Destroying the Programmed Parrots of Newtons’ 3rd Law of Gravity

Folks, Every-thing, I mean EVERYTHING about heliocentric theory, hinges upon Newtonian gravity “proof”, yet the premise in itself is absurd and ridiculous for anyone with a clear mind to think for themselves.

This has been ingrained in every school child since the early 1900’s with the exact same one-off example shown below that has been proven no where but in space..

….and according to ONLY ONE source NASA…

….which was started in 1958 by a Freemason and rocket builder from NAZI Germany!

NASA is a Government Military Operation

Programming this “theory” of Gravity to the Masses since public schooling began

Everyone was taught the exact same thing for the past 100 years using the same exact mind thought or physical demonstration, yet NO ONE questions the “scientific” method used.

A string tied to a bucket of water to prove centrifugal, not centripedal forces swung in a center point.

False Premise: Water is on the inside of Earth

Earth is not attached by string to another object

Water should be on outside of bucket if wanting to replicate Earth NOT inside!

Water should be heaviest out outermost extremes, yet is not in experiment. In fact, when one goes deep sea diving, the pressure is GREATER than at surface!

And every school child is taught the exact same line of b.s. since the early 1920’s.

*****

Gravity is NOT even included in Newtons’ Law of Gravity definition!!!

The name is derived from the Latin word “ gravis,” which means “ heavy,” “ having weight,” while the Law of Gravitation is defined as “ That mutual action between masses of matter by virtue of which every such mass tends toward every other with a force varying directly as the product of the masses, and inversely as the square of their distances apart.”

Empirical Research:
A way of gaining knowledge by means of direct and indirect observation or experience.  Much of Newton’s evidence was collected by observations,directly and indirectly, then with logical reasoning, he made informed decisions….

****

Did you know Newton’s body of work was edited heavily by the Jesuits?

Sir Isaac Newton’s Big Lie Mistake

Reduced to simplicity, gravitation is said to be “ That which attracts every thing toward every other thing.” That does not tell us much ; and yet the little it does tell us is not true ; for a thoughtful observer knows very well that everything is not attracted towards every other thing. . . The definition implies that it is a force ; but it does not say so, for that phrase “ mutual action ” is ambiguous, and not at all convincing.

The Encyclopaedia Britannica tells us that “ The Law of Gravitation is unique among the laws of nature, not only for its wide generality, taking the whole universe into its scope, but in the fact that, so far as is yet known, it is absolutely unmodified by any condition or cause whatever.”

There is not anything or force in the universe that is absolute! No thing that goes its own way and does what it will without regard to other forces or things. The thing is impossible; and it is not true; wherefore it has fallen to me to show where the inconsistency in it lies.

The name given to this mutual action means “ weight,” and weight is one of the attributes of all matter. Merely to say that anything is matter or material implies that it has weight, while to speak of weight implies matter. Matter and weight are inseparable, they are not laws, but elemental facts. They exist.

But it has been suggested that gravitation is a force, indeed we often hear it referred to as the force of gravitation ; but force is quite a different thing than weight, it is active energy expressed by certain conditions and combinations of matter. It acts.

****

Newton‘s supposed “law of gravity,” are what’s truly dubious. Heliocentrists cannot show us a single object massive enough that by virtue of its mass alone, causes other smaller masses to stick to or orbit it as they claim happens with the Sun, Moon, Earth, Stars and Planets. If you cannot give me a single practical example of “gravity” smaller than the Earth or the Sun, then it is merely heresay, not science!  ~ Eric Dubay   Flat Earth Conspiracy

Newton’s Major Body of Work Heavily Edited by Jesuits

“Newton’s Laws have been responsible for the discovery of planets, for the construction of safe bridges, roads and amusement park rides, for an understanding of the ocean’s tides, and for realistic computer animations and video games,” said Erlich, the Class of 2017 Associate Professor of Physics. “It would be difficult to overstate the importance of at least some of these things.”

After the first edition (hereafter referred to as Newton 1), two subsequent editions were published. The second edition (Newton 2) was published in 1713 and the third edition (Newton 3) in 1726. Then, just over a decade later, comes Newton 4, the so-called Jesuit edition, which was edited by two Minim friars. The Jesuit edition contains commentary that extends to roughly the same length as Newton’s text. The text for the Jesuit edition was, in fact, taken from the Newton 3 edition of the Principia—the last edition to be edited by Newton himself.(Source)

****

Newton Did Not discover Calculus but Passed on by Jesuits

Dr George Gheverghese Joseph from The University of Manchester says the ‘Kerala School’ identified the ‘infinite series’- one of the basic components of calculus – in about 1350.
The discovery is currently – and wrongly – attributed in books to Sir Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibnitz at the end of the seventeenth centuries.

And there is strong circumstantial evidence that the Indians passed on their discoveries to mathematically knowledgeable Jesuit missionaries who visited India during the fifteenth century.   (source)

***

See Related:

5 thoughts on “Destroying the Programmed Parrots of Newtons’ 3rd Law of Gravity”

1. Bobby January 31, 2016 at 9:07 am Reply

We haven’t advanced since Newton…. that is a terrible fact.
If we put two leaves on a pond, they will attract each other, this; so far as I am aware; is known as capillary attraction.
I have always wondered where the gravity of earth ends and the vacuum of space begins…. I am sure the earth is not a sphere, simply because they say it is, and they lie.
The picture that we have been fed called earthrise was; I believe; a moonrise airbrushed, as the earth should have been far larger.
Great site btw, thank you. B

Like

2. MIke March 12, 2017 at 3:34 pm Reply

This article is so full of errors as to be hard to believe! “Newton’s (not Newtons’) third law of gravity” doesn’t exist! Is it meant to be Newton’s third law of motion, or Newton’s law of gravity? They AREN’T the same!

Anyone who uses the swinging pail to demonstrate GRAVITY would be a fool. What it does show is the effect of Newton’s FIRST law of motion (objects remain stationary or in constant motion unless acted upon by a force) in acting AGAINST gravity.

Then we read, “The name given to this mutual action means “ weight,” and weight is one of the attributes of all matter.” The author is confusing WEIGHT and MASS. Mass is an attribute of matter, weight is not. Weight is the force on an object of mass due to gravity: to speak of weight WITHOUT gravity is scientifically meaningless.

“But it has been suggested that gravitation is a force, indeed we often hear it referred to as the force of gravitation ; but force is quite a different thing than weight, it is active energy expressed by certain conditions and combinations of matter. It acts.” Once again this shows ignorance of the weight/mass distinction. It also gives a definition of force, “it is active energy expressed by certain conditions and combinations of matter. It acts.”, which be a fail in 8th grade science!

Finally, we see why Eric Dubay should stick to yoga! He asserts that gravity has not been detected caused by objects smaller than the Earth, which is news for all of those who have measured the value of the gravitational constant since Henry Cavendish in the late 19th century.

Like

• jwlpeace March 12, 2017 at 4:37 pm Reply

this coming from a guy at ‘fakemail’. hmmm
Why doesn’t Newton theory ever use the word “weight”
Gravity means “weight’ in etymology.
Too simple for the complicated fakemail to understand the grandness of the great hoax?

Liked by 1 person

• MIke March 12, 2017 at 5:24 pm

jwlpeace – why should I give you my real email, when you are quite prepared to publish it on the site?

I am talking about the scientific use of the words: anything else is irrelevant when we are discussing the science of gravity.

Like

• Tom March 12, 2017 at 5:59 pm

jwlpeace –

RE: Gravity means “weight’ in etymology.

OK; so what does weight mean, what causes it, and how can it be measured?

Like

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.