Charred remains of fire on Apollo 1 that killed three astronots….so the story goes..
Just before we sent a man to the moon, as the official story goes, there were many mysterious deaths of Apollo candidates for the Moon shot. Were they silenced because they could not be mind controlled or counted on to keep the Great Lie going?
*****
Apollo/Satan and his fall from Heaven.
Apollo is a powerful God which has inspired several “demonic” or Abyssic Gods. Known as Helios by Nero Caesar, Phoebus or “Shining,” Apollo is the twin brother of Artemis (Diana). His center of worship was at was at Delphi and was renowned throughout the ancient world for its oracular advice delivered by a priestess called the Pythia the Chthonic serpent/dragon.
Nero Caesar and Domitian actually considered himself a manifestation of Apollo as he is the God of Illumination, Light, Music, Medicine and more. His arrows send plague and death which earned him the Biblical name of Apollyon or Abaddon, the King of the Bottomless Pit/ Lucifer.
- Ted Freeman (T-38 crash, 1964)
- Elliott See and Charlie Bassett (T-38 accident, 1966)
- Virgil “Gus” Grissom (supposedly an outspoken critic of the Space Program) (Apollo 1 fire, January 1967) Ed White (Apollo 1 fire, January 1967) Roger Chaffee (Apollo 1 fire, January 1967)
- Ed Givens (car accident, 1967)
- C. C. Williams (T-38 accident, October 1967)
- X-15 pilot Mike Adams (the only X-15 pilot killed in November 1967 during the X-15 flight test program – not a NASA astronaut, but had flown X-15 above 50 miles).
- Robert Lawrence, scheduled to be an Air Force Manned Orbiting Laboratory pilot who died in a jet crash in December 1967, shortly after reporting for duty to that (later cancelled) program.
- NASA worker Thomas Baron Train crash, 1967 shortly after making accusations before Congress about the cause of the Apollo 1 fire, after which he was fired. Ruled as suicide.
- Paul Jacobs, a private investigator from San Francisco, interviewed the head of the US Department of Geology in Washington about the ‘moon rocks’. Did you examine the Moon rocks, did they really come from the Moon? Jacobs asked – the geologist did not respond, only laughed. Paul Jacobs and his wife died from cancer within 90 days.
- Lee Gelvani claims to have almost convinced James Irwin, an Apollo 15 astronaut whom Gelvani referred to as an “informant”, to confess about a cover-up having occurred. Irwin was supposedly going to contact Kaysing about it; however he died of a heart attack in 1991, before any such telephone call occurred. Spacecraft testing and flying high performance jet aircraft can be dangerous, and all but one of the astronaut deaths (Irwin’s) were directly related to their rather hazardous job. Two of the astronauts, Mike Adams and Robert Lawrence, had no connection with the civilian manned space program. Astronaut James Irwin had suffered several heart attacks in the years prior to his death. There is no independent confirmation of Gelvani’s claim that Irwin was about to come forward. Moreover, if there was a coverup (that the Apollo 11 and subsequent landings were faked), the coverup would logically have occurred in 1969 and subsequent years – yet all of the deaths listed above occurred in 1967 or earlier.
Copy and WIN : http://ow.ly/KNICZ
****
10 Dead NASA astronauts, 1964-67
***
On 27 January 1967, two years before the first moon landing, Virgil “Gus” Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee were killed in a devastating fire on the Apollo 1 launchpad during a full scale launch simulation. Grissom was greatly liked by his peers, was a strong character, and occupied a central position in the NASA space program. Many had predicted that it would be Grissom who would be the first to walk on the moon.
But Grissom was also an outspoken critic of the program. Among his last words before he died, when there was a communications failure with the capsule just prior to the fire, were: “How are we going to get to the moon when we can’t communicate between two buildings?”
Moments later, the capsule burst into flames with the astronauts sealed inside. They were consumed by the fire with no chance to escape. His widow Betty and his son Scott both still maintain that the astronauts were killed deliberately by sabotage – and that their many questions have never been adequately answered.
Clark McClelland and John Lear insist that there was also a fourth astronaut who died in the capsule, a member of an alternative space program… the “real” one, employing top secret advanced technology, which was highly classified. After the fire, according to McClelland and Lear, a heavy cover-up ensued that continues to this day. (Please see Project Camelot’s interview with John Lear for more details. Lear states that the fourth astronaut’s name is known.)
Thomas Ronald Baron was a safety inspector in Apollo 1’s construction. After the fire, Baron testified before Congress that the Apollo program was in such disarray that the United States would never make it to the moon. He claimed his opinions made him a target, and on 21 April 1967 reported on camera to news reporters that he and his wife had been harassed at home. As part of his testimony Baron submitted a 500 page report detailing his findings. Exactly one week after he testified, Baron’s car was struck by a train and he, his wife and his stepdaughter were all killed instantly. Baron’s report mysteriously disappeared, and to this day it has never been found.
The Apollo program continued, and so did the string of untimely deaths. Between the years of 1964 and 1967 a total of 10 astronauts lost their lives in freak accidents. These deaths accounted for an astonishing 15% of NASA’s astronaut corps.
*****
Apollo 1 Astronots praying over Apollo Command Module…why?
“How are we going to get to the moon if we can’t talk between two buildings?” Ed Grissom, Apollo 1
The issue of mysterious and untimely deaths also plagues the moon shots. Were whistleblowers silenced? The January 1967 death of Gus Grissom, along with Ed White and Roger Chaffee in the Apollo 1 fire, is a possibility. One of the more prominent debunkers of the “we-never-went-to-the-moon” crowd has published his “disgust” that Bill Kaysing would suggest that Gus Grissom was murdered in order to silence him.
Who else makes such a “disgusting” claim? Grissom’s wife and son do. They both believe that the Apollo 1 fire was no accident, and that the truth is being covered up. They have evidence that such a notion might be true, and Grissom’s son Scott is calling for an official investigation into the matter as of 2002. Grissom was critical of NASA, hanging a lemon on a NASA simulator before he died.
People associated with the Apollo 1 simulation on the day of the fire remarked on the strange atmosphere that prevailed. Grissom told his wife that if somebody died in an “accident,” it would likely be him, and not because he was accident prone. Straight-talking Grissom apparently made the NASA brass uneasy with his observations. During the Apollo 1 simulation, just before he died, the communications with the Command Module completely broke down, and Grissom said in exasperation, “How are we going to get to the moon if we can’t talk between two buildings?”
Lola Morrow was the astronauts’ secretary. On the show Moon Shot she can be heard describing the atmosphere on the morning of the fire. She described the mood of Grissom, White and Chaffee as one she had never seen before. Before each flight and major event, the astronauts were eager to get to it. Not that day. They obviously did not want to do the simulation.
Clark MacDonald, an engineer working for McDonnell-Douglas, was hired by NASA to investigate the fire. He now has admitted that more than thirty years earlier, NASA destroyed the evidence he gathered, as well as the report he produced, for “public relations” reasons. MacDonald determined that an electrical short started the fire when the battery power was switched on. Grissom’s son Scott was granted access to the Apollo 1 craft, where he gathered evidence that he says pointed to sabotage, and that there has been a cover-up of it. (Source)
Grissom’s death (taking White and Chaffee with him) is not the only strange one. Bill Kaysing thinks that another man was silenced by murder. Thomas Baron was an inspector for North American Rockwell, the contractor that built the Command Module. The astronauts are united in the opinion that what Rockwell produced was of initially poor quality. The astronauts comment on it in Moon Shot.
Baron was not an engineer, and only had a high school education, but was the detail-oriented fanatic that all technical organizations need. His pals gave him the initials “DR,” which stood for discrepancy report. His supervisor ran out of discrepancy report forms regularly, because Baron used so many of them. He was the squeaky wheel. He made some of his findings public, and Rockwell fired him about three weeks before the Apollo 1 fire. Baron originally produced a fifty-five-page report, and finished a 500-page report that he delivered when he testified to Congress in April of 1967.
His testimony received a hostile reception. A few days later he was dead. His car was struck by a train, killing not only himself, but also his wife and stepdaughter. In shades of Casolaro and Wilcher, his death was officially ruled a suicide. It was worse than that, because he did not only “kill” himself, but also murdered his wife and her child. It took some interesting psychology to arrive at that conclusion, going from being overly conscientious to becoming a murderer.
One theory is that he was distraught over the Apollo 1 fire, so he killed himself and his family. I have not heard about anybody else connected to the Apollo program killing themselves or becoming murderers over the Apollo 1 “accident.” How strange that the biggest whistleblower did. Just what are those odds? The 500-page report disappeared, and has not been seen since.
The moon hoax debunkers have lined up behind the official explanation. Jay Windley thinks that Barons’ report has come up missing partly because it had little investigative value, and that Baron may have indeed killed himself, but if he were murdered, it would have been a private contractor, not NASA, and if they wanted to silence him, they should have done it before he testified. Jay may be right, but I have encountered far too many conveniently timed deaths during my investigations to make my suspicion go away, especially when Grissom’s son thinks he was murdered.
Killing whistleblowers such as Thomas Baron was standard operating procedure for the defense establishment, if it related to military matters. I know people who have been involved in Department of Defense whistle-blowing activities. It could get pretty scary. Sometimes, people would simply “disappear,” Jimmy Hoffa-style.
When billions of dollars are at stake, murdering a few people with “big mouths” or who otherwise stand in the way is standard activity. That is the nature of American-style capitalism. Why should it be different regarding space matters? I was challenged to provide some evidence of what I know about whistle-blowers, and without naming names, this footnote presents a little of what I am aware of.[62]
James Irwin was an Apollo 15 astronaut. He became a Born Again Christian, leading an effort to find Noah’s Ark. According to what I have read and heard, in 1991, Irwin contacted Kaysing to have a chat. Why would Irwin call a “kook” such as Kaysing? Four days after allegedly trying to contact Kaysing, Irwin was dead from a heart attack. Did “Born Again” Irwin want to unburden his conscience? Irwin had heart disease, so that may explain it, but the spooks can apparently induce heart attacks using normally undetectable means. ”
Aplanetruth.info 
I think that 500 years ago when the Vatican (Satan) wanted to deceive people of the their reality, the ball Earth, they had to change the calendar too, in order to draw attention away from the Moon. Tonight I am watching a full moon with the sun just going down, they are both going in the same direction. The helio centric model says the moon is going opposite of the moon, its not.
LikeLike
The moon is going opposite of the Sun, is what I meant, sorry.
LikeLike
Check your spelling!!!!!!!!!!!!! It’s ASTRONAUT not Astrononts. Unbelieveable
LikeLike
Uh! No They are Astro-Actors or NOTS…no matter how many exclamation marks you try to make your correction of grammar, yet not see the forest through the b.s.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The short version: back then they suffered from ‘Moon fever’. Nasa wanted to get there and they wanted to get there fast. The block 1 type spacecraft was rushed and the design was changed too much. Furhtermore the workload of all involved was way too high. The pure oxygen atmosphere, flammable material which should have been removed and a dangerous hatch design did the rest. Unfortunately.
LikeLike
…Or they built the rocket, launched it until it got out of sight and splashed it down in ocean, showed a fake video, some cgi photo’s and get the billions in prize money for fooling 99.9% of the public, which continues to this day…yet not in the trillions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The more time elapses the more apparent it becomes that NASA did not “go to the moon” … or certainly not in the way we,the public,have been told…there are many many mnay strange deaths that have occured in and around the space program…including the peripheral researches into UFO`s and ET etc…it isn`t mere coincidence that so many scientists and reporters have dies among others either.
LikeLike
…’died’?
You conspiracists are illiterate morons.
You are so excited about getting a dumb idea published on the internet, you don’t proof your work…
and you seem to have no idea of physics, optics, mechanics etc.
So there!
LikeLike
Just out of curiosity, it took a lot of “power” to get out into earth’s orbit and then to the moon (and note: they were running out of fuel before landing the lunar module), but how did they then get back up from the moon to dock with the orbiting craft waiting for them on the moon’s orbit…?
LikeLike
So true, they spent years practicing how to get out of Earth’s orbit, but didn’t have any practice on the return trip, but miraculously get it right on the first run. I think the NASA operation is a propaganda operation only, not a space program. You never hear about the return mechanics, only the lift-off and moon landing. This deception is going to be revealed shortly. And it will be a true game changer.
LikeLike
The moon landings are the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on mankind. The way they pulled this thing off was very simple. It was so compartmentalized that nobody knew the whole story with the exception of a few folks at the very top of NASA and the astronauts who were all military men with high level security clearances. They moved mission control to Houston from Langley so the folks at NASA Langley could feed fake telemetry data to the mission controllers in Houston who actually thought the damn thing was on the way to the moon when it was really low earth orbit. Of course the folks at Kennedy Space center thought it was going to the moon because they launched it, but once it lifted off, they were out of the picture.
To do the video of the lunar lander landing on and taking off from the moon they built a gigantic gantry crane (that is still standing) in the pine woods on the back 40 of NASA Langley and constructed a five acre fake moonscape under it complete with craters. There is no way they could hide this monstrosity, on a clear day you can see if from across of the Chesapeake Bay. Everyone knew that it was built so the astronauts could simulate landing on the moon, you could drive by and see the lunar lander simulator hanging from it. The sheeple just had no idea that what they were really watching on television that night Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin was a pre-recorded simulation done at NASA Langley.
In the 1960s the KGB figured out that the moon landings were fake and that the whole Apollo program was massive psy-op but they decided to sit on that info to use it for future blackmail. Then in 1972 the Soviet Union had suffered a massive crop failure. They needed A LOT of grain or millions were going to starve. There was only one place where they could get the amount of grain they needed to avert the coming calamity that could very likely lead to the collapse of the Soviet Union and that was their Cold War arch-enemy the United States. So the Russians through diplomatic channels let the Nixon administration know that they knew the moon missions were fake but they were willing to keep mum and play along with the US moon landings if Nixon would agree the sell them the grain they needed at heavily subsidized prices.
Nixon agreed to let them buy 10 million tons of grain on the US market at heavily subsidized prices. At the time nobody could fathom why Nixon had agreed to a deal like this with the Soviets. Grain prices soared to 125 year highs at the Chicago board of Trade. Food prices in the US increased. Nixon’s Soviet grain deal eventually became known as the “Great Grain Robbery”, but it wasn’t a robbery at all, Tricky Dick had simply raided the granary to buy the Soviets to keep them from blowing the lid off of the Apollo fakery. So the Russians got their bread and America got the Moon!
As Paul Harvey used to say, and now you know the rest of the story!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why was Nixon pushing to prove the moon landing challenge given by Kennedy?
LikeLike
Apollo is Satan? Well then, by that correlation, Gandhi must be Jesus!
Also, that prayer portrait was a joke because of all the problems they’d been having during the program’s development. Maybe God incinerated those astronauts for mocking Him?!!!?
LikeLike
There is a fake video about Stanley Kubrick confessing he shot the fake films and photos Nasa uses. But there are good reason to believe he did just that while not confessing it in this manner. The russians have demonstrated using knowledge about filmmaking in particular about light sources how Kubrick went about it and how the preparations before his film 2001 were actually simultaneously the preparations for the Apollo hoax. Kubrick needed a stronger light intensity than anything available and solved it with a retroreflecting screen, which boosted the intensity hundredfold compared with a diffusively reflecting screen.
There are also russians on american pay who preach Nasas gospel.
The russians have also listed the wealth of sudden collaborative projects offered by the americans (and other western nations) at that time including both agreements about regulation of nuclear weapons and about underpriced grain from Us farmers. A pipeline payed by the west for oil export to Europe was projected. The Us even exported electronic components directly to the Sovjet military industrial complex.
This was around the time when historian Anthony Sutton blew the whistle calling it national suicide and shortly fell from grace.
In the long list I saw they didnt explicitly mention the USTEC program but they mentioned Armand Hammer for one particular project. Hammer was the middleman for the Ussr and 500 american technological companies taking part in the collaboration.
Historians avoid this alltogether.
LikeLike
[…] Thomas Ronald Baron was a safety inspector in Apollo 1’s construction. After the fire, Baron testified before Congress that the Apollo program was in such disarray that the United States would never make it to the moon. He claimed his opinions made him a target, and on 21 April 1967 reported on camera to news reporters that he and his wife had been harassed at home. As part of his testimony Baron submitted a 500 page report detailing his findings. Exactly one week after he testified, Baron’s car was struck by a train and he, his wife and his stepdaughter were all killed instantly. Baron’s report mysteriously disappeared, and to this day it has never been found. […]
LikeLike
[…] случаем, без каких–либо подозрений в преступлении….Томас Рональд Барон был инспектором по безопасности на строительстве […]
LikeLike
[…] После пожара Барон засвидетельствовал перед Конгрессом, что программа «Аполлон» находится в таком хаосе, что Соединенные Штаты никогда не доберутся до Луны. Он утверждал, что его мнение сделало его мишенью, и 21 апреля 1967 г. сообщил на камеру репортерам, что он и его жена подвергались угрозам. В рамках своих показаний Барон представил отчет на 500 страницах, в котором подробно изложил свои выводы. Ровно через неделю после того, как он дал показания, автомобиль Барона был сбит поездом, и он, его жена и его падчерица были мгновенно убиты. Отчет Барона таинственным образом исчез, и по сей день его так и не нашли. […]
LikeLike
I guess believing in something is useful just not sustainable or provable. Possible but not tangible thought gives a reason to rise up, contented, no.
If all is deception then what is life? All arguments displayed, All said and done, Faith is everything. Faith makes the next step a little easier.
LikeLike