AstroNOT Scott Kelly Gets Asked about Bubbles in Space

8 thoughts on “AstroNOT Scott Kelly Gets Asked about Bubbles in Space

  1. BoB November 6, 2017 at 1:28 am Reply

    What a liar. How does he sleep at night ?

    Like

    • FactYouAll November 7, 2017 at 5:45 am Reply

      I agree, the audience member has no evidence and no credibility.

      Like

      • poolman November 7, 2017 at 1:00 pm

        I’m certain you know he meant Kelly the liar. The evidence is all over the internet. The audience member’s ‘evidence’ is his charge for anyone to go ogle ‘bubbles in space’, which will bring up a multitude of ‘space walks’ showing bubbles escaping and proving they are actually underwater. There are even reflections of scuba divers in their ‘space helmet’ face masks. The vacuum of space is a lie. Outer space is a lie. Nasa is a place for liars to congregate and dispel falsities in the name of science.

        You have been here long enough to discover the real truth of our flat earth plane, yet you insist on being that spinning globe defender. You cannot prove your world with factual evidence, but insist we flat earthers prove ours. And when we do successfully prove a FE fact, you quickly deny it.

        Maybe FactDenyAll would be a more accurate handle…

        Like

      • FactYouAll November 7, 2017 at 2:50 pm

        Poolman, at best what you can see are “particles” in space, reflecting sun light. They don’t behave like bubbles as we know them.

        BTW; perhaps you might want to research/google “dispel falsities” to understand what that would mean. 🙂

        Like

  2. garethwatkinson@hotmail.co.uk November 10, 2017 at 10:53 pm Reply

    FactYouAll is clearly a shilly troll bot.

    Just ignore the dishonest POS, poolman.

    Best wishes,

    Copper

    Like

    • FactYouAll November 14, 2017 at 4:24 am Reply

      Empty claims about me proves you can just as easily make empty claims about the nature of earth. These comments are unrelated to reality and lack seriousness.

      Since your post has nothing to say about the matters presented and discussed here, it wouldn’t be any type of loss if it were to disappear.

      Like

      • jwlpeace November 14, 2017 at 6:29 pm

        FYou All,
        it’s time you disappear
        this site is not about you
        and you offer no contribution of relevance
        to the FE conversation

        Like

      • FactYouAll November 14, 2017 at 7:22 pm

        jwlpeace,

        I made specific on-topic comments earlier above on the nature of the video, and if there are bubbles or not. My detractor, garethwatkinson, did not reply in kind; instead making unfounded personal attacks with vulgarity. AFAIK, his comments were abstract to the point of not being about this article/video in any way.

        I would gladly compare my comments to his, and relevance to this topic; I can live with the facts of exactly what we each wrote.

        If the FE question is already 100% proven, with no counter-phenomena or explanations that explain our reality and existence (not always what we see); then I agree. My asking questions and pointing out alternate possibilities to the articles posted here is not relevant.

        However, if there is any doubt, or unanswered questions, or possible false assumptions or conclusions, then asking questions is the only way to resolve such things.

        So I ask; if everything we can ever know about FE perfectly satisfactory, and there is nothing more to understand; who will then claim the ultimate truth and announce themselves as all knowing.

        Cheers.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: