Is Sir Isaac Newton’s “Law of Gravity” Just One Great Big 500 Yr. Old Lie?

You do look, my son, in a moved sort, As if you were dismay’d. Be cheerful, sir. Our revels now are ended. These our actors, As I foretold you, were all spirits and Are melted into air, into thin air; And, like the baseless fabric of this vision, The cloud-capp’d towers, the gorgeous palaces, The solemn temples, the great globe itself, Yea, all which it inherit, shall dissolve, And, like this insubstantial pageant faded, Leave not a rack behind. We are such stuff As dreams are made on, and our little life Is rounded with a sleep.

Wm. Shakespeare from the Tempest—Act IV, sc. i



The name is derived from the Latin word “ gravis,” which means “ heavy,” “ having weight,” while the Law of Gravitation is defined as “ That mutual action between masses of matter by virtue of which every such mass tends toward every other with a force varying directly as the product of the masses, and inversely as the square of their distances apart.”

Empirical Research:
A way of gaining knowledge by means of direct and indirect observation or experience.  Much of Newton’s evidence was collected by observations,directly and indirectly, then with logical reasoning, he made informed decisions….


Direct Observations
Newton noted that apples always fall  vertically (straight down). Apples never fall up or sideways. Since the apples are falling in one direction, vertically, instead of speed, scientists call the motion velocity.

Velocity is the speed of a moving object in a certain direction.

A Force is any action (a push or pull) that causes an object to change in speed, change in direction, or change in shape. As long as the force is applied, the speed of the object continues to change; and/or the direction of the object continues to change; and/or the shape of the object continues to change.

Newton’s hypothesis was that some(?) Force was pulling the apples vertically downward.  Newton coined the word “gravity” to name this force.

~ Note that the word “weight” is left out of the definition of Newston’s Law of Gravity.


Big Bang

Gravity, the Primordial Glue of all Life in the Universe

SO, the “Official Universally Accepted Modern Scientific Story of our Creation” as agreed by the highest degrees of academia, physics and astronomical science tells us that after the Big Bang… after atoms were created out nothing, from absolutely nothing….some 14.3 Billion years ago, our entire Universe came to be.

Then the atoms, through unidentified attractions began to hook up (sex atoms?). They then began creating dust particles and gaseous vapors made up primarily of hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen.

All the while exploding outward at the speed of light, projecting in all directions at an unfathomable 670 million miles-per-hour for billions and billions and billions of years .

Out of this Primordial soup stars began to form including our maybe one and only Sun. Then, about 4.5 Billion years ago, so we are told, the Sun spun us off into the ether of space where we flew away from her at such great speeds that we settled some 93 million miles away from him in a locked not so perfect orbit.

Out of this all minerals and gases were formed including our multi’-layered atmosphere, all minerals like gold, and all sentient life as well as life-giving water.

Atomic clock
FOCS 1, a continuous cold caesium fountain atomic clock in Switzerland, started operating in 2004 at an uncertainty of one second in 30 million years.

The Earth settled into such perfect orbit billions of years ago that an atomic clock can measure our past, present and future time of spin and revolution down to nano seconds, never varying for million of years to come.

The Moon stuck in our orbit all the while traveling around our girth at 2,333 mph over the course of a little less than 28 days while it slowly rotates as well yet pulling our tidal waters up and down twice a day from some 238,000 miles away.

Earth settled completely down so that we now orbit some 533 million miles back to start in one birthday year traveling at 1,000 miles per second to do so. This is also in lockstep with Earth’s rotation of 1,000 miles per hour each day, traveling 24,383 miles around the Equator each and every day in atomic perfect time keeping.

We are told we are stuck like glue to Earth, as well as all buildings and all oceans of this world even with all this spin and revolution, except when a butterfly flies or a man jumps in the air or a plane takes off .

And we all stay velcroed to Earth, the Moon to us, the Sun holding both in orbits as well as Mercury, Mars, Venus, Saturn, the Asteroid belt, Jupiter, Uranus, Neptune and Pluto for billions and billions of years…

…all due because of Gravity!

There’s just one huge problem, it’s all a lie! A Great Big Lie. All of it. And 99.9% of all on Earth believe this to be true without question or investigation.


Most people in England have either read, or heard, that Sir Isaac Newton’s theory of gravitation was originated by his seeing an apple fall to earth from a tree in his garden.

