Matthew Boylan worked as a 1099 contractor to NASA and was “invited” into the Heliocentric Conspiracy to further his work with NASA creating “space realism” drawings so that NASA could perpetuate the Great Lie.
He says he decided not to descend into their world of deception and began speaking out when he was no longer hired by NASA and feared for his life. Here he explains much of his work and also, his ideas of a Flat, plane round Earth.
Very interesting that this was published by the NASA channel!
(this presentation by Mr. Boylan is fairly irritating in style but he is the only connection publicly linking NASA with creating fake and false images and photographs.)
Tagged: flat earth, matthew boylan, NASA
I struggled to watch this, don’t understand his angle. This guy does not sound credible, Is that why NASA channel has shared this?
here is an intro to why he is speaking out and background. He is not the most articulate and delivery is awkward.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am very sympathetic to the possibility of a Flat Earth. I’ve purchased 3 books on the subject and have downloaded a number of additional titles on Flat Earth & Geocentrism.
But this guy just strikes me as completely full of himself. His tone is unnecessarily harsh (to speak to the camera/audience while talking harshly & dismissively with content actually addressed to the conspirators he hates is to project venom towards an otherwise neutral audience – an extremely poor and self-indulgent communications technique) and he comes across as if he is attempting to impersonate James Dean (or someone of that ilk). The one shorter video where he is mostly being interviewed sitting on his sofa is tolerable and mostly informative – but these two videos seem dreadful to me – especially since Flat Earth could really use some emotionally & scholastically mature front-men who are capable of extended reasonable (and calm) discourse, without histrionics, posturing, or constant veering into name-calling and hyper-vigilant trigger-fingered paranoia.
I have enjoyed most of the articles on this site, and look forward to more. But, in a desire to help break someone into the proposition of a Flat Earth, these two videos are exactly what I would hope such a person would never discover – until such a time as they were “well-grounded” enough to be able to process them without falling away due to the assumption that this guy (Matthew Boylan) is somehow representative of the maturity level of the typical Flat Earth proponent.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good pts. and i agree, Mr. Boylan, if authentic, is the only “source” that connects the CGI world of NASA to the Great Hoax. if readers get turned off by his abrasive style from learning about an alternative world narrative, then that is up to them. He must be under a lot of pressure if he is taking on NASA mano on mano.
There is so much common sense evidence already from those who went before us as well as guys like Mr. Dubay, and we need to archive what we have..the good the bad and the ugly. and let the truth be found by those who can look through the rhetoric and noise… IMHO.
“Mr. Boylan, if authentic, is the only “source” that connects the CGI world of NASA to the Great Hoax.”
Yes, he occupies a sort of ‘whistleblower niche’ as the only ex-NASA-artist (although there have been numerous photography experts who have deconstructed supposed NASA photos over the years, as you know). But he runs with it like someone who is handed fame before they are truly prepared to utilize it in a more or less optimal way (that could be the greatest blessing to all concerned).
Yes, ‘he is what he is’, ‘you take what you get’ & ‘beggars can’t be choosers’ – but, possible personal pressures notwithstanding, by constantly succumbing to the temptation to talk down to his audience he inadvertently raises the question of his own intelligence.
“If readers get turned off by his abrasive style from learning about an alternative world narrative, then that is up to them.”
I have done a lot of research over the years and I cannot count the times I have been willing to overlook aspects of the presenter which, initially at least, turned me off. Someone could be, in my opinion, very wrong about some things but possibly very right about something I intuited was worthy of further investigation. A seasoned researcher will be willing to wade through a lot of dirt for the few nuggets of gold… …until such a time as the degree of diminishing returns leaves the prospector to feel that they are essentially now just wallowing in dirt and that the bulk of recoverable gold has long since been harvested.
Yes, people are essentially responsible for their own reactions and, if they haven’t the ability to follow Providential direction through a stretch of swamp-land now and then, then they may not have what it takes to navigate through this challenging terrain.
But, as I mentioned earlier, I (personally) would not want a newbie to encounter those two longer videos until they had previously been exposed to saner presentations because there is no valid reason to put “stumbling stones” before explorers who are not yet up to speed, so to speak, claiming it is simply their problem if they are put off by it.
“There is so much common sense evidence already from those who went before us as well as guys like Mr. Dubay, and we need to archive what we have… the good the bad and the ugly. and let the truth be found by those who can look through the rhetoric and noise… IMHO.”
Yes, I agree with you regarding the importance of archiving all that is available – the good, the bad & the ugly. And it is up to the (capacity & drive of) the individual to process it all as best he can. Really, I don’t consider us to be in any sort of tangible disagreement – I’m just responding to your reply as a matter of balance and elaboration of my perspective, but not with the intent of magnifying differences or escalating an interchange into a debate (which I don’t see you as doing either :-).
And I should mention that I have produced no videos, have no website, and have written no articles. I’ve been investigating Flat Earth for just two weeks now, however, I’m not sure I’ll ever be qualified to submit more than a comment here or there on a forum or blog. Between the two of us, you are the one who has been giving his time, attention and effort to put together a publically accessible collection of articles relevant to Flat Earth & Geocentricity, whereas I’m just more or less puttering about on my own.
thanx for the comments. I too only started doing serious research on this amazing subject last December. I keep asking myself 1) could it be true? 2) is it possible that 99.9% believe in a round sphere globe and are wrong? and 3) is the NWO order that good they could of kept the Great Lie going for some 500 years?.
So far, to all of these questions I’ve concluded are a big YES! it’s like we are being let in on one of the greatest of secrets in this new Age of Discovery.
(must read books are “Flat Earth Conspiracy” by E. Dubay, Flat Earth , the history of an infamous idea by Christine Garwood and the work in the links above.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I had seen this piece of film before and liked it. Is that the same chap? I’ll have to watch it l again with that in mind. His delivery in part 1 and 2 seemed different, sounded less serious.
The fact that he is the only link to this retarded nonsense should raise a red flag don’t you think? You are all insanely ignorant or stupid if you believe this moron. Pretty soon there will be high altitude airplanes that will be able to fly you from New York to Los Angeles in under an hour. You will be able to see the curvature of the Earth out the windows.
Companies are offering plans for future high altitude gondola rides that will take you on a ride high up past the stratosphere. You will see that the Earth is round. It orbits our sun.
The evidence is completely 110% undeniable. To pursue any other explanation means you are fucking retard. End of story.
and you’re a shill, bye
Matt is abrasive and rough around the edges, But I do think some ppl need that to shake them up n get em thinkin ya know..Ive done my homework and still Matt has been the only one to bridge the “space missions” for the underlying purpose to reach an altitude” to check out what we agreed on 500 years ago and if they were wrong would they tell ya”..Thanks Matt for your insight
The NASA channel is his own channel you lazy imbecile and he’s an actor acting.
YouTube has banned TheNASAchannel.
Says so when you click on it.
They also banned one of Matt’s backup channels.
Good lord. You conspiracy nutters are something else.