Stars Through a Translucent Moon You Can See For Yourself

(~Ed, this video was taken down because an amateur astronomer, using a 17X magnification lens, was showing how the stars were very clearly visible through the dark, transparent side of a half moon.  Anyone can do this for themselves and post online.)

Further DIY proof that the moon is translucent and likely generates and emanates its own light source.  This is irrefutable and clearly shows the lies of 500 years we’ve been told sold.

Here is  another video of stars through the Moon (start at 3:05)

“On the 15th of March, 1848, when the moon was seven and a half days old, I never saw her unillumined disc so beautifully. . . . On my first looking into the telescope a star of about the 7th magnitude was some minutes of a degree distant from the moon’s dark limb. I saw that its occultation by the moon was inevitable. . . . The star, instead of disappearing the moment the moon’s edge came in contact with it, apparently glided on the moon’s dark face, as if it had been seen through a transparent moon; or, as if a star were between me and the moon. . . .

p. 339

[paragraph continues] I have seen a similar apparent projection several times. . . . The cause of this phenomenon is involved in impenetrable mystery.” 1

In the “Philosophical Transactions” for 1794 it is stated:–

Three persons in Norwich, and one in London, saw a star on the evening of March 7th, 1794, in the dark part of the moon, which had not then attained the first quadrature; and from the representations which are given the star must have appeared very far advanced upon the disc. On the same evening there was an occultation of Aldebaran, which Dr. Maskelyne thought a singular coincidence, but which would now be acknowledged as the cause of the phenomenon.” 2

On March 7th, 1794, four astronomers (3 in Norwich, 1 in London) wrote in “The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Astronomical Society” that they “saw a star in the dark part of the moon, which had not then attained the first quadrature; and from the representations which are given the star must have appeared very far advanced upon the disc.” Sir James South of the Royal Observatory in Kensington wrote in a letter to the Times newspaper April 7, 1848, that, “On the 15th of March, 1848, when the moon was seven and a half days old, I never saw her unillumined disc so beautifully. On my first looking into the telescope a star of about the 7th magnitude was some minutes of a degree distant from the moon’s dark limb. I saw that its occultation by the moon was inevitable … The star, instead of disappearing the moment the moon’s edge came in contact with it, apparently glided on the moon’s dark face, as if it had been seen through a transparent moon; or, as if a star were between me and the moon … I have seen a similar apparent projection several times … The cause of this phenomenon is involved in impenetrable mystery.” In the monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society for June 8, 1860, Thomas Gaunt stated that the “Occultation of Jupiter by the moon, on the 24th of May, 1860, was seen with an achromatic of 3.3 inches aperture, 50 inches focus; the immersion with a power of 50, and the emersion with a power of 70. At the immersion I could not see the dark limb of the moon until the planet appeared to touch it, and then only to the extent of the diameter of the planet; but what I was most struck with was the appearance on the moon as it passed over the planet. It appeared as though the planet was a dark object, and glided on to the moon instead of behind it; and the appearance continued until the planet was hid, when I suddenly lost the dark limb of the moon altogether.” I have personally also seen stars through the edge of the waxing/waning Moon. It actually happens fairly often; if you are diligent and specifically observing for the phenomenon on starry nights you can occasionally see it even with the naked eye.

“During a partial solar eclipse the sun’s outline has many times been seen through the body of the moon. But those who have been taught to believe that the moon is a solid opaque sphere, are ever ready with ‘explanations,’ often of the most inconsistent character, rather than acknowledge the simple fact of semi-transparency. Not only has this been proved by the visibility of the sun’s outline through segments, and sometimes the very centre of the moon, but often, at new moon, the outline of the whole, and even the several shades of light on the opposite and illuminated part have been distinctly seen. In other words we are often able to see through the dark side of the moon’s body to light on the other side.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (337)

“That the moon is not a perfectly opaque body, but a crystallized substance, is shown from the fact that when a few hours old or even at quarter we can through the unilluminated portion see the light shining on the other side. Stars have also been observed through her surface!” -J. Atkinson, “Earth Review Magazine”

A Star occulting a crescent Moon has long been a popular symbol of Islam, was the symbol of the Ottoman Empire, it is found on the flags of Algeria, Azerbaijan, Libya, Malaysia, Mauritania, Pakistan, Singapore, Tunisia, Turkey, and in the Coat of Arms of countries from Croatia, to Germany, Ireland, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden, Ukraine and the United Kingdom. Its origins can be traced back thousands of years to ancient Hindu culture where it is found in the symbol for the word “Om,” the primary name for the almighty, representing the union of god Shiva and goddess Shakti. Why the symbol has carried such widespread historical significance is open to interpretation, but regardless of interpretation, the image of star(s) occulting the Moon has long been a prevalent and meaningful picture.


That stars and planets have been seen through the Moon is a fact, but to this day NASA, modern astronomy and a world full of brainwashed heliocentrists maintain that the Moon is a spherical, Earth-like habitation capable of landing spaceships on. They claim the Moon (and Mars for that matter!) are habitable desert planets, much like Star Wars’ Tatooine, Dune’s Arrakis and other such imaginary science-fiction worlds. Since long before the staged Apollo “Moon landings” these Masonic Sun-worshipping heliocentrists have been claiming the Moon to be a solid planetoid complete with plains, plateaus, mountains, valleys and craters though nothing of the sort can be discerned even using the best telescopes.

“Astronomers have indulged in imagination to such a degree that the moon is now considered to be a solid, opaque spherical world, having mountains, valleys, lakes, or seas, volcanic craters, and other conditions analogous to the surface of the earth. So far has this fancy been carried that the whole visible disc has been mapped out, and special names given to its various peculiarities, as though they had been carefully observed, and actually measured by a party of terrestrial ordinance surveyors. All this has been done in direct opposition to the fact that whoever, for the first time, and without previous bias of mind, looks at the moon’s surface through a powerful telescope, is puzzled to say what it is really like, or how to compare it with anything known to him. The comparison which may be made will depend upon the state of mind of the observer. It is well known that persons looking at the rough bark of a tree, or at the irregular lines or veins in certain kinds of marble and stone, or gazing at the red embers in a dull fire will, according to the degree of activity of the imagination, be able to see many different forms, even the outlines of animals and of human faces. It is in this way that persons may fancy that the moon’s surface is broken up into hills and valleys, and other conditions such as are found on earth. But that anything really similar to the surface of our own world is anywhere visible upon the moon is altogether fallacious.” -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, “Zetetic Astronomy, Earth Not a Globe!” (335)

The reality is, however, that the Moon is not a solid body, it is clearly circular, but not spherical, and not in any way an Earth-like planetoid which humans could set foot on. In fact, the Moon is largely transparent and completely self-luminescent, shining with its own unique light.

The Sun’s light is golden, warm, drying, preservative and antiseptic, while the Moon’s light is silver, cool, damp, putrefying and septic. The Sun’s rays decrease the combustion of a bonfire, while the Moon’s rays increase combustion. Plant and animal substances exposed to sunlight quickly dry, shrink, coagulate, and lose the tendency to decompose and putrify; grapes and other fruits become solid, partially candied and preserved like raisins, dates, and prunes; animal flesh coagulates, loses its volatile gaseous constituents, becomes firm, dry, and slow to decay. When exposed to moonlight, however, plant and animal substances tend to show symptoms of putrefaction and decay.

In direct sunlight a thermometer will read higher than another thermometer placed in the shade, but in full, direct moonlight a thermometer will read lower than another placed in the shade. If the Sun’s light is collected in a large lens and thrown to a focus point it can create significant heat, while the Moon’s light collected similarly creates no heat. In the “Lancet Medical Journal,” from March 14th, 1856, particulars are given of several experiments which proved the Moon’s rays when concentrated can actually reduce the temperature upon a thermometer more than eight degrees.

So sunlight and moonlight clearly have altogether different properties, and furthermore the Moon itself cannot physically be both a spherical body and a reflector of the Sun’s light! Reflectors must be flat or concave for light rays to have any angle of incidence; If a reflector’s surface is convex then every ray of light points in a direct line with the radius perpendicular to the surface resulting in no reflection.

On a clear night, during a waxing or waning cycle, it is even possible to occasionally see stars and planets directly through the surface of the Moon!

“That the moon is not a perfectly opaque body, but a crystallized substance, is shown from the fact that when a few hours old or even at quarter we can through the unilluminated portion see the light shining on the other side. Stars have also been observed through her surface!” -J. Atkinson, “Earth Review Magazine”

A Star occulting a crescent Moon has long been a popular symbol of Islam, was the symbol of the Ottoman Empire, it is found on the flags of Algeria, Azerbaijan, Libya, Malaysia, Mauritania, Pakistan, Singapore, Tunisia, Turkey, and in the Coat of Arms of countries from Croatia, to Germany, Ireland, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden, Ukraine and the United Kingdom. Its origins can be traced back thousands of years to ancient Hindu culture where it is found in the symbol for the word “Om,” the primary name for the almighty, representing the union of god Shiva and goddess Shakti. Why the symbol has carried such widespread historical significance is open to interpretation, but regardless of interpretation, the image of star(s) occulting the Moon has long been a prevalent and meaningful picture.

That stars and planets have been seen through the Moon is a fact, but to this day NASA, modern astronomy and a world full of brainwashed heliocentrists maintain that the Moon is a spherical, Earth-like habitation capable of landing spaceships on. They claim the Moon (and Mars for that matter!) are habitable desert planets, much like Star Wars’ Tatooine, Dune’s Arrakis and other such imaginary science-fiction worlds. Since long before the staged Apollo “Moon landings” these Masonic Sun-worshipping heliocentrists have been claiming the Moon to be a solid planetoid complete with plains, plateaus, mountains, valleys and craters though nothing of the sort can be discerned even using the best telescopes.

20 thoughts on “Stars Through a Translucent Moon You Can See For Yourself

  1. gustavsaure October 23, 2015 at 2:10 am Reply

    I saved that video before it got deleted. Here’s a link.
    https://mega.nz/#!cxQ0GBzD

    Like

  2. jwlpeace October 23, 2015 at 3:08 am Reply

    thanx for doing that. i cannot open the encryption to view. can you help

    Like

  3. gustavsaure October 23, 2015 at 3:58 am Reply

    Sorry bout that here’s the decryption key:
    !IYB2Yo04ToEVwLVvsFrVbQmisfy7-Xa2i9tNjCWeG50

    Like

  4. gustavsaure October 23, 2015 at 4:02 am Reply
  5. David V June 24, 2016 at 8:28 am Reply

    Thank you for posting that MEGA link, got to see the video because of it.

    Like

  6. Nun ya July 17, 2016 at 11:23 pm Reply

    I guarantee the video of moon with stars is fake as hell double exposure or CGI I USE my 114mm telescope all the time to look at different phases of the moon as well as stars planets and nebula and galaxy’s and never not once have I seen stars or planets through the moon.

    Like

    • Kzk1982 February 22, 2017 at 6:14 pm Reply

      Poor poor nunya. Gees, those freemason illuminatis have really washed that silly mind of yours. But then again your reality may be completely different to the norm. Or funnily enough you may of been past out from your own black stars.lol!

      Like

  7. Joe Cheevers August 31, 2016 at 1:43 pm Reply

    What is your guarantee. I also have proof. At asa 6400 with a 300mm telephoto at 1/60 exp I have seen them too.

    Like

  8. Liam Paterson October 24, 2016 at 4:54 am Reply

    whats to say the stars are between the earth and moon and not behind it?
    .

    Like

    • Kzk1982 February 22, 2017 at 6:07 pm Reply

      That’s totally an ignorant statement you made. If you had at least 15 minutes you could clearly see the moon travels past these stars that you think are localised.No crime for innovation though!

      Like

  9. ムハマド・アリ (@ultraali453) October 26, 2016 at 2:40 pm Reply

    I saw it too. I forgot about it in the morning but I remember it to this day. My friend pointed it out to me while I was telling him about the billions of stars, etc. I kept staring at it, knowing that the point of light would move With The Moon, but it actually moved independently of the Moon until it was out of the Moon’s circle. I didn’t know how to explain it to my friend..

    Like

  10. matchewg January 1, 2017 at 4:30 am Reply

    Sir, stars are massive balls of gas, having one that close to us would not only rearrange our entire solar system, but destroy the earth as well.

    Like

    • Seeker February 8, 2017 at 2:17 pm Reply

      Or are they?

      Like

      • matchewg March 7, 2017 at 4:51 pm

        Think logically please.

        Like

    • Jumpjet April 19, 2017 at 7:06 pm Reply

      Its ur freedom to believe that star is massive ball of gas and the solar system… but I not believe what science modern told about this universe… Search FLat Earth.. Theres no gravity

      Like

      • matchewg April 20, 2017 at 6:40 pm

        I do not “believe,” this is science, it is fact. You believe in illogical fantasies that the major majority of the world will laugh at.

        Like

  11. Astronomer Al March 3, 2017 at 10:23 am Reply

    Someone tell me this is a joke.
    If it’s not: We’re doomed.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Asecol April 10, 2017 at 4:49 am Reply

    So we are supposed to believe this with one photo and yet also believe all the many many photos and videos of the earth, the moon, and other planets are fake?

    Like

  13. David October 10, 2017 at 9:08 am Reply

    No matter where you are on earth, a full moon is ALWAYS circular. Only a sphere will look round from all vantage points. If the moon was a disc, we all wouldn’t see a circular full moon. It’s that simple!

    Liked by 1 person

  14. Rick Heishman December 13, 2017 at 10:33 pm Reply

    I have seen stars through the moon, the best example was the eclipse on 9/27/2015/ time 9:17:54 central Iowa time I used a tripod and a 100 mm lens. Later I checked the pictures I had uploaded to my computer and found these stars to be seen though the moon upon zooming in. You can say it is dust particles or whatever but I have closely examined them and hmmmm. Also I have tested that the shade of the MOON and it is warmer than direct moonlight??? I am a flat earther geocentric believer. I have taken pictures from 1 foot above the ground or see level (on a beach in Florida) with massive zoom lens and saw ships and islands 40 to 60 miles out over the ocean and not just the top but the bottom. Let’s face it the ocean has to curve. Use your own brain to look at your surroundings and keep an open mind. I don’t want to insult anyone but the globe has been slammed down our throats for about 500 years, give or take. Look at a calm lake or pond early in the morning with no wind you can see the reflection of the other side of the water. It is beautiful. N.A.S.A. says we have 4 to 5 different blistering speeds going on with the earth and its travel around the sun as well as our milky way galaxy speed and don’t forget universe speed and another one I’m confused wouldn’t you think these speeds would cause some kind of a ripple or ever some slight vibration on the dead calm water. Water weighs 8.36 lbs. per gallon cold, can you imagine the weight of all the water in the ocean and GRAVITY?????? holds it in while a bird fly’s over the water and isn’t sucked down. You can rant and rave all you want and would never convince me of a globe earth. God in the bible makes many references to the earth being stationary and in Joshua the sun and moon are commanded to stop or stand still over Gibeon and the valley of Aijalon. for almost 24 hours in Joshua 10:12. Look it up. If you don’t believe in God take a look at the Golden Ratio on your computer. Google (1.168). It will eventually say that the earth was designed by a SEVERE MATHEMATICIAN not pure chance.. Also watch the sun during the day it does not travel on a strait line as some would say. It travels on a curve. Which also makes me wonder how the sun can rise and set well north of 90 degrees east and 270 degrees west in the middle of the summer in the United States Midwest area. I have held a globe and taped a string to Iowa and taped to a light source 60 watt bulb with the help of a friend, holding the globe at the closest angle we both agreed on and the sun looking down the strait string the bulb sun was setting SOUTH of Iowa as should be, try this your self. The sun never comes any further north than the tropic of cancer which is a little south of the tip of Florida. It’s curving on its circuit. Thanks for letting put in my 2 cents worth. They are telling me I have to leave the computer room and head back to my room and take my medication now… LOL Love you all keep an open minds thanks.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: