What are the odds? Also there are 33 Masonic sections in the UN Logo/Flag. Again what are the odds that there are also 33 degrees in Scottish-rite Freemasonry with its HQ located centrally in Washington D.C.?
- Start Here
- First Questions Asked?
- Jesuits; Rulers of Evil
- History of Geocentric Theory
- The Heliocentric Globalist Theory
- Reasons to Doubt the Earth is Truly a Sphere
- Reasons to Doubt Everything NASA
- Moon Hoax Images
- Moon Hoax Videos
- Trusted FE Links
- Other Author Websites
- The F.E.S.S. Forum
- Flat Earth Videos
- Flat Earth Library
- Quotes
- Flat Earth Gallery I
- Flat Earth Gallery II
- FE Memes I
- FE Memes II
- FE Music Vids
- New! FE Maps
- Flat Earth Book Now On Sale!
Aplanetruth.info 
nice
LikeLike
Yes, it is a coincidence they both use the same projection.
Any claim beyond that needs an evidence-based explanation put forth, to be considered,
LikeLike
Your argument doesn’t make sense, the flat earth model predates the UN by hundreds of years, y would they knowingly use that as their logo? Coincidence would be them not knowing of each others logo, it’s a blatant case of putting the truth in plain sight only for those who know what to look for
LikeLike
The Gleason map (the same as the UN logo map) has been debunked. There are numerous flights that operate in the Southern Hemisphere with timings that would be impossible on the Gleason map. For example, Sydney to Santiago in 14 hours and Johannesburg to Sao Paulo in 8.5 hours.
I’ve seen attempts to debunk the debunking, but they all rely on magic like “oh, the planes speed up to 2000mph when they are not on shore-based radar.” in order for that sort of thing to be true, you would have to prove that a commercial airliner can go that fast. It seems people just make stuff up when their ‘facts’ don’t match reality.
btw, the if the UN wanted a world map for their logo, they would have to have chosen from among the many projections available since it would be impossible to have a globe for a logo (globes are 3d, logos are 2d). So that means ANY logo they would have used would not be an accurate depiction of the earth.
(I am coming to the conclusion that the globe earth model is the correct one. I have been studying FE for weeks now and have yet to find anything that supports it. Kinda sad.)
LikeLike
Mathew,
I don’t know why, and neither do you (so you provided a guess).
As I said, if you think your idea has merit, find the evidence that can be verified and present it to the public for scrutiny.
Truth doesn’t belong to one person or a group of individuals. It is based on the merit of what backs up an assertion. Don’t believe me, go find out for yourself.
LikeLike
I’m sure glad I came across this website….Let the fun begin you “Globe Ball Roundheads”…….Wake up people cos we’ve been lied to for hundreds of years.
I’ve done experiments, looked into it and what you see is what you get……ITS FLAT.
LikeLike
Why?
LikeLike