Persons gifted with ordinary common sense would say the apple fell down to earth because, bulk for bulk, it was heavier than the surrounding air’ but if, instead of an apple, a fluffy feather been detached from a tree, a breeze would probably have sent the feather floating away, and the feather would not reach the earth until the surrounding air became so still that, by virtue of its own density, the feather would fall to the ground.”  “Lady Blount, “Clarion’s Science Versus God’s Truth”.

“Give up a drop and gain the whole ocean”  ~ Satchidananda

  “If you fill a balloon with helium, a substance lighter than the nitrogen, oxygen and other elements which compose the air around it, the balloon will immediately fly upwards. If you fill a balloon with hydrogen, a substance even lighter than helium, the balloon will fly upwards even faster.

If you blow a dandelion seed out of your hands, a substance just barely heavier than the air, it will float away and slowly but eventually fall to the ground. And if you drop an anvil from your hands, something much heavier than the air, it will quickly and directly fall straight to the ground.

Now, this has absolutely nothing to do with “gravity.” The fact that light things rise up and heavy things fall down is simply a natural property of weight. That is very different from “gravity.” Gravity is a hypothetical magnetic-like force possessed by large masses which Isaac Newton needed to help explain the heliocentric theory of the universe.

Now, even if gravity did exist, why would it cause both planets to orbit the Sun and people to stick to the Earth? Gravity should either cause people to float in suspended circular orbits around the Earth, or it should cause the Earth to be pulled and crash into the Sun! What sort of magic is “gravity” that it can glue people’s feet to the ball-Earth, while causing Earth itself to revolve ellipses round the Sun?

The two effects are very different yet the same cause is attributed to both.” ~ Eric Dubay, Atlantean Conspiracy


Earth spinning at 1,000 mph, which no one has ever felt, is checked by invisible gravity holding us down some 233 times greater than the external spinning Earth force, so the story goes…

Sir Isaac Newton’s Big Lie Mistake

Reduced to simplicity, gravitation is said to be “ That which attracts every thing toward every other thing.” That does not tell us much ; and yet the little it does tell us is not true ; for a thoughtful observer knows very well that everything is not attracted towards every other thing. . . The definition implies that it is a force ; but it does not say so, for that phrase “ mutual action ” is ambiguous, and not at all convincing.

The Encyclopaedia Britannica tells us that “ The Law of Gravitation is unique among the laws of nature, not only for its wide generality, taking the whole universe into its scope, but in the fact that, so far as is yet known, it is absolutely unmodified by any condition or cause whatever.”

There is not anything or force in the universe that is absolute! No thing that goes its own way and does what it will without regard to other forces or things. The thing is impossible; and it is not true; wherefore it has fallen to me to show where the inconsistency in it lies.

The name given to this mutual action means “ weight,” and weight is one of the attributes of all
matter. Merely to say that anything is matter or material implies that it has weight, while to speak of weight implies matter. Matter and weight are inseparable, they are not laws, but elemental facts. They exist.

But it has been suggested that gravitation is a force, indeed we often hear it referred to as the force of gravitation ; but force is quite a different thing than weight, it is active energy expressed by certain conditions and combinations of matter. It acts.

All experience and observation goes to prove that material things fall to earth because they possess the attribute of weight, and that an object remains suspended in air or space only so long as its weight is overcome by a force, which is contrary.

And when we realize these simple facts we see that gravitation is in reality conditioned and modified by every other active force, both great and small.

(note NASA logo)

Again, gravitation is spoken of as a pull, an agent of attraction that robs weight of its meaning, something that brings all terrestrial things down to earth while at the same time it keeps the heavenly bodies in their places and prevents them falling toward each other or apart. The thing is altogether too wonderful, it is not natural; and the theory is scientifically
unsound. . .

Every man, however great his genius, must be limited by the conditions that surround him ; and
science in general was not sufficiently advanced two hundred years ago to be much help to Newton, so that— for lack of information which is ordinary knowledge to us hving in the 20th century— he fell into the error of attributing the effects of “ weight ” and “ force ” to a common cause, which— for want of a better term— he called gravitation ;

but I have not the slightest doubt that if he were living now he would have arrived at the following more reasonable conclusions:— That terrestrial things fall to earth by “ gravis,” weight; because they are matter ; while the heavenly bodies (which also are matter) do not fall because they are maintained in their courses by magnetic or electric force. (Source)


“It was said, in effect, by Newton, and has ever since been insisted upon by his disciples: ‘Allow us, without proof, which is impossible, the existence of two universal forces –centrifugal and centripetal, or attraction and repulsion, and we will construct a theory which shall explain all the leading phenomena and mysteries of Nature.’

An apple falling from a tree, or a stone rolling downwards and a pail of water tied to a string and set in motion were assumed to be types of the relations existing among all the bodies in the universe. The moon was assumed to have a tendencey to fall towards the earth, and the earth and moon together towards the sun.

The same relation was assumed to exist between all the smaller and larger luminaries in the firmament; and it soon became necessary to extend these assumptions to infinity. The universe was parcelled out into systems–co-existent and illimitable.

Suns, planets, satellites, and comets, were assumed to exist infinite in number and boundless in extent; and to enable the theorists to explain alternating and constantly recurring phenomena, which were everywhere observable, these numberless and for-ever-extending objects were assumed to be spheres.

The earth we inhabit was called a planet, and because it was thought to be reasonable that the luminous objects in the firmament, which were called planets, were spherical and had motion–ergo, the earth is gblobe and moves upon axes, and in an orbit round the sun!

And as the earth is a globe and is inhabited, so again it is only reasonable to conclude that the planets are worlds like the earth, and are inhabited by sentient beings. What reasoning! What shameful perversion of intellectual gifts!”  Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy”



  Furthermore, this magnetic-like attraction of massive objects gravity is purported to have can be found nowhere in the natural world. There is no example in nature of a massive sphere or any other shaped-object which by virtue of its mass alone causes smaller objects to stick to or orbit around it!

There is nothing on Earth massive enough that it can be shown to cause even a dust-bunny to stick to or orbit around it! Try spinning a wet tennis ball or any other spherical object with smaller things placed on its surface and you will find that everything falls or flies off, and nothing sticks to or orbits it.

To claim the existence of a physical “law” without a single practical evidential example is hearsay, not science. ~ Eric Dubay

Gravity is the lynchpin that holds all heliocentric theory together.

It is what holds everything to everything else. King Velcro. Except when it isn’t, like when a butterfly flies and flitter’s or a person jumps up or when an airplane takes off.

Gravity, physicists tell us, is invisible and undetectable by using human senses, we are told. The source of gravity is a mutual attraction principle determined by its mass to another mass. “Weight” is a measure of the gravitational pull between two objects.

The famous story goes that Gravity was “discovered” by Sir Isaac Newton, former President of the Royal Society of London, Head Coin Minter for the Crown of England and Freemason.

This was later expanded by A. Einstein’s “Relativity Theory” which allowed gravity to cause a spacetime curvature, in effect saying that even light was bent due to gravitational pull.

All school children have been taught for several generations that an apple falling from a tree was his “aha” moment when he realized, then said to prove mathematically, that some type of Earth “tractor beam” was the attraction that pulled the apple to the surface.

He then went on to “prove” that gravity was also beholden in all of the spinning orbs and that this validated the works of previous Freemasons and Roman Catholic priests such as Nick Copernicus and Johan Kepler.

For thousands and thousands years before this magic discovery, geocentrists believed that it was the mass, or simply the weight and aerodynamics of the object that caused it to fall to earth alone. For if the world was a flat plane, this was a natural observable phenomenon combined with common sense.


How is it that “gravity” is so strong that it can hold all the oceans, buildings and people stuck to the under-side of the ball-Earth, but so weak that it allows birds, bugs, smoke, and balloons to casually evade its grips completely!?

How is it that “gravity” holds our bodies clung to the under-side of the ball-Earth, but yet we can easily raise our legs and arms, walk or jump and feel no such constant downward pulling force?

How is it that “gravity” can cause planets to revolve elliptical orbits around a single center of attraction?

Ellipses by nature require two foci, and the force of gravitation would have to regularly increase and decrease to keep planets in constant orbit and prevent pulling them into direct collision courses!  ~ Eric Dubay

Q: So why does a wet tennis ball fling water outward when gravity, applying to all objects big and small, and is 233 times stronger than even the centrifugal force of an Earth spinning on axis at 1,000 mph?

Heliocentric Science Answers:
Shell Theorem
In classical mechanics, the shell theorem gives gravitational simplifications that can be applied to objects inside or outside a spherically symmetrical body. This theorem has particular application to astronomy.
Isaac Newton proved the shell theorem[1] and said that:
1. A spherically symmetric body affects external objects gravitationally as though all of its mass were concentrated at a point at its centre.
2. If the body is a spherically symmetric shell (i.e., a hollow ball), no net gravitational force is exerted by the shell on any object inside, regardless of the object’s location within the shell.
~ So gravity only works when solid objects only are involved? Then what about huge gaseous planets like Jupiter and Saturn that orbit the Sun??


“If the sun is pulling with such magnificent gravity power at the earth and all her sister planets, why does not they fall onto the Sun?”

( —New research by a team of European physicists could explain why the universe did not collapse immediately after the Big Bang.

Studies of the Higgs particle – discovered at CERN in 2012 and responsible for giving mass to all – have suggested that the production of Higgs particles during the accelerating expansion of the very early universe (inflation) should have led to instability and collapse.

Scientists have been trying to find out why this didn’t happen, leading to theories that there must be some that will help explain the origins of the universe that has not yet been discovered. Physicists from Imperial College London, and the Universities of Copenhagen and Helsinki, however, believe there is a simpler explanation.

In a new study in Physical Review Letters, the team describe how the spacetime curvature – in effect, gravity – provided the stability needed for the universe to survive expansion in that early period. The team investigated the interaction between the Higgs particles and gravity, taking into account how it would vary with energy.

They show that even a small interaction would have been enough to stabilise the universe against decay. (Source)



 Moon, 1/6th the Gravity pull and 1/4 the size of Earth, travels 238,000 miles and Moves our Oceans Up and Down Twice Each and Every Day… and travels East to West, no matter what you see with your own eyes….so the story goes.

Even Sir Isaac Newton himself confessed that the explanation of the Moon’s action on the Tides was the least satisfactory part of his theory of Gravitation. This theory asserts that the larger object attracts the smaller, and the mass of the Moon being reckoned as only one-eighth of that of the Earth, it follows that, if, by the presumed force of Gravitation, the Earth revolves round the Sun, much more, for the same reason, should the Moon do so likewise, instead of which that willful orb still continues to go round our world.

Tides vary greatly in height, owing chiefly to the different configurations of the adjoining lands. At Chepstow it rises to 60 feet, at Portishead to 50, while at Dublin Bay it is but 1 2, and at Wexford only 5 feet … That the Earth itself has a slight tremulous motion may be seen in the movement of the spirit-level, even when fixed as steadily as possible, and that the sea has a fluctuation may be witnessed by the oscillation of an anchored ship in the calmest day of summer.

By what means the tides are so regularly affected is at present only conjectured; possibly it may be by atmospheric pressure on the waters of the Great Deep, and perhaps even the Moon itself, as suggested by the late Dr. Rowbotham, may influence the atmosphere, increasing or diminishing its barometric pressure, and indirectly the rise and fall of the Earth in the waters.” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (259-260)

“The Moon presented a special math problem for the construction of the heliocentricity model. The only way to make the Moon fit in with the other assumptions was to reverse its direction from that of what everyone who has ever lived has seen it go. The math model couldn’t just stop the Moon like it did the Sun, that wouldn’t work. And it couldn’t let it continue to go East to West as we see it go, either at the same speed or at a different speed. The only option was to reverse its observed East to West direction and change its speed from about 64,000 miles an hour to about 2,200 miles an hour. This reversal, along with the change in speed, were unavoidable assumptions that needed to be adopted if the model was to have any chance of mimicking reality.” -Bernard Brauer

“They want you to believe that the Moon’s rotation is perfectly synchronized with its orbit so that’s why we only ever see one side of the Moon, rather than conclude the obvious – that the Moon is simply NOT rotating. Moreover, they had to slow down the Moon’s speed by 58,870 mph AND reverse its direction to West-East to successfully sell their phony heliocentricity system to a gullible public. I don’t think there is one person in many, many thousands – regardless of education – who knows that the Copernican Model had to turn the Moon’s observable direction around and give it a new speed to accommodate the phases and eclipses.” -Marshall Hall


Size Matters! Gravitational Tidal Change in Oceans but not in Lakes, Rivers and Ponds
Tides are caused by the gravitational pull of the moon and, to a lesser extent, the sun on bodies of water. The earth’s water bulges/moves toward and away from the moon(/sun), while it becomes shallower in areas perpendicular to the pull. Thus, there are two complete tide cycles per day.

Tides occur mainly in oceans because that is basically one huge body of water that is free to move all over the earth. Lakes and rivers do not cover enough area to have their water be moved significantly by gravity, or in other words, to have tides. (

~ So now size matters. Lake Erie, one of the largest lakes in the world, is said to have tidal change but “too small to be measured”


Earth’s gravity measured by NASA’s GRACE mission, showing deviations from the theoretical gravity of an idealized smooth Earth, the so-called earth ellipsoid. Red shows the areas where gravity is stronger than the smooth, standard value, and blue reveals areas where gravity is weaker. (Animated version.)[1]

~ Yet Earth’s rotation is so perfect that the atomic clock keeps time of spin down to a second error over 30 million years?


Since we postulate that gravity is a curvature of spacetime and that photons follow geodesics in spacetime, we find that “gravity bends light” (to be precise, it is the spacetime which is bent). The effect was experimentally verified in the famous 1919 eclipse expedition of Arthur Eddington. During a total eclipse of the Sun, the position of a star very near the Sun’s limb was measured. The star’s position was found to be shifted by an amount predicted by the general theory. This experiment played a big role in making Einstein the “scientific genius” and public figure that he was to become in the 20’s, 30′, and 40’s.(source)

Einstein’s Spacetime Curvature; What you See is not What Is, You See?

One of A.E’s biggest ‘theories” was that light bends by yielding to gravity yet the speed of light is always constant. This is impossible for if anything is to bend it must slow and then accelerate around the bend or arc.

Light is weightless and immaterial, yet not according to science, otherwise it would not be effected by gravity, since all things of mass are only effected by gravity.

The above mentioned experiment was erroneous, as are all experiments assuming parallax measurement, because it assumed that measuring the same object from two different points six months apart, would give us accurate distance.

The problem is the very fact that if light bends, how can the object being measured using light when it bends and curves and changes speeds??


Einstein’s Psuedo Science and Fictitious Forces

A person in a free-falling elevator experiences weightlessness and objects either float motionless or drift at constant speed. Since everything in the elevator is falling together, no gravitational effect can be observed.

An observer in an accelerated reference frame must introduce what physicists call fictitious forces to account for the acceleration experienced by himself and objects around him. Einstein’s master insight was that the constant, familiar pull of the Earth’s gravitational field is fundamentally the same as these fictitious forces.

A fictitious force, also called a pseudo force, d’Alembert force or inertial force, is an apparent force that acts on all masses whose motion is described using a non-inertial frame of reference, such as a rotating reference frame.

However, four fictitious forces are defined for frames accelerated in commonly occurring ways: one caused by any relative acceleration of the origin in a straight line (rectilinear acceleration), two involving rotation,—(centrifugal force and Coriolis force)—and a fourth, called the Euler force, caused by a variable rate of rotation, should that occur.

Following up on this insight, Einstein was able to formulate a theory with gravity as a fictitious force; attributing the apparent acceleration of gravity to the curvature of spacetime. This idea underlies Einstein’s theory of general relativity.

Pseudo; not actually but having the appearance of; pretended; false or spurious; sham

Fictitious; not real or true, being imaginary or having been fabricated.

~ So here we have ol’ A.E. telling all that to understand gravity one must delve into fiction and pseudo sceince, doesn’t get more plain vanilla than this.

Tagged: , , , ,

2 thoughts on “Is Sir Isaac Newton’s “Law of Gravity” Just One Great Big 500 Yr. Old Lie?

  1. Hello December 25, 2016 at 5:48 am Reply

    imagine you are in a car. If you were constantly accelerating, you would feel it. But after you stopped accelerating, you would have the energy of the car’s speed in you, and feel like you weren’t moving at all. If the Earth is rotating, (which I’m starting to disbelieve), we would already have been accustomed to the speed since before we existed. I’m just saying, if the Earth is rotating, we wouldn’t feel it in the first place.


    • jwlpeace December 25, 2016 at 5:23 pm Reply

      Imagine EArth is NOT a car,
      Imagine Earth has no metal exterior to shield wind
      IMagine Earth rotation is just a myth
      Imagine how long,
      and how well
      you and 7 billion others have been mind programmed
      Google: MK Ultra (German for Mind Kontrol)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: