- Start Here
- First Questions Asked?
- Jesuits; Rulers of Evil
- History of Geocentric Theory
- The Heliocentric Globalist Theory
- Reasons to Doubt the Earth is Truly a Sphere
- Reasons to Doubt Everything NASA
- Moon Hoax Images
- Moon Hoax Videos
- Trusted FE Links
- Other Author Websites
- The F.E.S.S. Forum
- Flat Earth Videos
- Flat Earth Library
- Quotes
- Flat Earth Gallery I
- Flat Earth Gallery II
- FE Memes I
- FE Memes II
- FE Music Vids
- New! FE Maps
- Flat Earth Book Now On Sale!
Aplanetruth.info 
We were taught the sun is a star. Is that untrue? We were taught the moon reflects the suns light. Is this untrue?
What is the sun, the moon? How does the moon have light?
It is like starting again.
LikeLike
The sun is not a star. It is THE sun, which is the only one of its kind. The moon is largely transparent and completely self-luminescent, shining with its own unique light. It does not reflect the sun’s light. We know this by the qualities of light that emanate from the moon, which are the exact opposite of the qualities of light emanating from the sun. A greater light to rule the day (sun) and a lesser light to rule the night (moon).
This is a good post on the subject to read: https://aplanetruth.info/2016/01/26/3033-why-is-moonlight-hotter-in-the-shade/
Here’s some info from the above link:
The Sun’s light is golden, warm, drying, preservative and antiseptic, while the Moon’s light is silver, cool, damp, putrefying and septic. The Sun’s rays decrease the combustion of a bonfire, while the Moon’s rays increase combustion. Plant and animal substances exposed to sunlight quickly dry, shrink, coagulate, and lose the tendency to decompose and putrify; grapes and other fruits become solid, partially candied and preserved like raisins, dates, and prunes; animal flesh coagulates, loses its volatile gaseous constituents, becomes firm, dry, and slow to decay. When exposed to moonlight, however, plant and animal substances tend to show symptoms of putrefaction and decay.
In direct sunlight a thermometer will read higher than another thermometer placed in the shade, but in full, direct moonlight a thermometer will read lower than another placed in the shade. If the Sun’s light is collected in a large lens and thrown to a focus point it can create significant heat, while the Moon’s light collected similarly creates no heat. In the “Lancet Medical Journal,” from March 14th, 1856, particulars are given of several experiments which proved the Moon’s rays when concentrated can actually reduce the temperature upon a thermometer more than eight degrees.
So sunlight and moonlight clearly have altogether different properties, and furthermore the Moon itself cannot physically be both a spherical body and a reflector of the Sun’s light! Reflectors must be flat or concave for light rays to have any angle of incidence; If a reflector’s surface is convex then every ray of light points in a direct line with the radius perpendicular to the surface resulting in no reflection.
On a clear night, during a waxing or waning cycle, it is even possible to occasionally see stars and planets directly through the surface of the Moon!
LikeLike
you forgot to give credit to Eric Dubay for the above information and thanx, i should of included this in the vid/doc.
LikeLike
Didn’t know the information came from Eric Dubay, although I’ve heard him cover this topic before multiple times. As I stated, the info came from your link: https://aplanetruth.info/2016/01/26/3033-why-is-moonlight-hotter-in-the-shade/
You might want to include in the above link that the written information comes from Eric Dubay. I now understand the video at the bottom is Eric’s and that’s where the written portion derives from, but to be clear, at the top of the article Eric should be credited.
LikeLike