Aether vs. Relativity; Proof of Einstein’s Grand Folly

fe einsteing fraud fake3

Airy’s Failure And The Sagnac’s Experiment

Airy’s “Failure” was that to observe a particular star he did NOT have to increase the tilt of his telescope when he filled it with water. This animation demonstrates what happens, proves that the Earth is stationary and therefore at the centre of the universe – as the Bible maintains.fe einstein dress

Sagnac’s experiment proved the existence of the aether, thus demolishing Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Complaints by two experienced physicists that when they were at university, they were never informed about this important experiment. When other experiments – Airy’s Failure, Michelson-Gale’s experiment (also not taught at universities!) and of course the famous Michelson-Morley experiment- a completely different picture of the cosmos emerges – with the Earth at the centre of the universe.

fe einstein plagaristSee Also:

How Did The Kings of Astronomy Get it So Wrong? Part II: Einstein and the Still Earth

Gerrard Hickson PORTRAIT OF THE AUTHOR, BY HIMSELF *** It will be remembered how Hipparchus failed to get an angle to the stars 2,000 years ago, and arrived at the conclusion that they must be infinitely distant; and we have seen how that hypothesis has been handed down to us through all the centuries without …

 

30 thoughts on “Aether vs. Relativity; Proof of Einstein’s Grand Folly

  1. rwederfoort May 2, 2016 at 4:53 pm Reply

    Reblogged this on ronaldwederfoort.

    Like

  2. hiroji kurihara October 4, 2018 at 12:48 am Reply

    Aether is Measurable

    On the moon’s surface, there is a passenger car. To the roof, waves of sun-light (plane waves) are coming horizontally. In the roof, there is a small hole. When the passenger car moves to the right (or to the left), a point of light projected on the floor will move.

    Moon’s motion (horizontal) will have an effect (on the point of light) also. The angle of light ray (in the passenger car) will not be 90 degrees.

    http://www.geocities.co.jp/Technopolis/2561/eng.html

    Sorry, I cannot receive E-mail. I do not have PC.

    Like

  3. Hiroji Kurihara March 20, 2019 at 9:42 am Reply

    Bradley found annual aberration on gamma star : Eltanin. In books, picture of ellipse is shown. However, this ellipse must be warped because of secular aberration (not only Eltanin). With this warp, the motion of solar system relative to arther must be clarified.

    Like

  4. Hiroji kurihara May 6, 2019 at 12:05 am Reply

    Time dilation

    A light source is shinning (frequency is constant). Two observers are receding from the light source at the same speed (in the opposite direction). Two observers receive the same frequency. Where is the time dilation ?

    Below is new URL of my web site. Yahoo’s service ends on Mar 2019.
    http://lifeafterdeath.vip/eng.html

    Like

  5. Hiroji kurihara May 27, 2019 at 3:24 am Reply

    Speed of light

    Plane waves of light (frequency is constant) are coming from the upper right 45 degrees. Two bars of the same length are moving to the right and the left at the same speed. In the formula lightspeed= frequency x wavelength, wavelength is the same (number of waves hitting the bar is the same) and the other two will not be the same.

    Like

  6. Hiroji kurihara June 16, 2019 at 11:24 pm Reply

    MM experiment

    For over a hundred years, we are suffering from a picture of MM experiment. Now, imagine to replace light with beams of particles (speed is constant). And it will be real behavior of light. Time and space will be absolute. All will be Galilean transformation.

    Like

  7. Hiroji Kurihara July 20, 2019 at 1:05 am Reply

    Constancy of speed of light

    They say, it stands up on an observer in every inertial frame. Yes, when the light source shines in that frame, it is true.

    Some man mistook this fact natural for a great discovery. And it is believed widely.

    Like

  8. Hiroji kurihara September 24, 2019 at 10:25 pm Reply

    Difference of motion

    Difference of inertial motion and accelerated motion will be difference of motion relative to aether frame. And accelerated motion and inertial force is front and back of a fact. Inertial force is not fictitious.

    Like

  9. Hiroji kurihara September 24, 2019 at 10:32 pm Reply

    Falling of non free

    Imagine elevator cabins are falling in various density of air. Hydrodynamics tell motions of these elevators. Equivalence principle is invalid.

    Like

  10. Hiroji kurihara September 24, 2019 at 10:49 pm Reply

    Speed of light

    To an observer floating in outer space, speed of a star is depending on the position of the star on the celestial sphere. And when the sourse is not distant, speed of light is depending on the motion of the source (according to the emission theory). In addition, motin of an observer.

    Like

  11. Hiroji kurihara September 25, 2019 at 5:41 am Reply

    Free fall

    There are inumerable vectors of inertial force and gravity everywhere. On an elevator cabin,
    why they are making a big fuss ?

    Like

  12. Hiroji kurihara September 29, 2019 at 12:57 am Reply

    Accelerated motion
    Accelerated motion will be the motion relative to aether frame. Vector causes the same vector of inertial force. Gravity has no connection.

    From every inertial frame, accelerated motion is possible to know qualitatively and quantitatively.

    Like

  13. Hiroji kurihara September 29, 2019 at 1:05 am Reply

    Emission theory
    If there is no frame in space, light must follow the emission theory (but for a few seconds).

    Like

  14. Hiroji kurihara September 29, 2019 at 1:12 am Reply

    Space and time
    Our motion will not affect on space and time. Our motion is various and space time is one and only. Every relative speed will follow Gallirean transformation. Including light.

    Like

  15. Hiroji kurihara September 29, 2019 at 1:24 am Reply

    Lorentz contraction
    Plane waves of light (wavelength is constant) are coming from the upper right 45 degrees. Number of waves hitting the both ends of the horizontal bar is the same. To an observer moving horizontally also.

    Like

  16. Hiroji kurihara October 31, 2019 at 9:29 pm Reply

    Inertial force is depending on m. So, it is not fictitious.

    Like

    • FactYouAll November 1, 2019 at 1:58 am Reply

      Words, words, words. None of them are evidence of anything. How silly.
      Thx.

      Like

  17. Hiroji kurihara November 2, 2019 at 6:00 am Reply

    Constancy of speed of light
    In an area where propagation of light follows the emission theory, it is constant relative to the light source. In an area where propagation of light follows aether, it is constant relative to aether. So, it cannot be constant relative to moving observers.

    Like

  18. Hiroji kurihara November 3, 2019 at 12:57 am Reply

    A web site on anti relativity

    A site above written by member voluntees of Japan science council is now being published ( in Japanese). Below is URL.
    http://reriron.kage-tora.com

    Like

  19. Hiroji kurihara November 4, 2019 at 5:16 am Reply

    Basis of special relativity
    We seem to measure c only by the light source situated on the same inertial frame. A web site says, reasonable basis of constancy of c cannot be found in web (with three words).

    Like

  20. Hiroji kurihara November 8, 2019 at 6:18 am Reply

    Constancy of c is nonsense (I say again)

    1) There seems not to be reliable basis of constant c.
    2) It is easy to disprove constancy of c. And many easy ways are possible.

    Like

  21. Hiroji kurihara November 13, 2019 at 5:13 am Reply

    Inertial force

    On a slope (no friction), a body is sliding down. Action of gravity is mg. Then, how about the reaction ? It is resolved to two vectors. Inertial force is not fictitious.

    Like

  22. Hiroji kurihara November 13, 2019 at 11:05 pm Reply

    Equivalence principle is nonsense (I say again)

    An elevator in free fall is explained fully by Newton. No different explanation is possible. And it is the same even if limited to the infinite small area.

    Like

  23. Hiroji kurihara November 15, 2019 at 8:50 pm Reply

    Reexamination of propagation of light (I say again)

    In outer space, a mirror is reflecting a star light ray. Speed of reflected light relative to the mirror is constant. Speed of incident light relative to the mirror is not constant (the latter is constant relative to the aether).

    Like

  24. Hiroji kurihara November 17, 2019 at 1:03 am Reply

    Inertial force is not fictitious

    On a plane, there are two bodies. One is at a standstill, the other is accelerating. Acceleration (a) and inertial force (ma) both are not fictitious.

    There are two disks. One is not rotating, the other is rotating. Acceleration and inertial force both are not fictitious.

    Like

  25. Hiroji kurihara November 20, 2019 at 1:29 am Reply

    Acceleration

    From nothing, “a” seems not to emerge. By acceleration of body relative to aether, “ma” will emerge. Qualitatively and quantitatively.

    Like

  26. Hiroji kurihara November 20, 2019 at 1:36 am Reply

    Light is propagated in two ways

    Propagation follows the emission theory is propagated in vaccum space and propagation follows aether is propagated in aether space. A mirror in outer space that is reflecting star light ray shows above.

    Like

  27. Hiroji kurihara November 22, 2019 at 12:48 am Reply

    Acceleration (I say again)

    On a plane, a straight line is drawn. On this line, two bodies are receding. One is at a standstill, the other is accelerated uniformly. On the one, inertial force is emerging but not on the other. All is shown by a and ma.

    But what distinguishes acceleration and nonacceleration ? In the above picture, uniform isotropic aether will be hidden. This picture is not picture of geometry.

    Like

  28. Hiroji kurihara November 23, 2019 at 11:35 pm Reply

    Space is rest frame

    Into space, let us draw plural vectors of acceleration a. Space willt be rest frame.

    Like

  29. Hiroji kurihara December 8, 2019 at 1:06 am Reply

    Eruptions

    Are there still berievers of relativity? Eruptions. It is not a thing of this world.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: