal by Arthur C. Clarke for Geostationary Satellite Communications. Arthur C. Clarke was a high level Freemason as well as a homosexual and self-professed pedophile, throw in satanism and you’ve got a heck of a guy. Arthur C. Clarke was writing science fiction stories along with other notable sci-fi writers Philip K. Dick, Robert Heinlein and L. Ron Hubbard. Arthur C. Clarke did initially claim to know Hubbard, however later he denied that statement and thought L. Ron Hubbard to be completely crazy. That link to Hubbard had to be broken, all out rebuke works well.
There is a seven year overlap between 1945 to 1952 when Jack Parsons, L. Ron Hubbard and Arthur C. Clarke were all alive and were witness to the Science Fiction industry exploding into the eager minds of young people. I find the Roswell crash in July 1947 quite timely and it certainly propelled the interest in space to mania levels.Hollywood didn’t miss the cue since they’re owned by the Khazarian Rothschilds. Hollywood started cranking out sci-fi movies by the truckload. At the top of the Sci-Fi movie heap was the great undiscovered frontier — Space
The Khazarians saw an opportunity to make a ton of money by pushing the space meme. At some point a scheme was hatched to fake launch satellites into space for profit. NASA also became a tool to constantly remind humans of our insignificance in the boundless cosmic order. NASA has been beating the divinity out of us with pseudoscience, propaganda and spiritual delineation. In other words “control” Pre-NASA had accumulated and assimilated the intellectual property from Jack Parsons to the point where he was no longer needed or wanted. Sputnik 1 was launched first in 1957 shocking fooling the world and Explorer 1 soon followed in 1958 the year NASA was created. NASA was also created to militarize space and the atmosphere below it, but why?
Simple, in order to conceal the deceptions of the Khazarian Mafia and their Freemason minions, the Khazarians needed to “secure” the perimeter and operate above any jurisdiction. All information above our heads skyward was now in the hands of NASA as the “official” source, in other words the propaganda machine was created. It’s laughable when you realize we’re solely reliant on just one source for all information regarding the cosmos–NASA. Along with the Controlled Major Mass Media NASA is free to dispense as much GGI/Pixar/Photshop fairy tales as fast as we can gobble them up. I guarantee the satanists of NASA have been laughing along time about their ruses, however they’re being exposed more than ever as incompetent pseudoscience degenerates when real scrutiny is applied.
Seemingly unrelated, in 1959 the Antarctic treaty was signed and is now totally off limits backed by military force. The North Pole is also militarized, though no formal multilateral agreement exists. Still any attempt to traverse either will result in immediate military expulsion and possible jail-time. To date no human has ever traversed Antarctica, EVER!! Think about that for a moment and consider the absurdity of it. There’s still a continent that has never been explored and we’re not allowed access to it! Why?
As the Flat Earth movement picks up steam, many questions have been addressed but still more remain.
The elegant simplicity of the electromagnetic dome does not require any more understanding than a few basic principles and an eager and open mind.
One of the more perplexing questions is the fact that earth is roughly 75% salt-water. In retrospect, it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense since humans and most animals need fresh water to survive and maintain bodily functions.
What use could the salt-water possibly have that relates to us? As you will see in this short video primer, salt-water has everything to do with powering the earth and it’s biosphere. It just so happens that salt-water makes a really effective electrolytic solution to conduct electricity and move electrons from the anode (+) to the cathode (-). In other words, the Arctic Circle is the anode and the Antarctic Ice shelf is the cathode. Note: (the anode and cathode (+) (-) seem to be interchangeable and exact configuration is unknown at this time)
The only thing needed are electrolytic metals and an external power source. The metals can be Zinc, Magnesium, Copper, Nickel, Gold, Aluminum, Iron, Brass and others in various arrays and percentages. The external electrical charge is the earths Schumann Resonance which is 7.83 Mhz and provides the power to create a chemical reaction whereby electrons from Zinc for example, will peel away and move to copper. This process is called Oxidation and Reduction.
The following rules hold true for both electrolytic and galvanic/voltaic cells.
It’s this chemical reaction that creates electromagnetism, the Aether and the electromagentic dome we call home. Charles Augustine De-Coulomb, J.J. Thomson and the great Nikola Tesla were onto this fact and were buried by the powers that shouldn’t be. The quote by Nikola Tesla below encapsulates the unseen and unheard primary importance of electromagnetism and our very existence.